|
Post by Bentley on Nov 6, 2024 20:54:09 GMT
You keep giving an answer to a different question . No one asked you if you give a shit about skin colour ..unless you are saying that you wouldn’t or don’t give a shit if/ that the white British population is dwindling. Just andreas usual MO when he has dug a hole for himself... Well I do think that in an attempt to virtue signal he has painted himself in a corner. He certainly is out of step with just about everyone who wants black and Asian people to have more representation.Which is ironic really .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 6, 2024 20:45:02 GMT
That didn’t answer the question but it raises another question . Would you give a shit if the white British population was dwindling ? The white British population IS dwindling. I still don't give a shit about someone's skin colour. I don't know if you're white, brown, black or yellow. Would you expect me to treat me differently if I knew? You keep giving an answer to a different question . No one asked you if you give a shit about skin colour ..unless you are saying that you wouldn’t or don’t give a shit if/ that the white British population is dwindling.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 6, 2024 20:35:32 GMT
Eye candy?Lol
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 6, 2024 20:32:52 GMT
When you say 'our' birth rate, you refer to the white British population, right? I'm talking about British born and bred. I couldn't give a shit about the colour of someone's skin. If you do, that's your issue. That didn’t answer the question but it raises another question . Would you give a shit if the white British population was dwindling ?
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 6, 2024 19:37:59 GMT
He was second generation migrant. It's just andrea being andrea mate... It’s lefties being lefties . They try to pass around the Koolaid that second generation migrants would automatically integrate into British society …something refuted by simple observation.For instance ,The ethnic minorities in the East end of London have not become crafty cockney West Ham supporters, some have but it’s obvious that many, if not most have no intention of integrating with the white locals . A small example is the influx of Charedi Jews in Canvey island Essex . They are a nightmare to those who live near them and never intergrate with the Islanders . They couldn’t even if they wanted to , their culture forbids it .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 6, 2024 17:09:24 GMT
Were they when those children were born who have been murdered by the unwanted andrea? If you are referring to Southport, the man wasn't an immigrant. I thought that you were actually making a point about the workforce being able to be made up purely of those born in this country, i.e. the macro issue. He was second generation migrant.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 6, 2024 17:08:15 GMT
I like that she said they were practicing’ student politics ‘ she has their number from day one .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 6, 2024 14:32:41 GMT
Doofus lives on planet doofus . Farmers need shotguns but can’t use them for clay pigeon shooting. No using guns for sport . What next ? Ban archery? It’s straight out of the mindset of a thick leftie troll.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 5, 2024 22:16:12 GMT
No clay pigeon shoots, no target shooting. Why ? Cos thick lefties hate it.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 5, 2024 21:00:47 GMT
Politics of envy ^
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 5, 2024 17:19:39 GMT
I can see Lukashenko saying this because that would be a favourable scenario for Belorussia. A draw would mean he can sit on the fence whereas a full victory for Moscow would pull Minsk even closer. I am sorry but we have to look at the reality. Look at the battlefield. Russian advance is increasing in speed. They have a winning hand on the battlefield they will be not be interested in negotiations to achieve half measures. Once Ukrainian front falls they will achieve their ultimate objective, taking the whole of the Ukraine. "How sure are you that Russia wants the whole of the Ukraine"? These organisations are uncertain about their war aims. ...the Kremlin has not provided a clear and consistent public narrative regarding its objectives, maintaining significant ambiguity and even adopting contradictory stances. www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2061-6.html#citation...leaving himself considerable wiggle room to declare victory depending on battlefield developments. Broadly speaking, his goals fall into three baskets: weakening or disrupting Ukraine’s ties with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), stymieing Ukrainian nationalism, and expanding territorial gains. www.cfr.org/expert-brief/what-does-putin-really-want-ukraineIMO you can’t realistically ask that question before asking this one “ How sure are you that Russia can gain the whole of Ukraine “ If the answer is yes then it pretty much answers the second .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 5, 2024 17:13:31 GMT
well seeing the war was won by the Russians it dosent matter Funny, I thought it was the Allies. Maybe you're talking about a different war. He’s thinking of the Russian revolution 😁
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 5, 2024 17:10:02 GMT
What is the statistics of people murdered or suicide by legally owned handguns . Any other statistic could be irrelevant or misleading.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 5, 2024 13:08:34 GMT
Nations are no less a construct than religious groups . They both are reflections of family groups/ tribes. I don’t see nationalism being a more noble than Islam and I don’t see Nationalism as being anything other than elitism with a border. Oh there is a major difference Nationalism is joint protection of one's own and those you agree to reside with you and the Islamic Ummah is a way to protect belief. In the former people are the important aspect in the latter it is the belief that is protected by only protecting those of the belief. Do not believe for one moment that hierarchies do not exist in Islam. Hierarchies exist in Nationalism. In Islam belief is the glue that holds the community together . In Nationalism it’s borders and ethnicity . Nationalism brooks no dissent just as Islam does. They both are essentially beliefs and both have a spectrum of intensity.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 5, 2024 12:22:21 GMT
Exactly. Nationalism is an authoritarian form of elitism and so is Islam . I disagree, Nationalism is born from family and tribe and is a way to protect ones own by joint endeavour, it is not there to exclude others it is there to ensure others do not interfere, usurp or otherwise cause damage to the system of National government. It can be generally beneficial to all it can be generally authoritarian but it does not have to be. We can see Nationalism/family/tribe at work in our society at many times most of it in some detrimental to our National and cultural heritage and beliefs. Corrupt elections in Africa or Asia bring tribes onto the streets to protest etc. Gaza dominates many of our Constituencies, many petty feuds are played out on the streets of London. There is nothing wrong with Nationalism, or even ethno-Nationalism that democracy cannot overcome to ensure it works as it is supposed for the benefit of the Nationals who live under it. Nations are no less a construct than religious groups . They both are reflections of family groups/ tribes. I don’t see nationalism being a more noble than Islam and I don’t see Nationalism as being anything other than elitism with a border.
|
|