|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 10, 2024 16:02:00 GMT
Don't be a twat, Shrieks - Seenile never debates.
None of his posts consist of anything more than ad hom to the effect that his opponent is: Rightist/Far Right (neither of which he can define)/Stupid/Immature/Lying or all of the above.
That is literally every one of his posts. And that is not debate, Shrieks.
Even if it does pass as such in lefty circles.
Your post along with your Avatar point directly to your complete adherence to the 'Dark Legend'. There is one single thing that I will always report a post for, your post has been reported and you know why. He’s run off to the mods again .😀 |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 10, 2024 16:03:15 GMT
Your post along with your Avatar point directly to your complete adherence to the 'Dark Legend'. There is one single thing that I will always report a post for, your post has been reported and you know why. Two can play that game, Seenile.
I have reported your post and shall continue to do so.
And what even is the "Dark Legend" anyway?
It’s a dream he has when he eats cheese before bedtime . |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 10, 2024 16:03:49 GMT
Two can play that game, Seenile.
I have reported your post and shall continue to do so.
And what even is the "Dark Legend" anyway?
It’s a dream he has when he eats cheese before bedtime . Ah. Thought so. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 10, 2024 16:05:20 GMT
Your post along with your Avatar point directly to your complete adherence to the 'Dark Legend'. There is one single thing that I will always report a post for, your post has been reported and you know why. He’s run off to the mods again .😀 To report me for stating facts!  |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 10, 2024 16:07:00 GMT
He’s run off to the mods again .😀 To report me for stating facts! Sounds about right . |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Oct 10, 2024 17:03:11 GMT
Don't be a twat, Shrieks - Seenile never debates.
None of his posts consist of anything more than ad hom to the effect that his opponent is: Rightist/Far Right (neither of which he can define)/Stupid/Immature/Lying or all of the above.
That is literally every one of his posts. And that is not debate, Shrieks.
Even if it does pass as such in lefty circles.
Your post along with your Avatar point directly to your complete adherence to the 'Dark Legend'. There is one single thing that I will always report a post for, your post has been reported and you know why. What the fuck is the "Dark Legend"? Is it something you made up for when people persistently disagree with you, so you can pretend you are right and they are part of something sinister? All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Oct 10, 2024 21:03:53 GMT
A typical nonsensical right wing approach - we can steal someone else's territory or land because it is in our interests to do so, the policy of Putin. We didn't steal anything - the islands were ceded to us by the French after the defeat of Napoleon. Treaty of Paris 1814. This is wrong The Treaty of 1814 ( The Paris Treaty ) ceded MAURITIUS to the United Kingdom from France, including The Chagos Islands, which were part of the colony of Mauritius. Immediately prior to granting independence to Mauritius, the UK, at the request of the United States, cut off or sliced away The Chagos Islands from Mauritius and created a new colony of the "British Indian Ocean Territory". In 1968 the Treaty of 1814 became void upon the independence of Mauritius, which should have included the Chagos Islands. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2024 21:12:36 GMT
I am not his biggest fan. But he debates far more intelligently than you do. All lefty trolls stick together. They are like scum they float on the surface. You and c2 are only here to disrupt serious debate. Why do you think you are aptly named sock puppets? Serious debate? You? lol |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 10, 2024 21:17:13 GMT
We didn't steal anything - the islands were ceded to us by the French after the defeat of Napoleon. Treaty of Paris 1814. This is wrong The Treaty of 1814 ( The Paris Treaty ) ceded MAURITIUS to the United Kingdom from France, including The Chagos Islands, which were part of the colony of Mauritius. Immediately prior to granting independence to Mauritius, the UK, at the request of the United States, cut off or sliced away The Chagos Islands from Mauritius and created a new colony of the "British Indian Ocean Territory". In 1968 the Treaty of 1814 became void upon the independence of Mauritius, which should have included the Chagos Islands. The Chagos Islands were never part of Mauritius - the French just lumped them in with Mauritius (and the Seychelles) for colonial administrative purposes and the UK continued that practice. When the French arrived on the scene the islands were uninhabited and nobody laid claim to them. Mauritius has never had control over the Islands and only a few Mauritian contractors employed by the French and British has ever set foot on them. They are actually closer to the Seychelles. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2024 21:18:49 GMT
FFS the mods must be sick of you and your constant finger on the report button....Yet you use ad homs all against others all the time and cry foul when the boots on the other foot...Man up FFS...Even the note under your avatar is a PERSONAL ATTACK on Handy....
I should be sick of your lies about me, but you are such a numptie that it is difficult to take anything you post seriously.
Check out Handyman's posts and you will see that my personal attack on him is in return for his personal attack on me, used by the same process. Its a fight fire with fire approach. On that, we agree. I would block him and the only reason I don't is that I often enjoy laughing at him. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2024 21:22:51 GMT
When they don't get their way they setup troll farms to trash other platforms. You do appear to have a weird imagination ^^ It's par for the course around here. Right wingers spouting imaginary bollocks, agreeing with each other and calling it debate, and anyone who disagrees with them is by definition a troll. lol |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 10, 2024 21:38:54 GMT
All lefty trolls stick together. They are like scum they float on the surface. You and c2 are only here to disrupt serious debate. Why do you think you are aptly named sock puppets? Serious debate? You? lol Troll....!!! |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Oct 10, 2024 21:39:55 GMT
This is wrong The Treaty of 1814 ( The Paris Treaty ) ceded MAURITIUS to the United Kingdom from France, including The Chagos Islands, which were part of the colony of Mauritius. Immediately prior to granting independence to Mauritius, the UK, at the request of the United States, cut off or sliced away The Chagos Islands from Mauritius and created a new colony of the "British Indian Ocean Territory". In 1968 the Treaty of 1814 became void upon the independence of Mauritius, which should have included the Chagos Islands. The Chagos Islands were never part of Mauritius - the French just lumped them in with Mauritius (and the Seychelles) for colonial administrative purposes and the UK continued that practice. When the French arrived on the scene the islands were uninhabited and nobody laid claim to them. Mauritius has never had control over the Islands and only a few Mauritian contractors employed by the French and British has ever set foot on them. They are actually closer to the Seychelles. Under colonial rule by the UK, the Chagos Islands were part of the colony of Mauritius ( its really that simple ) Mauritius as a colony included the Chagos Islands, and under U.N conventions, and according to the International Court, the UK acted in a dishounourable way by extracting the Chagos Islands from Mauritius for the sole purpose of handing Diego Garcia to the Americans. It would be like the UK granting independence to Australia without Tasmania, or granting independence to Canada without Vancouver Island, both of which are / and were legally part of the two colonies. The United States will retain its military base, and the islands will revert back to Mauritius, and we will further fulfil our commitment to the process of decolonization begun by Harold MacMillans "Wind of Change" speech in the 1960, which is the right thing to do. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 10, 2024 21:40:21 GMT
You do appear to have a weird imagination ^^ It's par for the course around here. Right wingers spouting imaginary bollocks, agreeing with each other and calling it debate, and anyone who disagrees with them is by definition a troll. lol Oh gawd the other troll is here again spouting his usual lefty bollocks... |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 10, 2024 21:42:05 GMT
The Chagos Islands were never part of Mauritius - the French just lumped them in with Mauritius (and the Seychelles) for colonial administrative purposes and the UK continued that practice. When the French arrived on the scene the islands were uninhabited and nobody laid claim to them. Mauritius has never had control over the Islands and only a few Mauritian contractors employed by the French and British has ever set foot on them. They are actually closer to the Seychelles. Under colonial rule by the UK, the Chagos Islands were part of the colony of Mauritius ( its really that simple ) Mauritius as a colony included the Chagos Islands, and under U.N conventions, and according to the International Court, the UK acted in a dishounourable way by extracting the Chagos Islands from Mauritius for the sole purpose of handing Diego Garcia to the Americans. It would be like the UK granting independence to Australia without Tasmania, or granting independence to Canada without Vancouver Island, both of which are / and were legally part of the two colonies. The United States will retain its military base, and the islands will revert back to Mauritius, and we will further fulfil our commitment to the process of decolonization begun by Harold MacMillans "Wind of Change" speech in the 1960, which is the right thing to do. Yet more utter bollocks from fiddles.... |
|
