|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 19, 2022 14:06:27 GMT
The EU would not approve the UK's application. I know. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 19, 2022 14:08:03 GMT
Harking back to pretend pre Brexit halcyon days won’t cut it. Meh! It probably will. It’s just white noise from a impotent minority that yearns to be an impotent majority. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 19, 2022 14:14:14 GMT
It’s just white noise from a impotent minority that yearns to be an impotent majority. You make me want to be a better person, Benny. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 19, 2022 14:16:27 GMT
It’s just white noise from a impotent minority that yearns to be an impotent majority. You make me want to be a better person, Benny. But not enough , it seems, darling. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 19, 2022 14:23:14 GMT
You make me want to be a better person, Benny. But not enough , it seems, darling. You're still the best thing that's ever happened to me, Ben. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 19, 2022 14:37:19 GMT
But not enough , it seems, darling. You're still the best thing that's ever happened to me, Ben. You need a hobby. I suggest onanism. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 19, 2022 14:41:05 GMT
You're still the best thing that's ever happened to me, Ben. I suggest onanism. You would. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 19, 2022 14:46:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 19, 2022 14:46:56 GMT
Why would the EU wish to regulate landfill operations as a way to harmonise rules and regulations and protect the environment as regards river dredging and land drainage. What has that to do with harmonise trade. Protecting teh environment is a national duty. I've no idea. I imagine there's a reason. But even if there isn't, what harm? And even if a negligible amount can be found, way to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Try to understand the advantages of having harmonised rules and regulations. It's the opposite of bureaucratic. It cuts out a lot of the bureaucracy that you and your fellow Brexiteers have gone out of your way to recreate. The harm is that in trying to harmonise rules it begets a one size fits all scenario. As an example after 92 as regards abattoirs many small abattoirs had to close up shop as they could not meet the expensive new regulations that largely they had no need to meet as they served small local areas. These closures continued well up to the present with some quoting relentless red tape as the reason for packing it in. Harmonisation of rules and regs means you have to cover all bases when harmonising and it is each National government that has the bureaucratic job of putting directives into law. What happened in the past was local inspectors made decisions on satisfactory operation to a much less detailed set of regs. Now the devil is in the detail. In early 93 it cost me £30 for a 6m3 skip, you could now pay anything over £300 so harmonisation of rules increased costs all round. It seems harmonisation means the EU can help themselves to what is ours like our fish. That whole sorry episode from 72 to now is a tale of EU snatch and grab and that should have been our first lesson. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 19, 2022 14:49:44 GMT
I've no idea. I imagine there's a reason. But even if there isn't, what harm? And even if a negligible amount can be found, way to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Try to understand the advantages of having harmonised rules and regulations. It's the opposite of bureaucratic. It cuts out a lot of the bureaucracy that you and your fellow Brexiteers have gone out of your way to recreate. The harm is that in trying to harmonise rules it begets a one size fits all scenario. As an example after 92 as regards abattoirs many small abattoirs had to close up shop as they could not meet the expensive new regulations that largely they had no need to meet as they served small local areas. These closures continued well up to the present with some quoting relentless red tape as the reason for packing it in. Harmonisation of rules and regs means you have to cover all bases when harmonising and it is each National government that has the bureaucratic job of putting directives into law. What happened in the past was local inspectors made decisions on satisfactory operation to a much less detailed set of regs. Now the devil is in the detail. In early 93 it cost me £30 for a 6m3 skip, you could now pay anything over £300 so harmonisation of rules increased costs all round. It seems harmonisation means the EU can help themselves to what is ours like our fish. That whole sorry episode from 72 to now is a tale of EU snatch and grab and that should have been our first lesson. There's always a price to pay. There's no perfect way. The only sensible measure is: does the good outweigh the bad? |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 19, 2022 14:53:07 GMT
You may be a prolific onanist, Benny, but I'm damned if I'll let it define you. Those who look past your incessant masturbation will see a friend to all. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 19, 2022 14:56:19 GMT
You may be a prolific onanist, Benny, but I'm damned if I'll let it define you. Those who look past your incessant masturbation will see a friend to all. Your profile not mine, darling. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 19, 2022 14:57:47 GMT
You may be a prolific onanist, Benny, but I'm damned if I'll let it define you. Those who look past your incessant masturbation will see a friend to all. Your profile not mine, darling. You shouldn't try to be me, Benny. Set your sights higher. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 19, 2022 15:42:58 GMT
The harm is that in trying to harmonise rules it begets a one size fits all scenario. As an example after 92 as regards abattoirs many small abattoirs had to close up shop as they could not meet the expensive new regulations that largely they had no need to meet as they served small local areas. These closures continued well up to the present with some quoting relentless red tape as the reason for packing it in. Harmonisation of rules and regs means you have to cover all bases when harmonising and it is each National government that has the bureaucratic job of putting directives into law. What happened in the past was local inspectors made decisions on satisfactory operation to a much less detailed set of regs. Now the devil is in the detail. In early 93 it cost me £30 for a 6m3 skip, you could now pay anything over £300 so harmonisation of rules increased costs all round. It seems harmonisation means the EU can help themselves to what is ours like our fish. That whole sorry episode from 72 to now is a tale of EU snatch and grab and that should have been our first lesson. There's always a price to pay. There's no perfect way. The only sensible measure is: does the good outweigh the bad? Did you just not tell me off a few short posts ago for suggesting that that is the principle people voted on when they made a judgement on that balance. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 19, 2022 15:54:01 GMT
There's always a price to pay. There's no perfect way. The only sensible measure is: does the good outweigh the bad? Did you just not tell me off a few short posts ago for suggesting that that is the principle people voted on when they made a judgement on that balance. What? |
|
