|
Post by Bentley on Aug 14, 2024 15:38:05 GMT
The fact that these migrants pay criminal traffickers makes them part of a criminal conspiracy . It’s so fucking obvious to anyone but the virtue signallers and cynical lefties with an agenda.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Aug 15, 2024 6:31:33 GMT
For social housing. Rayner has said that immigrants, illegal or not have equal claim. They have not paid a penny into the system, and if they are old, cannot speak, or refuse to, will not pay anything. Meanwhile, those that have worked for a pittance, struggled to bring up families, etc, get overlooked. This is Red Britain today. Surely Labour have signed their resignation from goverrnment over and over. There is a huge vacuum, a big chance for Reform to fill the void. Labour are a pox. What about immigrants who work for a pittance and struggle to brin up a family versus an English person who hasn't paid a penny into the system? What about them They want to immigrate: fine, let's see the size of their wallets. They should be 'no recourse to public funds' until naturalised, which should also come at a heavy price.
|
|
|
Post by aristaeus on Aug 15, 2024 10:30:48 GMT
What about immigrants who work for a pittance and struggle to brin up a family versus an English person who hasn't paid a penny into the system? What about them They want to immigrate: fine, let's see the size of their wallets. They should be 'no recourse to public funds' until naturalised, which should also come at a heavy price. Immigrants who work and pay taxes should have no recourse to public funds???
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 15, 2024 10:59:38 GMT
What about them They want to immigrate: fine, let's see the size of their wallets. They should be 'no recourse to public funds' until naturalised, which should also come at a heavy price. Immigrants who work and pay taxes should have no recourse to public funds??? They already do. The infrastructure that they enjoy from the first day of arrival is funded by public funds .
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Aug 15, 2024 13:53:29 GMT
What about them They want to immigrate: fine, let's see the size of their wallets. They should be 'no recourse to public funds' until naturalised, which should also come at a heavy price. Immigrants who work and pay taxes should have no recourse to public funds??? If I leave the UK and then return, I am not allowed free NHS treatment until I have paid two full years NI I say again No immigrant to the UK should be able to claim a penny from the state until they are a citizen of it
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Aug 15, 2024 14:33:13 GMT
Immigrants who work and pay taxes should have no recourse to public funds??? If I leave the UK and then return, I am not allowed free NHS treatment until I have paid two full years NI
I say again No immigrant to the UK should be able to claim a penny from the state until they are a citizen of it Well that might be the theory but it certainly is not the practice - the NHS does not know where you have come from and it does not ask.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2024 14:38:43 GMT
If I leave the UK and then return, I am not allowed free NHS treatment until I have paid two full years NI
I say again No immigrant to the UK should be able to claim a penny from the state until they are a citizen of it Well that might be the theory but it certainly is not the practice - the NHS does not know where you have come from and it does not ask. They do occasionally claim back fees: www.guysandstthomas.nhs.uk/visiting-us/overseas-patientsI suspect it is a two tier system where low hanging fruit is picked, like Americans, for example.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Aug 15, 2024 14:40:42 GMT
Well that might be the theory but it certainly is not the practice - the NHS does not know where you have come from and it does not ask. They do occasionally claim back fees: www.guysandstthomas.nhs.uk/visiting-us/overseas-patientsI suspect it is a two tier system where low hanging fruit is picked, like Americans, for example. I meant the idea that UK citizens returning to the UK are not allowed access for 2 years - certainly not my experience.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2024 14:53:31 GMT
I meant the idea that UK citizens returning to the UK are not allowed access for 2 years - certainly not my experience. Nor mine, but I was paying N.I. whilst living abroad for nearly 2 decades.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Aug 15, 2024 14:57:10 GMT
If I leave the UK and then return, I am not allowed free NHS treatment until I have paid two full years NI
I say again No immigrant to the UK should be able to claim a penny from the state until they are a citizen of it Well that might be the theory but it certainly is not the practice - the NHS does not know where you have come from and it does not ask. Wrong. Well, wrong in part
It was, i grant you, a rere sight indeed to see the man with the card machine and payment plans walking the corridors of Slough General where Heathrow's patients get taken, but he did and does
And every reception desk in south wales does crossreference my NHS patient number to ny NI record.
It soes not do so for pikeys and immigrants of course. They get in free
|
|