|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 17, 2024 17:24:35 GMT
So you're claiming that: 1) Scotland haven't just introduced such a law. 2) Starmer hasn't stated that Labour would do similar. Nope, never claimed that at all. B-4 did however claim that you can be arrested for refusing to call a man a woman, despite there not being a single case of it happening in the UK. All The Best That’s probably the natural order of things. First it CAN happen and then it does happen . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 17, 2024 17:30:25 GMT
Tbh this has all been discussed in another thread .
|
|
|
|
Post by seniorcitizen007 on Mar 17, 2024 21:51:33 GMT
Sir Keir Rodney Starmer anagrams to YEMEN TERROR RAIDS RISK
... maybe I should warn him?
Anagrams are fun:
Charles Philip Arthur George Mountbatten-Windsor ... King Charles III's full name
... anagrams to:
CHRIST PHAROAH WORLD RULER NUTTEE MAN GOT BIG PENIS
Barack Hussein Obama
ABU KHAN BOSS AMERICA
Abu, "Father"
Khan, "Ruler"
Ronald Wilson Reagan
INSANE ANGLO WAR LORD
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 17, 2024 22:08:45 GMT
Nope, never claimed that at all. B-4 did however claim that you can be arrested for refusing to call a man a woman, despite there not being a single case of it happening in the UK. All The Best That’s probably the natural order of things. First it CAN happen and then it does happen . Quite - they bring in rules that can prevent free speech and which we are told would never actually be implemented and happen, and then... If you have no intention of arresting someone for refusing to call a man a woman why have a Law that allows you to do that very thing?. |
|
