|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 17, 2024 11:33:56 GMT
Cant you even read copied &paste lol Or what you written Why would I want to read copied and paste when it has absolutely nothing to do with what I asked you? |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Mar 17, 2024 11:37:00 GMT
Cant you even read copied &paste lol Or what you written Why would I want to read copied and paste when it has absolutely nothing to do with what I asked you? How do you know it has nothing to do with what you Asked if you haven't read it lol. Keep digging. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 17, 2024 11:38:16 GMT
Lets try to decipher this post, bit-by-bit ^^
By dead person do you mean ... Thatcher?
A spiteful tory ...do you mean Starmer?
What did he praise her for?
Why is Brexit destroying something that he praised her for?
Subscribe MarketsQuicktake Why London’s Once-Vibrant Stock Market Is in a Rut The London Stock Exchange Group Plc office atrium in the City of London. The London Stock Exchange Group Plc office atrium in the City of London.Photographer: Hollie Adams/Bloomberg By Swetha Gopinath, Michael Msika, and Joe Easton 28 February 2024 at 12:27 GMT Save Since Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher unleashed a wave of privatizations in the 1980s, the London Stock Exchange has been a symbol of Britain’s free-market economy. Home to companies that dominate global industries, including AstraZeneca Plc, Shell Plc and HSBC Holdings Plc, the FTSE 100 Index is an international benchmark. However, trading volume has slumped in recent years and some British companies have picked other markets to list their shares. That appears to fit the narrative of a nation whose economy is being held back by weak productivity, under-investment and the jolt to trade from Brexit. Yet there are other, more complex factors at play. Companies raised just $1 billion on the London Stock Exchange in 2023, the least since 2009. The underperformance was remarkable even in the context of a global drought in initial public offerings. An especially bitter blow was London’s failure to secure the listing of one of the UK’s most important technology companies — Cambridge, England-based chip designer Arm Holdings Plc. Despite fevered lobbying by government ministers, and an offer to relax UK listing rules, Arm’s Japanese parent company SoftBank Group Corp. chose New York for its return to public markets. This is what he actually said ..
“Margaret Thatcher sought to drag Britain out of its stupor by setting loose our natural entrepreneurialism,” he said of the Conservative PM, whose deregulation of the City of London, battle with trade unions, and sale of social housing stock continue to rile parts of Starmer’s own party.
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Mar 17, 2024 11:48:07 GMT
Margaret Thatcher sought to drag Britain out of its stupor by setting loose our natural entrepreneurialism
And what do you Mean by when you said lol .
He praised her
and don't you think the London Stock exchange is the hub of British Enterreneurusm ,
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 17, 2024 11:51:37 GMT
Do you have trouble comprehending what other people are saying? Scotland have only just passed their so-called controversial bill, and Labour will be following suit, because that's how they operate. I'm telling you what the future holds if this country proceeds on this current trend. Misgendering is a hate-crime in Scotland and a criminal offence, which can land you in prison.
I can only tell you what they have planned for you based on this and Starmer's intentions. If you want to play the role of information bot then at least understand the question. Thanks.
So you are admitting the following: No one has ever been imprisoned in the UK because of refusing to call a man a woman. No such laws even exist in England. Not sure it is me who is misunderstanding what you are saying. All The Best So you're claiming that: 1) Scotland haven't just introduced such a law. 2) Starmer hasn't stated that Labour would do similar. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 17, 2024 12:56:40 GMT
So you are admitting the following: No one has ever been imprisoned in the UK because of refusing to call a man a woman. No such laws even exist in England. Not sure it is me who is misunderstanding what you are saying. All The Best So you're claiming that: 1) Scotland haven't just introduced such a law. 2) Starmer hasn't stated that Labour would do similar. Nope, never claimed that at all. B-4 did however claim that you can be arrested for refusing to call a man a woman, despite there not being a single case of it happening in the UK. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 17, 2024 13:20:14 GMT
So you're claiming that: 1) Scotland haven't just introduced such a law. 2) Starmer hasn't stated that Labour would do similar. Nope, never claimed that at all. B-4 did however claim that you can be arrested for refusing to call a man a woman, despite there not being a single case of it happening in the UK. All The Best OK, so you accept that you can now be arrested for misgendering in Scotland and that Starmer will be adopting similar for England? Which was exactly B4s point. B-4 did however claim that you can be arrested for refusing to call a man a woman... And he was correct. ...despite there not being a single case of it happening in the UK. . You see, that's how the law works: Things are legal until they're made illegal. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2024 13:23:46 GMT
Do you have trouble comprehending what other people are saying? Scotland have only just passed their so-called controversial bill, and Labour will be following suit, because that's how they operate. I'm telling you what the future holds if this country proceeds on this current trend. Misgendering is a hate-crime in Scotland and a criminal offence, which can land you in prison.
I can only tell you what they have planned for you based on this and Starmer's intentions. If you want to play the role of information bot then at least understand the question. Thanks.
So you are admitting the following: No one has ever been imprisoned in the UK because of refusing to call a man a woman. No such laws even exist in England. Not sure it is me who is misunderstanding what you are saying. All The Best I never made any of the claims your strawman arguments have stated. I told you that Scotland has recently passed a bill that will become active next month. This hate-crime law covers misgendering, which can lead to a criminal prosecution and prison (7 years) if you don't refer to a man as a women if they are trans. As for the second part, this will obviously come through if Starmer's New Labour comes to power, or it may just be pushed through by the Tories.
I hope this isn't too difficult for you to understand, and if you're still struggling then maybe ask somebody else to explain it to you.
|
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 17, 2024 13:36:45 GMT
Nope, never claimed that at all. B-4 did however claim that you can be arrested for refusing to call a man a woman, despite there not being a single case of it happening in the UK. All The Best OK, so you accept that you can now be arrested for misgendering in Scotland and that Starmer will be adopting similar for England? No, I don't. I have so far seen no evidence of either claim. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 17, 2024 13:38:00 GMT
So you are admitting the following: No one has ever been imprisoned in the UK because of refusing to call a man a woman. No such laws even exist in England. Not sure it is me who is misunderstanding what you are saying. All The Best I never made any of the claims your strawman arguments have stated. I told you that Scotland has recently passed a bill that will become active next month. This hate-crime law covers misgendering, which can lead to a criminal prosecution and prison (7 years) if you don't refer to a man as a women if they are trans. As for the second part, this will obviously come through if Starmer's New Labour comes to power, or it may just be pushed through by the Tories.
I hope this isn't too difficult for you to understand, and if you're still struggling then maybe ask somebody else to explain it to you.
So obvious in fact that you have provided not one single shred of evidence for it. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 17, 2024 13:39:11 GMT
OK, so you accept that you can now be arrested for misgendering in Scotland and that Starmer will be adopting similar for England? No, I don't. I have so far seen no evidence of either claim. All The Best Okay.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2024 13:50:20 GMT
No, I don't. I have so far seen no evidence of either claim. All The Best Okay. Is it Steve's new troll account? |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 17, 2024 13:57:21 GMT
No, I don't. I have so far seen no evidence of either claim. All The Best Okay. You, or B-4, are free to provide links to support your claims. It is NOT my duty to do that for you. As a default I assume any claim that has not been substantiated is at least questionable, and very likely false; because far too many users of forums like this have no interest in truth, and only care about their own personal brand of propaganda. All The Best |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2024 14:03:29 GMT
Okay. You, or B-4, are free to provide links to support your claims. It is NOT my duty to do that for you. As a default I assume any claim that has not been substantiated is at least questionable, and very likely false; because far too many users of forums like this have no interest in truth, and only care about their own personal brand of propaganda. All The Best It's all in the news, which is why I presumed other people are aware of it. This is a political forum. If you want to tell lies and troll the forum then you should really join the queue, or stick to promoting Hamas propaganda on Mind Zone.
EDIT: I won't be bothering with the latest time wasting troll.
|
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 17, 2024 14:27:48 GMT
You, or B-4, are free to provide links to support your claims. It is NOT my duty to do that for you. As a default I assume any claim that has not been substantiated is at least questionable, and very likely false; because far too many users of forums like this have no interest in truth, and only care about their own personal brand of propaganda. All The Best It's all in the news, which is why I presumed other people are aware of it. This is a political forum. If you want to tell lies and troll the forum then you should really join the queue, or stick to promoting Hamas propaganda on Mind Zone. So if it is "all in the news" you'll be able to provide a link or two to relevant news outlets? Right? PS: I won't be holding my breath... All The Best |
|
