|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 24, 2024 22:41:01 GMT
Are you suggesting there has not been an increase in Islamophobic hatred since the deal between Starmer and Hoyle? What "Islamophobic hatred increase" are you referring to? Explain " the deal between Starmer and Hoyle" If you are saying that there has been no rise in Islamophobia then I stand corrected. The deal would be where the Labour Party were allowed to hijack the SNP's opposition debate. I'm sure you would be equally outraged if the SNP were allowed to hijack Labours opposition day votes? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 24, 2024 23:17:30 GMT
Exactly what part of the article do you believe is untrue? Your highlighted Claim Remarks by House of Commons speaker and Labour leader Keir Starmer have led to an explosion of Islamophobic hatred against Muslims protesting against Israel's war on Gaza"No where in that highlighted quote did it say what you Claimed it. I Google it and it lead me to that article. Dose it claims what you said . I copy and paste part of that Article it denied what you Claimed. I will copy and paste more of the Article if you want me to . I hope this helps you understand lefty old bean.....But of course as per usual it won't....
Bodyguards given to three female MPs as concerns over politicians’ safety escalate....
Three female MPs have been given taxpayer-funded bodyguards and cars as concerns over politicians’ safety are escalating.
The women – who have not been named but include representatives of the Conservative and Labour parties – have had their security upgraded as MPs are said to be “petrified” at the abuse they are facing.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 25, 2024 3:35:03 GMT
Your highlighted Claim Remarks by House of Commons speaker and Labour leader Keir Starmer have led to an explosion of Islamophobic hatred against Muslims protesting against Israel's war on Gaza"No where in that highlighted quote did it say what you Claimed it. I Google it and it lead me to that article. Dose it claims what you said . I copy and paste part of that Article it denied what you Claimed. I will copy and paste more of the Article if you want me to . I hope this helps you understand lefty old bean.....But of course as per usual it won't....
Bodyguards given to three female MPs as concerns over politicians’ safety escalate....
Three female MPs have been given taxpayer-funded bodyguards and cars as concerns over politicians’ safety are escalating.
The women – who have not been named but include representatives of the Conservative and Labour parties – have had their security upgraded as MPs are said to be “petrified” at the abuse they are facing.....
Yex it has helped me understand that the Threat Mr Starmer said was real Speaker Hoyle decision was right. It obviously goes beyond labour Mp Seeing that Conservative female Mps are also at risk. So in the face of Such risk why did the cry babies SNP kick up such a fuss. What lead to the Votes not taking place I do accept the threats to to the female Mp might not of come to light until.after The disgraceful seems at HOC What I also understand there no mention of who the Suspect are so why are right wing media and voters like yourself pushing it's down to Muslims Also ask the Question if the Speaker puts forward amother motion for the debate to take place and the SNP refuse It with there being a threat to national Security it shows they don't give a dam. And the undemocratic scum bags shouldn't Be allowed to take seats in a democratic Westminster. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 25, 2024 8:45:26 GMT
Labour and Hoyle certainly stitched up the SNP..
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 25, 2024 8:50:59 GMT
I appreciate you are dyslexic. Also how difficult it is to write and post , but surely you can try better than this? I honestly dont understand your reply. I can't see where in Pacificos article what is wrong , or what your issue is with it? Im no grammar n a z I or pedant , but I have to be able to understand your point to reply. What a cad to criticise a dyslexic member of the forum. you didnt criticise , you took the piss , while giving us your daily christian homilies on forum etiquette and decency. Must be hard watching others succeed at running a thriving forum where you failed. |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 25, 2024 8:56:34 GMT
Do you understand the post that thomas was having trouble with? You do realise Thomas has tried to guilt trip me over this poster? I didnt try and guilt trip you. I pointed out your hypocrisy as I have for the last 14 fucking years across a number of forums and the self righteous guff you come out with about forum etiquette and decency ....when it suits you of course. Sad bastard who lets his grammar pedantry lead him to take the piss out of a dyslexic guy. How very christian of you Barry. Here we are again , another thread , and Barry is letting his butthurt from another forum follow him onto this. |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 25, 2024 9:00:19 GMT
So you also Fauld to read the article
And has your usel form because disproves
Your bujll
And do know what a? In a head line means .Yes, here's a translation for Thomas and you. So you also failed to read the article And as your usual form, because disproves your bull And do you know what "A" in a headline means? You do realise Thomas has tried to guilt trip me over this poster? Sorry you have totally lost me as that makes absolutely no sense at all. I think Barry has been on the communal wine . Here's the translation for you pacifico.  |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Feb 25, 2024 9:10:04 GMT
Sorry you have totally lost me as that makes absolutely no sense at all. I think Barry has been on the communal wine . Here's the translation for you pacifico. Calm down thomas, enjoy the populists revenge. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 25, 2024 9:14:13 GMT
What "Islamophobic hatred increase" are you referring to? Explain " the deal between Starmer and Hoyle" If you are saying that there has been no rise in Islamophobia then I stand corrected. The deal would be where the Labour Party were allowed to hijack the SNP's opposition debate. I'm sure you would be equally outraged if the SNP were allowed to hijack Labours opposition day votes? You implied that there had been an increase in Islamophobic hatred. I just asked you to show evidence. So you are not now saying that you know of a deal that had been reached, a DEAL is just your assumption. The more likely is that consideration was given to the possibility of Islamic extremists attacking Labour politicians if Labour was not allowed a fair part in the debate. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 25, 2024 9:17:58 GMT
Sorry you have totally lost me as that makes absolutely no sense at all. I think Barry has been on the communal wine . Here's the translation for you pacifico. More nonsense instead of debate. |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 25, 2024 9:18:17 GMT
I think Barry has been on the communal wine . Here's the translation for you pacifico. Calm down thomas, enjoy the populists revenge. im perfectly calm sheepy. Ive obviously needled boring Barry so much he is following me around the forum with his big petted lip. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Feb 25, 2024 9:19:21 GMT
If you are saying that there has been no rise in Islamophobia then I stand corrected. The deal would be where the Labour Party were allowed to hijack the SNP's opposition debate. I'm sure you would be equally outraged if the SNP were allowed to hijack Labours opposition day votes? You implied that there had been an increase in Islamophobic hatred. I just asked you to show evidence. So you are not now saying that you know of a deal that had been reached, a DEAL is just your assumption. The more likely is that consideration was given to the possibility of Islamic extremists attacking Labour politicians if Labour was not allowed a fair part in the debate. If politicians and their followers of fashion are determined to act like arseholes, then they only have themselves to blame. |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 25, 2024 9:21:25 GMT
If you are saying that there has been no rise in Islamophobia then I stand corrected. The deal would be where the Labour Party were allowed to hijack the SNP's opposition debate. I'm sure you would be equally outraged if the SNP were allowed to hijack Labours opposition day votes? You implied that there had been an increase in Islamophobic hatred. I just asked you to show evidence. So you are not now saying that you know of a deal that had been reached, a DEAL is just your assumption. The more likely is that consideration was given to the possibility of Islamic extremists attacking Labour politicians if Labour was not allowed a fair part in the debate. Oborne article says that there has been an increase in inflammatory islamic rhetoric in the media since starmer flung the muslims under a bus as an excuse to blackmail Hoyle. It's only been a few days. Give it time , and let's see what happens. Hopefully nothing , despite the labour parties initial inflammatory statement . where is the proof this was more likely? |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 25, 2024 9:40:56 GMT
REVEALED ... how Starmer and his chief whip ambushed Lindsay Hoyle and how another Labour MP, Chris Bryant, created enough time for the duo to blackmail Hoyle into allowing Labour's amendment.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2024 10:25:35 GMT
What a cad to criticise a dyslexic member of the forum. you didnt criticise , you took the piss , while giving us your daily christian homilies on forum etiquette and decency. Must be hard watching others succeed at running a thriving forum where you failed. Ha ha ha. |
|
