|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 18:56:03 GMT
You do know that diversity and apartheid are different, don’t you? They are both made up political words.
apartheid 1947 diversity 1992
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious is a made up word and it’s not political. Baggy no returns . Nevertheless diversity is not apartheid and apartheid is not diversity .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 18:49:24 GMT
Anyone who thinks that building site workers aren’t slagged off should ask the painters 😁
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 18:48:15 GMT
I wonder how many people in the private sector would think it acceptable to describe their jobs in the way public workers are supposed accept. People in the private sector are not as thin skinned zany...Whatabout calling carpenters chippys, electricians sparks or plumbers honey dippers? Anyine who worked on a building site or a factory should know that .👍
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 18:42:47 GMT
Well it certainly makes politics a bit more interesting. Dawn Butler could get away with race baiting a white male leader but her snide remarks insinuating that Bedenoch is a ‘ coconut …. ” A Labour MP shared a social media post accusing Kemi Badenoch of representing “white supremacy in blackface” just before the new Tory party leader was elected. Dawn Butler appeared to endorse comments which also referred to Mrs Badenoch’s election as a “victory for racism”.”
….merely shows her up to be a spiteful mindless leftie Ian Douglas Smith in Rhodesia and Frederik Willem de Klerk were truly celebrated for their diversity over in her continent if you recall. Also fancy being a farmer in Zimbabwe. It's exciting. You do know that diversity and apartheid are different, don’t you?
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 18:24:18 GMT
As I understand it you might be a bit delayed this year then need to fill in a form and pay 7 euros next year . If that’s enough to make the ex remainers cry then I am not a bit surprised.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 18:18:36 GMT
Because they elected a black woman as their leader? Yep. You've got to remember that Baron is one of the posters on here who doesn't like blacks and doesn't like women. Kemi Badenough for him must be the antichrist. It doesn't take much to see through his posts though. Well it certainly makes politics a bit more interesting. Dawn Butler could get away with race baiting a white male leader but her snide remarks insinuating that Bedenoch is a ‘ coconut …. ” A Labour MP shared a social media post accusing Kemi Badenoch of representing “white supremacy in blackface” just before the new Tory party leader was elected. Dawn Butler appeared to endorse comments which also referred to Mrs Badenoch’s election as a “victory for racism”.”
….merely shows her up to be a spiteful mindless leftie
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 17:56:35 GMT
Because they elected a black woman as their leader?
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 17:53:31 GMT
Firearm homicides rare in England and Wales
In 2022/23, there were 244 knife homicides in England and Wales, compared with 282 in 2021/22, which was the highest figure in recent years. By comparison, homicides which involved the use of a firearm were far less common, with just 29 in the 2022/23 reporting year. With strict gun laws and low levels of ownership, the UK contrasts starkly with the United States, which has struggled with high levels of gun violence. Although some specialist police officers in England and Wales are licensed to carry firearms, the majority of police officers are unarmed. In 2022/23, for example, there were just 6,038 armed police, out of around 150,697 police officers.
Google
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 17:41:11 GMT
I'm back to the beginning of the thread again. I can't bloody believe the Tories! There is absolutely no hope for them now. They are the dodo party.
Why?
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 17:34:14 GMT
Here we see the left reaction to Kemi Badenoch election from Dawn French. A white person would get 5 years for posting that on X twitter. And to think we have a leftie clown ( or two) on here that bangs in about black propaganda from the right .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 15:13:47 GMT
Flick knives were a common weapon associated with Teddy Boys, a British youth subculture of the 1950s and 1960s:
What were flick knives? Flick knives had a blade in the handle that automatically came out when a button was pressed.
Why were they associated with Teddy Boys?
Teddy Boys were known for their aggressive style and many carried flick knives as a fashion accessory.
Other weapons used by Teddy Boys
Teddy Boys also used bicycle chains, cut-throat razors, and knuckle dusters.
Media portrayal
The media of the time thought that Teddy Boys and their flick knives would bring an end to civilized society.
Flick knives outlawed Flick knives were outlawed in 1957.
It seems old'uns could be looking back through rose tinted specs — when youths weren't considered mature until aged 21. Although I can't personally vouch for the veracity of any of this because it's way before my time, there do seem to be pockets of pride in some past, now feted, young gangs (eg, Peaky Blinders)... Please provide evidence of 4 Teddy boys aged between 14 and 17 who stabbed a 13 year old child with flick knives . If you can’t then please accept that your post was nothing more than a straw man .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 14:53:24 GMT
To me she is a product of diversity who knows how diversity can become a scam.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 14:48:58 GMT
As I said , it wasn’t about what you want , I used you as an example . It wasn’t a platform for you to bore us about how ‘ caring ‘ you are. I understand that you have a need to virtue signal but I don’t want you highjacking my posts to do it . Sorry I don't do this crap. I want to talk politics Then don’t use my posts as platform to virtue signal in the first place then .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 14:40:51 GMT
You replied to my post with a non point that has nothing to do with the content of the post that you replied to. You followed it up with self indulgent ,virtue signalling waffle , as usual. Nope. You pointed out how I was harmed but the poorest weren't. I simply pointed out that I don't want the poorest harmed and my reasons why. As I said , it wasn’t about what you want , I used you as an example . It wasn’t a platform for you to bore us about how ‘ caring ‘ you are. I understand that you have a need to virtue signal but I don’t want you highjacking my posts to do it .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 2, 2024 14:24:59 GMT
My post wasn’t about what what you want . The rest of your post was self indulgent waffle. My post was about what I want. The rest of your post is self indulgent insult You replied to my post with a non point that has nothing to do with the content of the post that you replied to. You followed it up with self indulgent ,virtue signalling waffle , as usual.
|
|