|
Post by Pacifico on Dec 15, 2022 18:17:57 GMT
LOL - nobody got any money out of expanding the population. Mass immigration led to a higher GDP just because you expanded the economy - what it didn't do was lead to higher growth so that GDP per capita remained the same - hence adding 10 million people to the population benefitted nobody. So you keep saying despite having it explained to you numerous times. Well feel free to explain how having no growth in per-capita GDP benefits the average working man. This should be worth listening to..
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Dec 15, 2022 18:24:03 GMT
LOL - nobody got any money out of expanding the population. Mass immigration led to a higher GDP just because you expanded the economy - what it didn't do was lead to higher growth so that GDP per capita remained the same - hence adding 10 million people to the population benefitted nobody. So you keep saying despite having it explained to you numerous times. But then when facts are explained to you, you are immediately in denial, so I see a sense of irony from your post.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Dec 15, 2022 18:25:02 GMT
So you keep saying despite having it explained to you numerous times. Well feel free to explain how having no growth in per-capita GDP benefits the average working man. This should be worth listening to.. No it wouldn't it would be the usual political clap trap.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Dec 15, 2022 18:26:02 GMT
So you keep saying despite having it explained to you numerous times. Well feel free to explain how having no growth in per-capita GDP benefits the average working man. This should be worth listening to.. Already did, you picked half what I said and made stupid flippant remarks as usual. I have no desire to play games with you, though I understand that's what you're here for.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Dec 15, 2022 18:28:06 GMT
So you keep saying despite having it explained to you numerous times. But then when facts are explained to you, you are immediately in denial, so I see a sense of irony from your post. Nonsense. I'm up for debate, just not one liners.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Dec 15, 2022 18:30:49 GMT
But then when facts are explained to you, you are immediately in denial, so I see a sense of irony from your post. Nonsense. I'm up for debate, just not one liners. That isn't even what you said to another member a minute ago. More irony.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Dec 15, 2022 18:32:03 GMT
Well feel free to explain how having no growth in per-capita GDP benefits the average working man. This should be worth listening to.. Already did, you picked half what I said and made stupid flippant remarks as usual. I have no desire to play games with you, though I understand that's what you're here for. You didnt explain anything - you made a flat statement claiming that we were getting money from expanding the population which is blatantly untrue.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Dec 15, 2022 18:41:12 GMT
Already did, you picked half what I said and made stupid flippant remarks as usual. I have no desire to play games with you, though I understand that's what you're here for. You didnt explain anything - you made a flat statement claiming that we were getting money from expanding the population which is blatantly untrue. Because they don't have a clue, it is a complicated scenario, the higher the population the more money you need to print or borrow, hence create more debt, which if you have a industrial economy can be offset against exports, as we don't they just create debt. A service economy needs less people not more as a rule and you create non producers by the bucket load. While your imports constantly outstrip your exports creating more debt. Debt with interest.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Dec 15, 2022 18:44:18 GMT
Nonsense. I'm up for debate, just not one liners. That isn't even what you said to another member a minute ago. More irony. Blah blah. I will only respond on subject from now.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Dec 15, 2022 18:49:02 GMT
You didnt explain anything - you made a flat statement claiming that we were getting money from expanding the population which is blatantly untrue. Because they don't have a clue, it is a complicated scenario, the higher the population the more money you need to print or borrow, hence create more debt, which if you have a industrial economy can be offset against exports, as we don't they just create debt. A service economy needs less people not more as a rule and you create non producers by the bucket load. While your imports constantly outstrip your exports creating more debt. Debt with interest. Clearly you missed it (I'll give you the benefit of the doubt) When you invite young fit adults to work in your country you increase GDP without much increase in tax cost for some years. You haven't had to pay for their education, health care or pension. As they remain they eventually start to cost tax money, so it becomes necessary to import a new lot and so on. I explained this to Pacifico, now I've told you.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Dec 15, 2022 18:52:02 GMT
Because they don't have a clue, it is a complicated scenario, the higher the population the more money you need to print or borrow, hence create more debt, which if you have a industrial economy can be offset against exports, as we don't they just create debt. A service economy needs less people not more as a rule and you create non producers by the bucket load. While your imports constantly outstrip your exports creating more debt. Debt with interest. Clearly you missed it (I'll give you the benefit of the doubt) When you invite young fit adults to work in your country yo increase GDP without much increase in tax cost for some years. You haven't had to pay for their education, health care or pension. As they remain they eventually start to cost tax money, so it becomes necessary to import a new lot and so on. I explained this to Pacifico, now I've told you. Pure bullshit, I have just explained it in the most simple of terms, I could show the Chinese infrastructure but it would be pointless and how fast they have built it. Because they really do understand the economics of global politics.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Dec 15, 2022 18:54:17 GMT
Clearly you missed it (I'll give you the benefit of the doubt) When you invite young fit adults to work in your country yo increase GDP without much increase in tax cost for some years. You haven't had to pay for their education, health care or pension. As they remain they eventually start to cost tax money, so it becomes necessary to import a new lot and so on. I explained this to Pacifico, now I've told you. Pure bullshit, I have just explained it in the most simple of terms, I could show the Chinese infrastructure but it would be pointless and how fast they have built it. Because they really do understand the economics of global politics. Not responding to empty one liners. Explain your reasoning or expect no answers. I'm not second guessing you.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Dec 15, 2022 18:56:34 GMT
Pure bullshit, I have just explained it in the most simple of terms, I could show the Chinese infrastructure but it would be pointless and how fast they have built it. Because they really do understand the economics of global politics. Not responding to empty one liners. Explain your reasoning or expect no answers. I'm not second guessing you. It is written above for you in the most simple of terms possible, you still couldn't understand it and wrote pure bullshit.
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Dec 15, 2022 19:03:10 GMT
That isn't even what you said to another member a minute ago. More irony. Blah blah. I will only respond on subject from now. It's not two weeks since you said you would leave the board until you saw an improvemet to input. Instead you have hung around crying your eyes out when you don't get your way. There are enough people on here with sensible answers, with a better knowledge and understanding than you could ever muster.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Dec 15, 2022 19:15:41 GMT
Blah blah. I will only respond on subject from now. It's not two weeks since you said you would leave the board until you saw an improvemet to input. Instead you have hung around crying your eyes out when you don't get your way. There are enough people on here with sensible answers, with a better knowledge and understanding than you could ever muster. I didn't say I would leave, I said I would choose more carefully who I bothered with. Which I am now doing.
|
|