|
Post by bancroft on Nov 26, 2024 20:02:05 GMT
Not when the stations have to be decommisioned. They run into billions over budget and years longer than predicted.. Yep we have thousands at Sellafield working to ensure the plutonium is not corroding which just goes to show nuclear is not a long term solution especially in a small country. Like you say it costs billions every year.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 26, 2024 20:04:35 GMT
National grid
Myth 1: Clean energy is too expensive
Especially amid a cost of living crisis, there’s a perception that ‘green’ energy is more expensive. But a recent study found that solar and wind energy are now the most affordable sources of new electricity in 82% of the world. Last summer, the government boosted the claim that solar and wind are becoming ever more cheaper than gas, which rose in price substantially following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero’s most recent projections for Britain state that solar output cost now averages £41 per megawatt hour (MWh) from new projects. For new gas power stations, the equivalent lifetime costs will be close to £114 per MWh.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 26, 2024 20:09:54 GMT
I thought it was climate change, when you mention weather to a climate change fanatic they usually talk down to you as though you are a half wit and say “weather and climate change are two different things”. Climate change is caused by Co2, Co2 affects our weather. Glad to help. Climate change is caused by CO2 is an unproven conclusion the evidence for which is diminishing by the day and the predictions that underpin that conclusion by way of models are now widely discredited The weather is the weather and many factors are involved in what we get.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 26, 2024 20:15:25 GMT
Climate change is caused by Co2, Co2 affects our weather. Glad to help. Climate change is caused by CO2 is an unproven conclusion the evidence for which is diminishing by the day and the predictions that underpin that conclusion by way of models are now widely discredited The weather is the weather and many factors are involved in what we get. Oh do give up.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 26, 2024 20:17:47 GMT
And the evidence that CO2 is ruining our air is where exactly? Oh do give up. IPCC, NOAA, NASA, CAS. No specific evidence is presented other than the planet is warming and CO2 is rising. Perhaps it is the Malinkovitch cycles as our orbit entered a more readily warming phase as regards its distance and attitude to the sun just in time to stop the last ice age. There are many factors that corelate nicely with planetary warming. Once again the predictions made are not tying in with the turn of events
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Nov 26, 2024 20:24:33 GMT
I thought it was climate change, when you mention weather to a climate change fanatic they usually talk down to you as though you are a half wit and say “weather and climate change are two different things”. Climate change is caused by Co2 You believe You believe Ditto regards helping.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 26, 2024 20:42:56 GMT
Climate change is caused by CO2 is an unproven conclusion the evidence for which is diminishing by the day and the predictions that underpin that conclusion by way of models are now widely discredited The weather is the weather and many factors are involved in what we get. Oh do give up. Let us just take NASA on the Milankovitch cycles they say Scientific research to better understand the mechanisms that cause changes in Earth’s rotation and how specifically Milankovitch cycles combine to affect climate is ongoing. But the theory that they drive the timing of glacial-interglacial cycles is well accepted. So a theory that has been around since the 19th century and was widely accepted in the 1950s as being accurate has an unknown effect on climate but is agreed has a profound effect on climate as regards predictable glaciation periods yet is confined to almost oblivion when CO2 enters the frame. NASA say these cycles have no effect on the current warming yet make the above statement saying the effect is unknown. Can you understand why scepticism is increasing and why the CO2 conclusion is tottering on its foundations?
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 26, 2024 20:45:46 GMT
Oh do give up. IPCC, NOAA, NASA, CAS. No specific evidence is presented other than the planet is warming and CO2 is rising. Perhaps it is the Malinkovitch cycles as our orbit entered a more readily warming phase as regards its distance and attitude to the sun just in time to stop the last ice age. There are many factors that corelate nicely with planetary warming. Once again the predictions made are not tying in with the turn of events Oh do give up. Malinkovitch cycles. 🤣
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 26, 2024 20:49:52 GMT
Climate change is caused by Co2 You believe You believe Ditto regards helping. Wow, I thought we'd got passed Co2's effect on the Earths temperature. Its interesting to meet someone that far back. Without carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, Earth's average temperature would be around -20°C (-4°F)
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 26, 2024 20:51:06 GMT
No specific evidence is presented other than the planet is warming and CO2 is rising. Perhaps it is the Malinkovitch cycles as our orbit entered a more readily warming phase as regards its distance and attitude to the sun just in time to stop the last ice age. There are many factors that corelate nicely with planetary warming. Once again the predictions made are not tying in with the turn of events Oh do give up. Malinkovitch cycles. 🤣 Am I seeing the debating equivalent of putting ones fingers in one's ears and screaming I can't hear you?
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 26, 2024 21:00:10 GMT
Oh do give up. Malinkovitch cycles. 🤣 Am I seeing the debating equivalent of putting ones fingers in one's ears and screaming I can't hear you? Take your fingers out then.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 26, 2024 21:06:11 GMT
You believe You believe Ditto regards helping. Wow, I thought we'd got passed Co2's effect on the Earths temperature. Its interesting to meet someone that far back. Without carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, Earth's average temperature would be around -20°C (-4°F) But the effect is held to be logarithmic so increases in CO2 will not result in corresponding significant rises in temperature. The questions that exist, and are often dodged, are are the temperatures we measure on land and sea accurate enough to assume a small rise in temperature to one decimal place on a Fahrenheit scale since 19th century, why have the past models not accurately predicted what has transpired, why do the worldwide records not show any increase in the extreme events that have been predicted for over 30 years now, why has climate science eschewed the scientific method by ignoring any evidence that does not confirm their models? Pertinent questions especially the last one as most counter arguments to any sceptical evidence produced tend to attack the individuals involved, or the funding they receive, or the political affiliations they have, or the consensus that exists that has never been proven yet is still referred to as a fact.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 26, 2024 21:10:24 GMT
Am I seeing the debating equivalent of putting ones fingers in one's ears and screaming I can't hear you? Take your fingers out then. But I listen, I investigate what you say, I ask you questions you do not want to hear and cannot answer. The scientific method demands robust counter evidence that the hypothesis queried is sound. The proof seems to be circular and no matter how one looks at other groups they always come back to the IPCC say so.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 26, 2024 21:19:40 GMT
Climate change is caused by Co2, Co2 affects our weather. Glad to help. ZG, have you ever heard of the Roman warm period? It lasted from c250 BC to c400 AD, after this time temperatures cooled slightly and life went on. Then we had the medieval warm period? It lasted from roughly 900 AD to 1300 AD, a period of three or four hundred years during this time temperatures were unusually high. Then guess what happend? That's right, nothing spectacular. Temperatures cooled slightly and for a few hundred years life went on. That is until we entered what became known as the 'Little Ice Age' this was c1650 and for the next 200 years unusually low temperatures were recorded, after which, temperatures stabilised and for a couple of hundred years, life went on. Until now, we are once more in a warming cycle. The above is a matter of fact you can easilly google it. And that's the point. Since before Roman times temperature fluctuation has been a normal part of life on planet Earth, and these cycles typically last for two or three hundred years. What's different this time is the fact that people have the 'benefit' of google and social media. Of course you may believe the Romans had too many coal fired power stations or were keen on fossil fuels, and you have every right to believe that. But tbh, I don't think you're a pillock.
|
|
|
Post by honestjohn on Nov 26, 2024 21:43:10 GMT
You believe You believe Ditto regards helping. Wow, I thought we'd got passed Co2's effect on the Earths temperature. Its interesting to meet someone that far back. Without carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, Earth's average temperature would be around -20°C (-4°F)
I didn't know that. It's a good job we have these greenhouse gases then, eh?
|
|