|
Post by Fairsociety on Nov 3, 2024 21:21:38 GMT
The teenagers of today don't know a Labour regime, they've been brainwashed for the last 15 years which makes them at least 19, they don't know the world under a Labour government, but they are about to find out, and I am sure their parents will be even more shell shocked especially if they are a middle class working family, they will be hammered ... so their little 'darlings' .. will have to do without ... LOL...
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Nov 3, 2024 21:21:50 GMT
how have I proven your point? You are a labour supporter , or shall I say old socialist labour , im not a tory supporter , but can unequivocally say I regard them as the lesser of two evils. how does that prove your point? You seem to be arguing im just as biased for the tories as you are for labour , with the exception that ive never voted for , never mind been a member of the conservative unlike you with labour? I fail to see the equivalence.? Im a scot indy supporter....remember? im standing outside your de facto English two party box , and offering an outside opinion. You on the other hand are standing inside armed with your anti tory bias. Labour are a fucking disaster . We only need to look at Wales after a quarter of a century of devolution where labour have been in charge to see you dont need to be anti labour to see how bad they are at governing. I said the same to you when your mate corbyn was in charge , albeit I regard him as a better leader , more honest , if still a poor politician , than starmer. But the point I was making which you have proven by your own admission of it is that whilst out of the two I still view Labour as the lesser evil, you have always out of the two viewed the Tories as the lesser evil. Whether or not you ever voted for them is irrelevant to that fact. I think the Tories are a lesser evil than the BNP. The fact that I never voted Tory is irrelevant to that. We are both free to offer opinions , but im simply pointing out you are hardly impartial on the matter being a former card carrying Labour Party member and supporter , while im simply saying I can offer an opinion from outside the two party box you seem to be unable to think outside of. The fact you are a lifelong socialist , and former card carrying labour member is very relevant .
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Nov 3, 2024 21:25:28 GMT
The teenagers of today don't know a Labour regime, they've been brainwashed for the last 15 years which makes them at least 19, they don't know the world under a Labour government, but they are about to find out, and I am sure their parents will be even more shell shocked especially if they are a middle class working family, they will be hammered ... so their little 'darlings' .. will have to do without ... LOL... best thing though to teach them. I remember my dad ( Scottish tory) telling me all about labour governments in the seventies. I lost my job three times under labour when they were last in power . you cant imagine the hell of a labour government until you live under one , and only then do you realise .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2024 21:27:23 GMT
No one has ever had a real mandate at Westminster, neither Tory nor Labour, based upon vote share. Your bias is evident in the fact that you appear only to see this as a valid criticism when Labour wins an illegitimate majority. I do not ever recall you making the same criticisms of the Tories. the standard benchmark has normally been 40% of the vote based on a much higher turnout. Starmer took less votes than corbyn did in 2019 , yet won a landslide. Lowest turnout in history , and couldnt even hit ten million voters . While we both agree the fptp system is out of date , even you , in your rose tinted labour glasses cant argue the system isnt now stretched to breaking point. We are a laughing stock , and have the cheek to lecture others on democracy , when labour get two thirds seats on a third of votes. labour have no mandate. Thats clear as we move further into their term in government. When 8/10 didnt vote for you , you know you have real problems . when did the tories get two thirds of seats off the back of a third of votes on such a low turnout? Cameron took a million more votes than starmer did in 2010 , and had to go into coalition to govern. even may and Johnson took 4 to nearly 5 million votes respectively more than starmer did in their various electoral wins. A disgrace to the name of democracy. Simply because I think Labour is a lesser evil than the Tories does not constitute rose tinted glasses. If you think the Tories were any better I suggest you are the one who needs to visit specsavers. Our FPTP voting system has been broken for a long time.....and why should 40 percent be any kind of acceptable benchmark for any kind of majority anyway? And Theresa May got a lot less than that in 2017 anyway. The problem is FPTP itself, not whoever wins by it and by how much. I fail to see why you are trying to paint me as someone who disagrees with the notion that it is utterly broken and has been for a long time. So your apparent desire to portray me as a champion of it just because I see the current incumbents as a lesser evil than the previous lot is utterly misguided. FPTP is a travesty, whoever benefits from it. And there are signs of a groundswell beginning to make an impact, with five left wing independents joining Corbyn who won as an independent, the Greens quadrupling their representation from 1 to 4 and Reform winning 5 seats. If this kind of thing continues there is a slim chance of the two party stitch up being broken from the inside. But it will only happen if large numbers of us vote, but for anyone but Labour or Tory. Staying at home and not bothering at all will never change anything.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2024 21:30:26 GMT
Yours too most like then as well. Time will tell in future voting patterns. I do suspect many are being fooled by what the algorithms are feeding them but lets see. I am far more willing to apologise for being wrong and to change my mind than most when it comes to new facts emerging from such things as measured voting patterns.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2024 21:32:49 GMT
Actually it is evident that most of the votes Reform have eaten up are elderly Tory voters. Even this very forum here is a reflection of that. They probably take a few from Labour but far less. Labour is far more likely to lose support to the Lib Dems or Greens, or SNP up where you are. I cant speak for england , but reform are taking a fair amount of support from younger unionists in places like Ayrshire in scotland. You appear to have forgotten the damage ukip and brexit party did to labours red wall areas. Didnt 62% of labours English constituencies vote for Farage and his party in 2015 , among them many younger voters? and this `article from earlier in the year disagrees with your stereotypical views... www.dazeddigital.com/life-culture/article/63008/1/how-reform-uk-wooed-gen-z-men-britain-nigel-farage-general-electionSome. But it is a statistical fact that a large majority of the young voted Remain whilst a large majority of the old voted Leave
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Nov 3, 2024 21:38:21 GMT
the standard benchmark has normally been 40% of the vote based on a much higher turnout. Starmer took less votes than corbyn did in 2019 , yet won a landslide. Lowest turnout in history , and couldnt even hit ten million voters . While we both agree the fptp system is out of date , even you , in your rose tinted labour glasses cant argue the system isnt now stretched to breaking point. We are a laughing stock , and have the cheek to lecture others on democracy , when labour get two thirds seats on a third of votes. labour have no mandate. Thats clear as we move further into their term in government. When 8/10 didnt vote for you , you know you have real problems . when did the tories get two thirds of seats off the back of a third of votes on such a low turnout? Cameron took a million more votes than starmer did in 2010 , and had to go into coalition to govern. even may and Johnson took 4 to nearly 5 million votes respectively more than starmer did in their various electoral wins. A disgrace to the name of democracy. Simply because I think Labour is a lesser evil than the Tories does not constitute rose tinted glasses. If you think the Tories were any better I suggest you are the one who needs to visit specsavers. Our FPTP voting system has been broken for a long time.....and why should 40 percent be any kind of acceptable benchmark for any kind of majority anyway? And Theresa May got a lot less than that in 2017 anyway. The problem is FPTP itself, not whoever wins by it and by how much. I fail to see why you are trying to paint me as someone who disagrees with the notion that it is utterly broken and has been for a long time. So your apparent desire to portray me as a champion of it just because I see the current incumbents as a lesser evil than the previous lot is utterly misguided. FPTP is a travesty, whoever benefits from it. And there are signs of a groundswell beginning to make an impact, with five left wing independents joining Corbyn who won as an independent, the Greens quadrupling their representation from 1 to 4 and Reform winning 5 seats. If this kind of thing continues there is a slim chance of the two party stitch up being broken from the inside. But it will only happen if large numbers of us vote, but for anyone but Labour or Tory. Staying at home and not bothering at all will never change anything. we will have to agree to disagree then won't we regarding the lesser of two evils. As for the fptp system , im not saying 40 % is an acceptable benchmark , simply that it was the norm at one stage , and that starmer has fallen well short of that , in terms of percentage points , and in terms of millions of voters. I keep saying this is why all hell and fury is being unleashed upon labour , he doesn't have the popular support or mandate to push through policy , he may have the parliamentary numbers , but not the public support. Not sure what you arent understanding about this? We were told by labour themselves Corby's 2019 result was the worst labour result in history. Starmer took half a million votes less. Cant you see how labour are responsible for delegitimising their own election result in 2024? I never stay at home Steve. I always vote. It's time English labour give the good people of england the same opportunity they gave to us Scots , irish and welsh ,and bring in a proportional system. Of course labour won't , as they are too chickenshit and have no backbone. Not to mention a proportional system would flag up the truth about labours lack of real democratic support that fptp masks anti democratically by dishing out two thirds of seats on a third of the vote. I cant recall any country in the so called civilised west going through such a farce of a voting system. no mandate labour only win when people stay at home , and its a lesson I hope Joe Public learns well over the next five years.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2024 21:40:01 GMT
But the point I was making which you have proven by your own admission of it is that whilst out of the two I still view Labour as the lesser evil, you have always out of the two viewed the Tories as the lesser evil. Whether or not you ever voted for them is irrelevant to that fact. I think the Tories are a lesser evil than the BNP. The fact that I never voted Tory is irrelevant to that. We are both free to offer opinions , but im simply pointing out you are hardly impartial on the matter being a former card carrying Labour Party member and supporter , while im simply saying I can offer an opinion from outside the two party box you seem to be unable to think outside of. The fact you are a lifelong socialist , and former card carrying labour member is very relevant . The fact that I am not a card carrying member anymore nor even a Labour voter whilst still being a left winger is rather more relevant. I see Labour as a lesser evil than the Tories. The fact that you see the Tories as a lesser evil than Labour says as much about your own bias in the opposite direction regardless of voting patterns. The big difference is that you have a massive Independence for Scotland agenda whilst I have nothing similar. It is thus likely to be the case that only the option of voting SNP saved you from the taint of voting Tory. Though I do seem to recall you once admitting that you yourself voted Labour in 1997. So whilst neither of us have ever voted Tory, both of us have voted Labour in the past. Who'd have thought it, lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2024 21:50:32 GMT
Simply because I think Labour is a lesser evil than the Tories does not constitute rose tinted glasses. If you think the Tories were any better I suggest you are the one who needs to visit specsavers. Our FPTP voting system has been broken for a long time.....and why should 40 percent be any kind of acceptable benchmark for any kind of majority anyway? And Theresa May got a lot less than that in 2017 anyway. The problem is FPTP itself, not whoever wins by it and by how much. I fail to see why you are trying to paint me as someone who disagrees with the notion that it is utterly broken and has been for a long time. So your apparent desire to portray me as a champion of it just because I see the current incumbents as a lesser evil than the previous lot is utterly misguided. FPTP is a travesty, whoever benefits from it. And there are signs of a groundswell beginning to make an impact, with five left wing independents joining Corbyn who won as an independent, the Greens quadrupling their representation from 1 to 4 and Reform winning 5 seats. If this kind of thing continues there is a slim chance of the two party stitch up being broken from the inside. But it will only happen if large numbers of us vote, but for anyone but Labour or Tory. Staying at home and not bothering at all will never change anything. we will have to agree to disagree then won't we regarding the lesser of two evils. As for the fptp system , im not saying 40 % is an acceptable benchmark , simply that it was the norm at one stage , and that starmer has fallen well short of that , in terms of percentage points , and in terms of millions of voters. I keep saying this is why all hell and fury is being unleashed upon labour , he doesn't have the popular support or mandate to push through policy , he may have the parliamentary numbers , but not the public support. Not sure what you arent understanding about this? We were told by labour themselves Corby's 2019 result was the worst labour result in history. Starmer took half a million votes less. Cant you see how labour are responsible for delegitimising their own election result in 2024? I never stay at home Steve. I always vote. It's time English labour give the good people of england the same opportunity they gave to us Scots , irish and welsh ,and bring in a proportional system. Of course labour won't , as they are too chickenshit and have no backbone. Not to mention a proportional system would flag up the truth about labours lack of real democratic support that fptp masks anti democratically by dishing out two thirds of seats on a third of the vote. I cant recall any country in the so called civilised west going through such a farce of a voting system. no mandate labour only win when people stay at home , and its a lesson I hope Joe Public learns well over the next five years. Anyway, early start for me tomorrow so time to turn in. So let us part for the evening on a friendly and jocular note. The point you make about Starmer getting so many fewer votes than Corbyn is one I love winding some of my former comrades up with when they go on about the worst result in their history. The crap they come out with in an attempt to explain away this inconvenient truth is invariably rather entertaining. I have an advantage over you in that I can remember many of their names locally - having known them personally - and thus find them easy to locate and wind up on FB. I have a private game I like to play to see how many end up blocking me. It is into double figures now, lol. They really don't handle inconvenient facts very well at all, especially when they shoot down their preferred bullshit mantras. Anyway, goodnight to you, and best wishes.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Nov 3, 2024 22:01:18 GMT
Actually it is evident that most of the votes Reform have eaten up are elderly Tory voters. Even this very forum here is a reflection of that. They probably take a few from Labour but far less. Labour is far more likely to lose support to the Lib Dems or Greens, or SNP up where you are. I cant speak for england , but reform are taking a fair amount of support from younger unionists in places like Ayrshire in scotland. You appear to have forgotten the damage ukip and brexit party did to labours red wall areas. Didnt 62% of labours English constituencies vote for Farage and his party in 2015 , among them many younger voters? and this `article from earlier in the year disagrees with your stereotypical views... www.dazeddigital.com/life-culture/article/63008/1/how-reform-uk-wooed-gen-z-men-britain-nigel-farage-general-electionThat agrees with my observations in Plymouth. It's a very English place.
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Nov 4, 2024 7:55:28 GMT
That agrees with my observations in Plymouth. It's a very English place. many labour voters like to stereotype people , or put everyone into these little political niches to suit their own prejudices and worldview. This isnt necessarily aimed at mr Benn , but you can see this in action with the likes of see 2 , describing everyone who doesn't agree with him as far right , implying they are extremist etc etc. reform came second to labour in 89 seats , two thirds of which were in the red wall areas. Clearly they are a massive threat to labour as I explained to Steve earlier. more young people under 30 voted reform uk than voted tory , with something like 10 % voting for the party. The idea reform are simply taking the blue rinse vote off the tories in south east england is of course delusional. How any youngster can vote labour in england is beyond me , when you consider this is the party that saddled Englands young with tuition fees , and placed house prices out of the reach of the young , and are now attacking the young and low paid with their regressive budget.
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Nov 4, 2024 8:03:10 GMT
We are both free to offer opinions , but im simply pointing out you are hardly impartial on the matter being a former card carrying Labour Party member and supporter , while im simply saying I can offer an opinion from outside the two party box you seem to be unable to think outside of. The fact you are a lifelong socialist , and former card carrying labour member is very relevant . The fact that I am not a card carrying member anymore nor even a Labour voter whilst still being a left winger is rather more relevant. I see Labour as a lesser evil than the Tories. The fact that you see the Tories as a lesser evil than Labour says as much about your own bias in the opposite direction regardless of voting patterns. The big difference is that you have a massive Independence for Scotland agenda whilst I have nothing similar. It is thus likely to be the case that only the option of voting SNP saved you from the taint of voting Tory. Though I do seem to recall you once admitting that you yourself voted Labour in 1997. So whilst neither of us have ever voted Tory, both of us have voted Labour in the past. Who'd have thought it, lol Steve , we are going around in circles. Can you point out where , in any post of mine , I have claimed to be unbiased? All I pointed out was I dont vote labour or tory , and increasingly many on here appear to be the same. I also pointed out , despite never being a tory voter , unlike you with labour ( I also formerly voted labour) in my opinion the tories are the lesser evil. It's a personal observation you cant seem to accept or deal with. Thats not my problem though. and? In the light of the context of our discussion , whats the relevance? Both labour and tory are of course unionist parties , especially the tories , but I regard them as the lesser evil. eh? I havent voted snp for a number of recent Westminster elections , and I have repeated my stance many a time that in an indy scotland , I would not under any circumstance vote for them. Unlike you , im not wedded to party ideology , but I am a floating voter , voting in what I see as my best interests. If a Scottish tory party existed , that were committed to Scottish indy , then of course I would consider them , as I would any party with Scotlands interests at heart. Unlike you , im not blinded by ideology in terms of left. and right politics.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Nov 4, 2024 8:07:11 GMT
Some. But it is a statistical fact that a large majority of the young voted Remain whilst a large majority of the old voted Leave Those without experience voted in ignorance. Those with experience voted without ignorance. Decades of experience shaped my vote. If the EU had reformed it would have been different, but it didn't. It left me expecting things to carry on badly if we'd stayed. Thank goodness I wasn't alone. Thank goodness we left.
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Nov 4, 2024 8:12:04 GMT
we will have to agree to disagree then won't we regarding the lesser of two evils. As for the fptp system , im not saying 40 % is an acceptable benchmark , simply that it was the norm at one stage , and that starmer has fallen well short of that , in terms of percentage points , and in terms of millions of voters. I keep saying this is why all hell and fury is being unleashed upon labour , he doesn't have the popular support or mandate to push through policy , he may have the parliamentary numbers , but not the public support. Not sure what you arent understanding about this? We were told by labour themselves Corby's 2019 result was the worst labour result in history. Starmer took half a million votes less. Cant you see how labour are responsible for delegitimising their own election result in 2024? I never stay at home Steve. I always vote. It's time English labour give the good people of england the same opportunity they gave to us Scots , irish and welsh ,and bring in a proportional system. Of course labour won't , as they are too chickenshit and have no backbone. Not to mention a proportional system would flag up the truth about labours lack of real democratic support that fptp masks anti democratically by dishing out two thirds of seats on a third of the vote. I cant recall any country in the so called civilised west going through such a farce of a voting system. no mandate labour only win when people stay at home , and its a lesson I hope Joe Public learns well over the next five years. Anyway, early start for me tomorrow so time to turn in. So let us part for the evening on a friendly and jocular note. The point you make about Starmer getting so many fewer votes than Corbyn is one I love winding some of my former comrades up with when they go on about the worst result in their history. The crap they come out with in an attempt to explain away this inconvenient truth is invariably rather entertaining. I have an advantage over you in that I can remember many of their names locally - having known them personally - and thus find them easy to locate and wind up on FB. I have a private game I like to play to see how many end up blocking me. It is into double figures now, lol. They really don't handle inconvenient facts very well at all, especially when they shoot down their preferred bullshit mantras. Anyway, goodnight to you, and best wishes. Steve you take debating too seriously. I have told you this before. We are all adults here , and we can debate toe to toe , and stand under our banners without going off in a huff. I stand by everything I have said about labour , and we are witnessing the latest labour disaster play out at Westminster yet again. I suspect by the end of labours time in power , we will have unemployment through the roof , potentially the uk close to being bankrupt , hundreds of billions in yet more PFI debt hidden away for future generations to pay back , and yet more damage to the fabric of society in both scotland and england. we have just had an extremely regressive budget from that clown reeve , not content with taking money away from the elderly in terms of heating allowance , she has also punished small and medium business not to mention the outrage of the farming community across the uk. Even the BMA in scotland and uk wide are angered about the ENIC rises . archive.is/bM8Ib archive.is/DYock
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Nov 4, 2024 8:17:33 GMT
Some. But it is a statistical fact that a large majority of the young voted Remain whilst a large majority of the old voted Leave that was 8 years ago Steve , and starmer is committed to brexit. Labour have massively backed and supported the tories Freeport's across the uk , which are contrary to EU rules and customs , with each freeport zone gaining hundreds of millions in government subsidies , and typically 25 year licences , all of which puts barriers up against rejoining the EU. So why would a young pro EU person want to vote labour?
|
|