The Dark Legend, a pointer?

Nonsense ^^. It is not for me to define Far-Right or otherwise. Far-Right is a well established term, as too is Far-Left. If you and or others are not aware of that then I wonder what you are doing debating politics.

The German's see the AfG as far-right so who are we to question them?

IMO it is only those who wish to defend the Far-Right who question the term. 

Actually it is incumbent on you to show how they are 'far right'  just as it is incumbent on me to show that they are not. I have referred to policies and reviewed their policies and have asked what makes them 'far right' even as a starting point. You call them far right but do not indicate why other than to say lots of Germans do the same. Lots of people say would of instead of would have or accept instead of except. Just because lots of people do it does not make it right, getting it right or wrong is not a consensus argument it is one of  being able to show how one is factually correct. You accept that the Germans call them far right but seem unable to explain in any size shape or form why you accept that description and what it is the AfD do or say that fits the far right label so eagerly affixed.

You made the claim that they are far right and expect people just to accept your word that you are right.  I have not said they are not far right what I have asked is what is it that makes them far right. I could find nothing in their policies that could lead to the conclusion that they are far right.So far you have said they are far right and you back it up by saying lots of Germans say they are, I say they are, it is self evident they are, they lie, history tells us and if people do not understand what far right is then what are they doing debating on a politics forum. None of which of course tells us what is far right as regards the AfD. So what is it about the AfD that makes them far right? 

You're not only unable to define it, you rely on telling lies to smear people with it.  This is all your posts tell us.

If this is the only way you can get attention then you must be one sad little man.

I accept the reality that the term exists for a reason, and I advise against people naively sliding into the danger areas of the far-right, dangerous as shown in history. So no matter how you put it, the evidence is out there for you to ponder upon, without hounding me.

None of which alters MY CHOICE not to define the Far-Right, especially when history does an excellent job of already doing it. 

My politics cover some of the left of center politics and some of the right of center politics, what's your political position?

Of course the term exists it is used in the modern day setting as a form of abuse and as a means to denigrate and where possible delegitimise parties and individuals seeking a democratic mandate. It is a name is supposed to conjure up from history Nazis, authoritarianism, racism and genocide and is clearly supposed to create fear in those who may consider voting for those so labelled. All who so label others seem to either 'choose' or refuse to define how they know that the X party, whoever they may be, are far right but wish everyone to rest assured 'they know' as they not only have political nous but are honest men. It is a very superior attitude that does not deliver the goods and gradually people are seeing through it.
My politics are to the left in a National/ethnic setting which makes me for many, who seem to hark back to the Comintern, of the right. Suffice to say we cannot save the world nor should we try but we can save the UK in the same way Germans are trying to save Germany, Hungarians trying to save Hungary and Italians trying to save Italy.