The Dark Legend, a pointer?

Not so, my opening comment was as regards the basis of the  'investigation' and the link to 'prove' that any group were far right based on a BBC investigation. This is the same BBC than managed to ignore accusations of widespread rape of young vulnerable girls and acted  to see those making such accusations in court as racists and hate mongers in a similar investigation; the same BBC that cannot call a terrorist a terrorist and produce mealy mouthed totally inaccurate reasons as to why not, that any half interested person could put their fingers on as rampant hypocrisy; the same BBC who are supposed to 'assess' scientific and political reports as they are produced and rarely assess any that indicate badness or extremism from the right or that climate change is going to end the world shortly; the same BBC that overloaded stories of Brexit disaster imminent before and after the referendum and loaded all discussion with Remain advocates. I did however give you the good grace of reading it and assessing what it said and made comments accordingly I was hoping for the good grace to be reciprocated, in vain it seems
People have lost trust in the BBC based on experience over the last twenty to thirty years and some of the above are reasons why. Many people have been on the ground at various events and observed that editorially how the BBC present a situation was often at odds with personal experience. So a BBC investigation risks not being an unbiased investigation it starts as an investigation find a specific circumstance and report that alone. As I said if I searched specifically for a Muslim extremist supporter in the Labour party I would probably find it but that is not an investigation of the  Labour party and I would be disingenuous if I said it was.

Once again we have to ask what makes any trend 'Right'? I do not know. It seems to be caring about one's home nation and not wishing it to be overrun with people from other countries to the detriment of the home culture and the existing population. Is that what you mean? Is that the 'right trend'?

Please stop making your immature excuses for Rightism, history proves just how immature and naive you are when it comes to Far Right politics. It is clear you wish to ignore that reality making any attempt at grown up debate with you a waste of time.

More excuses by a Rightist ^^ which is why I don't buy the nonsense you post. 

You can fool yourself, but you cannot change history.

If a party is 'far right', you would have thought it would be a simple matter to find either three policies that are very right wing or, alternatively, one policy that is extremely right wing.

Labeling moderate-ish parties as extreme is a tactic used by extremists themselves.

I did and they don't state any AfD policy which is far-right. 

The dishonesty in this discussion lies firmly at your door. You go round banding anyone far-right without any shred of evidence, then when pushed you say the 'German people say they are, so take it up with them'. And then when you are found wanting you start banding names like Galtieri, Pinochet, France and Hitler about - how do these figures correlate with what is only your assertion based on 'what the German people say' with the AfD party?

If we are so naive, and you are so superior in spotting these far-right extremists, and as Sandy has asked you numerous times what are we supposed to be looking for when playing 'thought police'? As so far, you have no shred of evidence that the party are far-right. Their policies seem sound enough and not too controversial to be democratic enough to vote for. Please, lead us out of our naivety and show us what you allegedly know.