|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 13, 2024 18:38:18 GMT
Hitler was a National Socialist Lefties don't like being reminded of that fact Yep, but they do like to try and distance themselves from him. They just call it far-right a million times, like they call everyone else far-right. Yet, they can't seem to find any examples today. Here a example of the far-right today The proscribed National youth Action group Do you agree rebirth-Dalta-B4 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2024 19:21:43 GMT
Now Labour MP demanding another Labour MP is suspended... ..popcorn out..   Rosie Duffield sounds like something out of Prisoner Cell Block H. Labour women are generally quite rough and unsavoury. Still, karma often gets them when they mouth off like this.
|
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on May 13, 2024 19:51:03 GMT
....Oh, and Hitler was real... ...dumbfuck. Hero of yours was he? You share many of the same beliefs. Do I? Go on, Max Maven, what - exactly - do I believe that Hitler also believed? All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on May 13, 2024 20:13:32 GMT
Hitler was a National Socialist Lefties don't like being reminded of that fact One of Hitler's early moves was to join the German Workers Union. Once a member he encouraged people like himself to join, eventually taking control and turning it into "German Workers Party". Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org › wiki › German_Workers'_Party The German Workers' Party (German: Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, DAP) was a short-lived far-right political party established in Weimar Germany after World War I. It only lasted from 5 January 1919 until 24 February 1920. The DAP was the precursor of the Nazi Party, which was officially known as the National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP). All Hitler's early dealing and backing backed up the activity of the Fascists of the day. You can get all the information you need by Googling his rise to power. Righties don't like to know the reality. Why on earth do you persist in quoting wiki? Anyone can change wiki - it has no integrity whatsoever Continuing to quote it makes you look even sillier than ever |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on May 13, 2024 20:37:15 GMT
One of Hitler's early moves was to join the German Workers Union. Once a member he encouraged people like himself to join, eventually taking control and turning it into "German Workers Party". Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org › wiki › German_Workers'_Party The German Workers' Party (German: Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, DAP) was a short-lived far-right political party established in Weimar Germany after World War I. It only lasted from 5 January 1919 until 24 February 1920. The DAP was the precursor of the Nazi Party, which was officially known as the National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP). All Hitler's early dealing and backing backed up the activity of the Fascists of the day. You can get all the information you need by Googling his rise to power. Righties don't like to know the reality. Why on earth do you persist in quoting wiki? Anyone can change wiki - it has no integrity whatsoeverContinuing to quote it makes you look even sillier than ever What makes you say that? The reason Wiki tends to work is because more people care about the truth than care about propaganda. While it should not be used as a standalone source it is perfectly fine as a source for a general overview. Attacking a point because it comes from Wikipedia is a classic case of "attacking the messenger, not the message" - it is arguable one of the weakest, and most intellectually vacuous, debating methods. The source matters not if the message is demonstrably accurate. Hitler's use of "socialist" is akin to the use of the word "republic" in the official title of so many dictatorships; it is designed to fool the foolish, and it works, as demonstrated here on an almost daily basis. What something is called is wholly irrelevant, what it does is what matters. If enough people falsely called this:   A hammer, it still wouldn't knock fucking nails in, because despite the name it is not actually one of these:  Form & Function are infinitely more important than label. All The Best |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2024 20:40:52 GMT
Bananas and hammers images. We must be at the bottom of the barrel.
Rosie Duffield seems to be one of the more sensible Labour MPs. She knows what a woman is, for a start.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 13, 2024 21:23:01 GMT
One of Hitler's early moves was to join the German Workers Union. Once a member he encouraged people like himself to join, eventually taking control and turning it into "German Workers Party". Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org › wiki › German_Workers'_Party The German Workers' Party (German: Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, DAP) was a short-lived far-right political party established in Weimar Germany after World War I. It only lasted from 5 January 1919 until 24 February 1920. The DAP was the precursor of the Nazi Party, which was officially known as the National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP). All Hitler's early dealing and backing backed up the activity of the Fascists of the day. You can get all the information you need by Googling his rise to power. Righties don't like to know the reality. Why on earth do you persist in quoting wiki? Anyone can change wiki - it has no integrity whatsoever Continuing to quote it makes you look even sillier than ever I don't, why on earth do you post such silly untruthful nonsense? I know, but in this case I was already aware of the Wiki comment due to my own personal research over the years. Your last comment shows that you have no answer to the realities in my post, in other words, all you have is your inbred ignorance and political bias on this issue. Thanks for proving my point that 'Righties don't like to know the reality'. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 13, 2024 21:38:28 GMT
Now Labour MP demanding another Labour MP is suspended... ..popcorn out.. AFAIA, Elphicke has no intention of standing as a Labour member in any future election. Funny old world where Elphicke can be guilty of all sorts for over a year as a Tory MP and a Labour member picks on her for joining Labour for a while. And she gets all the negative attention and opinion now. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 13, 2024 21:40:52 GMT
Now Labour MP demanding another Labour MP is suspended... ..popcorn out.. AFAIA, Elphicke has no intention of standing as a Labour member in any future election. Funny old world where Elphicke can be guilty of all sorts for over a year as a Tory MP and a Labour member picks on her for joining Labour for a while. And she gets all the negative attention and opinion now. Hey - don't complain to me. It is your Party who wanted her as one of their MP's. Own it. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 13, 2024 21:48:32 GMT
AFAIA, Elphicke has no intention of standing as a Labour member in any future election. Funny old world where Elphicke can be guilty of all sorts for over a year as a Tory MP and a Labour member picks on her for joining Labour for a while. And she gets all the negative attention and opinion now. Hey - don't complain to me. It is your Party who wanted her as one of their MP's. Own it. Hey don't lie about me, I am not complaining to anyone about Elphicke, just raising an obvious point. It was HER decision to change parties. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 13, 2024 21:51:22 GMT
Hey - don't complain to me. It is your Party who wanted her as one of their MP's. Own it. Hey don't lie about me, I am not complaining to anyone about Elphicke, just raising an obvious point. It was HER decision to change parties. It was Labours to welcome her in with open arms.. Own it.. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on May 13, 2024 23:59:03 GMT
Now Labour MP demanding another Labour MP is suspended... ..popcorn out.. AFAIA, Elphicke has no intention of standing as a Labour member in any future election. Funny old world where Elphicke can be guilty of all sorts for over a year as a Tory MP and a Labour member picks on her for joining Labour for a while. And she gets all the negative attention and opinion now. She should never have been allowed to join the PLP. Starmer only allowed her to do so to score a point against Sunak, and it has spectacularly backfired; with even fewer people believing that Starmer has any political principles at all other than obtaining power. My father, ever the political sceptic, was on the verge of returning his vote to Labour (that they lost when Blair betrayed the Working Class with his policies on the EU and open door immigration) because he thought (in vain I told him. and I was right) that he was beginning to see clear water between New-New-Tory-Lite-Labour and the actual Tories. Starmer cosying up to Elphicke just so he could smile smugly at Sunak over the dispatch boxes scuppered that - he'll now be voting either Independent or spoiling his ballot - either case it is effectively a vote for the Tories in my father's constituency. Well done Starmer - your serial lack of political principles and perpetual inability to gauge the public mood outside of the Westminster bubble has lost you another vote. All The Best |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2024 0:46:32 GMT
One of Hitler's early moves was to join the German Workers Union. Once a member he encouraged people like himself to join, eventually taking control and turning it into "German Workers Party". Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org › wiki › German_Workers'_Party The German Workers' Party (German: Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, DAP) was a short-lived far-right political party established in Weimar Germany after World War I. It only lasted from 5 January 1919 until 24 February 1920. The DAP was the precursor of the Nazi Party, which was officially known as the National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP). All Hitler's early dealing and backing backed up the activity of the Fascists of the day. You can get all the information you need by Googling his rise to power. Righties don't like to know the reality. Why on earth do you persist in quoting wiki? Anyone can change wiki - it has no integrity whatsoever Continuing to quote it makes you look even sillier than ever The entry was probably made by a Communist - the far-left ultra authoritarian dictatorship that killed tens of millions of people. Nazism and Fascism were both collectivist and variations of socialism. Basically, they were in competition with each other and going for the same audience. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 14, 2024 1:11:28 GMT
Why on earth do you persist in quoting wiki? Anyone can change wiki - it has no integrity whatsoever Continuing to quote it makes you look even sillier than ever I don't, why on earth do you post such silly untruthful nonsense? I know, but in this case I was already aware of the Wiki comment due to my own personal research over the years. Your last comment shows that you have no answer to the realities in my post, in other words, all you have is your inbred ignorance and political bias on this issue. Thanks for proving my point that 'Righties don't like to know the reality'. I don't think anyone is suggesting that you are editing wiki, but wiki can be and is edited which is why it's veracity can be and often is questioned. Tell me, what reality in your opinion, don't 'righties' know? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2024 1:24:18 GMT
I don't, why on earth do you post such silly untruthful nonsense? I know, but in this case I was already aware of the Wiki comment due to my own personal research over the years. Your last comment shows that you have no answer to the realities in my post, in other words, all you have is your inbred ignorance and political bias on this issue. Thanks for proving my point that 'Righties don't like to know the reality'. I don't think anyone is suggesting that you are editing wiki, but wiki can be and is edited which is why it's veracity can be and often is questioned. Tell me, what reality in your opinion, don't 'righties' know? I personally wouldn't use it for anything serious. I don't even think I could consider it a secondary source - it lacks sufficient scrutiny.
EDIT: sadly, the forum has its retarded liar trolls on deaths door, so it's sort of a bad place for a valued discussion.
|
|
