|
|
Post by ProVeritas on May 8, 2024 14:53:56 GMT
Islamists take votes away from Labour. Greens from both parties. Reform might take votes from Labour in the north. Hung parliament is a possibility and if so deals will need to be done. Given that there really is bugger all difference between the Tories and Stamer's New-New-Tory-Lite-Labour then a hung parliament may well be the best outcome. Because neither the Tories nor Labour will form a coalition with the other; meaning one or more of the other smaller, but invariably more progressive thinking, parties could end up as "king-maker". IMO that could be better than an outright win for either Labour or the Tories. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 8, 2024 17:59:08 GMT
LOL - a semi-literate simpleton, who is protesting for a Hamas apologist, literally accused me of apologising for Islamic terrorism. Hilarious, but as we can see they lie through their teeth. The 7/7 bombers were motivated by al-Qaeda and used Tony Blair's invasion of Iraq and the war in Afghanstan as the excuse for their terrorist attacks, despite the fact that these wars followed from the Islamic terrorist attack on 9/11. You can find this on wikipedia. Tony Blair opened the borders to Islamists, engaged in a war on terror, balkanised the UK and used the Left to attack the British people who objected to the Islamification of the UK, which is now a reality in politics. Islamic terrorists kill people. Other people respond. More Islamic terrorists kill people using the previous response as the excuse. Repeat cycle. Two of the 7/7 "Islamic terrorists" were from Leeds, England. The same Leeds that has just elected the Green Party's Islamist councillor who declared his victory a victory for Gaza, whilst shouting "Allahu Akbar". www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13384283/Moment-Green-Party-councillor-shouts-Allahu-Akbar-elected-Leeds-declares-victory-win-people-Gaza.htmlThis is what the establishment parties have created, which is something that was predicted would happen many years ago. Of course, the Left (IslamoLeft) simply attacked the people who were trying to address this growing concern. There you are islamist Apoligiest blaming Blair for 7/7 . Can someone give the islamist Apologists . Fool a education Some one saying the IDF should wipe out hammas how can they be a Hammas Apologists lol . By saying that isreal shouldn't indiscriminately bome and cut of water and cut off water supplies plus restrict Human Aid Is a person who dosent support Grenoside Goebbels = Rebirth |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 8, 2024 18:10:50 GMT
The only Tory Metro Mayor to hang on was Ben Houchen, who had a massive popular vote thanks to implementing a traditional LABOUR policy of taking transport into public ownership ( Buying Teesside Airport ). Houchen had a 73% share of the vote in 2021, however his share of the vote plummeted last week by 19%, and Labours share shot up by 14%. If a similar swing were to be replecated in the general election, the Conservatives would lose all 5 seats they currently hold in the area, three of which require a swing of only around 5% for the Tories to lose them. Also Manchester Airport is Manchester District councils owed we all know how popular that air port is . |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 8, 2024 18:13:16 GMT
Blair illegally invaded Iraq.
Blair didn't take the threat of Islamists seriously until after 9/11.
His government tolerated Abu Qatada, Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudhary whilst treating the likes of Geert Wilders as terrorists and refusing to allow such people into the UK to speak. Anyone who criticised Islam was regarded as an Islamophobe, or a racist, rather than a human being with an open mind.
Militant salafism went unchallenged.
Saudi Arabian sponsorship of salafist ideology was ignored and became prevalent in British mosques.
52 innocent people were killed and 784 were injured by men who worked at a Saudi Arabian sponsored Islamic bookshop.
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 8, 2024 18:23:55 GMT
Poor old fiddles you have to admire his pesistence in making a total prick of himself... Are you incapable of debate, or of putting forward any political opinion without resorting to offensive or insulting remarks. ? It's not . |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 8, 2024 18:36:03 GMT
^^ Either lives in an alternate universe or is brainwashed by his own lies. islamists. Islamists everywhere. islamists. Islamists everywhere. Scotland's George Galloway certainly thinks so. So you think all them that voted For Galloway party are all is islamist There coming to take me away ha ha he.he |
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on May 9, 2024 10:22:59 GMT
Islamists take votes away from Labour. Greens from both parties. Reform might take votes from Labour in the north. Hung parliament is a possibility and if so deals will need to be done. Given that there really is bugger all difference between the Tories and Stamer's New-New-Tory-Lite-Labour then a hung parliament may well be the best outcome. Because neither the Tories nor Labour will form a coalition with the other; meaning one or more of the other smaller, but invariably more progressive thinking, parties could end up as "king-maker". IMO that could be better than an outright win for either Labour or the Tories. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on May 9, 2024 10:26:02 GMT
Islamists take votes away from Labour. Greens from both parties. Reform might take votes from Labour in the north. Hung parliament is a possibility and if so deals will need to be done. Given that there really is bugger all difference between the Tories and Stamer's New-New-Tory-Lite-Labour then a hung parliament may well be the best outcome. Because neither the Tories nor Labour will form a coalition with the other; meaning one or more of the other smaller, but invariably more progressive thinking, parties could end up as "king-maker". IMO that could be better than an outright win for either Labour or the Tories. All The Best I personally think the only thing they agree on is foreign policy, the other is keeping the economy afloat. Everything else is very different and Labour believe in big government rather than personal responsibility so they are very different. |
|
|
|
Post by om15 on May 9, 2024 10:31:51 GMT
Like in Scotland?, look how well that turned out, having lunatic minority anywhere near Government results in a terrible mess. I think the last thing we need is a "progressive" thinking party, unless you wish to give power to deviants and eco maniacs of course.
|
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on May 9, 2024 20:11:39 GMT
Like in Scotland?, look how well that turned out, having lunatic minority anywhere near Government results in a terrible mess. I think the last thing we need is a "progressive" thinking party, unless you wish to give power to deviants and eco maniacs of course. But far less of a mess than when you have a lunatic majority. Does the name Liz Truss ring any bells, other than alarm bells across global financial markets? Heck, Johnson was only saved from being revealed as the swivel-eyed loon he clearly is by having to reign in the lunacy and deal with Covid. A Johnson majority unrestrained by the perils of Covid would have been almost as much of a disaster as Truss was. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on May 10, 2024 7:29:52 GMT
false equation there. You might not agree with the governments of either Israel or scotland , but you can't decide that those who voted them in dont support the general governance and its quality. But that is no different from FPTP - those that vote for the majority party that gets into power tend to be happier than those that don't. I'm talking about the quality of governance - and by no stretch of the imagination could anyone claim that governance in Scotland has been better than anywhere else in the UK. We Scots are best placed to judge the merits of devolution and our own parliament compared to your uk parliament at Westminster where we can judge the governance of both over the last quarter of a century. So why is it in poll after poll , vote after vote , over the last 25 years , Scots prefer Holyrood to Westminster governance , think the Scottish Parliament has largely performed better at tackling the devolved issues than what Westminster would , and a majority of Scots want more powers for the Scottish Parliament if Holyrood is just as crap as Westminster? As ive told Vinny for year s, why is it on average barely 8% of Scots want to scrap Holyrood , and even among unionists , the majority prefer Holyrood governance to Westminster? www.whatscotlandthinks.org/questions/how-should-scotland-be-governed-five-response-categories-collapsed-to-three/ |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2024 7:34:44 GMT
Bless, they've even got a website to tell them what to think.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 10, 2024 7:37:03 GMT
But that is no different from FPTP - those that vote for the majority party that gets into power tend to be happier than those that don't. I'm talking about the quality of governance - and by no stretch of the imagination could anyone claim that governance in Scotland has been better than anywhere else in the UK. We Scots are best placed to judge the merits of devolution and our own parliament compared to your uk parliament at Westminster where we can judge the governance of both over the last quarter of a century. So why is it in poll after poll , vote after vote , over the last 25 years , Scots prefer Holyrood to Westminster governance , think the Scottish Parliament has largely performed better at tackling the devolved issues than what Westminster would , and a majority of Scots want more powers for the Scottish Parliament if Holyrood is just as crap as Westminster? As ive told Vinny for year s, why is it on average barely 8% of Scots want to scrap Holyrood , and even among unionists , the majority prefer Holyrood governance to Westminster? www.whatscotlandthinks.org/questions/how-should-scotland-be-governed-five-response-categories-collapsed-to-three/ What policies from the Scottish Government do you feel have been a success? |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on May 10, 2024 7:38:06 GMT
Bless, they've even got a website to tell them what to think. I bet you have never even heard of professor John Curtice. Islamists. islamists everywhere. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2024 7:43:35 GMT
Bless, they've even got a website to tell them what to think. I bet you have never even heard of professor John Curtice. Islamists. islamists everywhere. It's OK, I can see you're incapable of thinking for yourself, which is why you're mimicking Labour's TTL.  Also, you're openly anti-English semi-Irish and not even a real Scot. |
|
Also, you're openly anti-English semi-Irish and not even a real Scot.