Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2022 13:23:10 GMT
Interesting point of view. Perhaps you could explain how Spain with a warmer climate, which had very severe lockdown and masking policies, even forcing people to wear masks on beaches, had a death rate of 2469, compared to Sweden's 2038. Maybe it was their custom of kissing people on both cheeks. Maybe it was because these measures are arbitrary and ineffective.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 12, 2022 13:35:40 GMT
They were not following anyone's recommendations in Jan 2020. Stop trying to make excuses. Don't be daft - the Government was following SAGE recommendations with the full support of the Labour Party Is that deliberate obtusity or are you just that desperate to defend Boris' mistakes in January 2020 ?? ??
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 12, 2022 13:52:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 12, 2022 17:00:56 GMT
Well done - and now try reading it. "NERVTAG does not advise port of entry screening, irrespective of the current limited understanding of the epidemiology." "There are no practical preventative actions that HMG might undertake ahead of Chinese New Year"
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Nov 12, 2022 17:45:34 GMT
Interesting point of view. Perhaps you could explain how Spain with a warmer climate, which had very severe lockdown and masking policies, even forcing people to wear masks on beaches, had a death rate of 2469, compared to Sweden's 2038. Maybe it was their custom of kissing people on both cheeks. Maybe it was because these measures are arbitrary and ineffective. Well for a start the epidemic started earlier in Spain (and Italy). We had the chance to see what was happening there and act. Spain has a density of 94 per km 2 Sweden less than a third of that just 25 2 and population density makes a huge difference as we with our ~3 times Spain's suffered.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2022 18:33:35 GMT
Interesting point of view. Perhaps you could explain how Spain with a warmer climate, which had very severe lockdown and masking policies, even forcing people to wear masks on beaches, had a death rate of 2469, compared to Sweden's 2038. Maybe it was their custom of kissing people on both cheeks. Maybe it was because these measures are arbitrary and ineffective. Well for a start the epidemic started earlier in Spain (and Italy). We had the chance to see what was happening there and act. Spain has a density of 94 per km 2 Sweden less than a third of that just 25 2 and population density makes a huge difference as we with our ~3 times Spain's suffered. So you couldn't explain. However, you might have something there, Steve. Population density had a lot to do with initial spread. Funny you've bought up population density now that you have been defeated on non pharmaceutical interventions, which were well meaning but pointless and harmful.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Nov 12, 2022 19:08:01 GMT
Well for a start the epidemic started earlier in Spain (and Italy). We had the chance to see what was happening there and act. Spain has a density of 94 per km 2 Sweden less than a third of that just 25 2 and population density makes a huge difference as we with our ~3 times Spain's suffered. So you couldn't explain. However, you might have something there, Steve. Population density had a lot to do with initial spread. Funny you've bought up population density now that you have been defeated on non pharmaceutical interventions, which were well meaning but pointless and harmful. Do stop talking bollocks about my posts. You want to live your life with your head up your arse about why lockdowns were needed be my guest but it isn't a good look
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2022 20:42:32 GMT
So you couldn't explain. However, you might have something there, Steve. Population density had a lot to do with initial spread. Funny you've bought up population density now that you have been defeated on non pharmaceutical interventions, which were well meaning but pointless and harmful. Do stop talking bollocks about my posts. You want to live your life with your head up your arse about why lockdowns were needed be my guest but it isn't a good look You lost your argument. It's not my problem if you try to support a position which is easily pole axed by a few figures from public domains. I don't care how it looks, if I think I am right I will post that opinion with links to back them up. I see you've stopped debating the actual issue and reverted to veiled personal attacks. Now THAT is not a good look.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Nov 12, 2022 21:14:44 GMT
No YOU say I lost my argument and given your other posts, frankly that means nothing other than you can't actually articulate a proper counter argument
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Nov 13, 2022 7:16:03 GMT
The facts are that Sweden had NO lockdowns at all and not only did they get the fewest "excess deaths" but they also did the least damage to their economy. The one thing that we have learned - or most of us anyway - is that lockdowns don't work. In fact the damage done to the economy has killed far more people than Covid ever would have done. Yes, as I said previously, we know all that now. But who would have been confident making those calls up front? (And, let's be honest, the government would still have been criticised if they'd gone the other way). And I don't believe that Sweden is a valid comparison. More people live inside the M25 than in the whole of Sweden and population density is a major factor. Yes I agree entirely. I think the govt did a reasonable job given that no one knew what they were dealing with. The main complaint I have is their use of Neil Ferguson's model. He's a well-known charlatan and doomster as his failures have shown: [Imperial College epidemiologist Neil] Ferguson was behind the disputed research that sparked the mass culling of eleven million sheep and cattle during the 2001 outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. He also predicted that up to 150,000 people could die. There were fewer than 200 deaths.
In 2002, Ferguson predicted that up to 50,000 people would likely die from exposure to BSE (mad cow disease) in beef. In the U.K., there were only 177 deaths from BSE.
In 2005, Ferguson predicted that up to 150 million people could be killed from bird flu. In the end, only 282 people died worldwide from the disease between 2003 and 2009.
In 2009, a government estimate, based on Ferguson’s advice, said a “reasonable worst-case scenario” was that the swine flu would lead to 65,000 British deaths. In the end, swine flu killed 457 people in the U.K.
Last March, Ferguson admitted that his Imperial College model of the COVID-19 disease was based on undocumented, 13-year-old computer code that was intended to be used for a feared influenza pandemic, rather than a coronavirus.
Sweden isn't a direct comparison with the UK for lots of reasons (which all work against the UK) but I wasn't directly comparing the two countries. I was just pointing out that Sweden did better (from the point of view of excess deaths) than most of Europe.
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Nov 13, 2022 7:29:08 GMT
Yes, as I said previously, we know all that now. But who would have been confident making those calls up front? (And, let's be honest, the government would still have been criticised if they'd gone the other way). And I don't believe that Sweden is a valid comparison. More people live inside the M25 than in the whole of Sweden and population density is a major factor. Yes I agree entirely. I think the govt did a reasonable job given that no one knew what they were dealing with. The main complaint I have is their use of Neil Ferguson's model. He's a well-known charlatan and doomster as his failures have shown: [Imperial College epidemiologist Neil] Ferguson was behind the disputed research that sparked the mass culling of eleven million sheep and cattle during the 2001 outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. He also predicted that up to 150,000 people could die. There were fewer than 200 deaths.
In 2002, Ferguson predicted that up to 50,000 people would likely die from exposure to BSE (mad cow disease) in beef. In the U.K., there were only 177 deaths from BSE.
In 2005, Ferguson predicted that up to 150 million people could be killed from bird flu. In the end, only 282 people died worldwide from the disease between 2003 and 2009.
In 2009, a government estimate, based on Ferguson’s advice, said a “reasonable worst-case scenario” was that the swine flu would lead to 65,000 British deaths. In the end, swine flu killed 457 people in the U.K.
Last March, Ferguson admitted that his Imperial College model of the COVID-19 disease was based on undocumented, 13-year-old computer code that was intended to be used for a feared influenza pandemic, rather than a coronavirus.
Sweden isn't a direct comparison with the UK for lots of reasons (which all work against the UK) but I wasn't directly comparing the two countries. I was just pointing out that Sweden did better (from the point of view of excess deaths) than most of Europe. I hadn't realised it was Feruson's idea but that may explain why DEFRA shied away from making public statements. I wrote to DEFRA about both a general issue and a particular case. Unfortunately I did that within a single letter to which DEFRA replied that they didn't discuss specific cases, It was only later that I discovered matters were far worse than I expected, particularly as DEFRA, typical of a government body, followed policy religiously.
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Nov 13, 2022 7:38:23 GMT
Are you Neil Ferguson by any chance? That's exactly the kind of prediction that he would make. Put two points on a graph and then draw a straight line between them and extrapolate to infinity - and very soon we're all dead. Fortunately it doesn't work like that. Modelling viral infections is more complex than that. The facts are that Sweden had NO lockdowns at all and not only did they get the fewest "excess deaths" but they also did the least damage to their economy. The one thing that we have learned - or most of us anyway - is that lockdowns don't work. In fact the damage done to the economy has killed far more people than Covid ever would have done. No I'm not Ferguson, I'm just someone who didn't give up on maths in primary school. You however . . . And you're also wrong on Sweden on just about every point. feel free to show us your analysis you imagine shows ' the damage done to the economy has killed far more people than Covid ever would have done.'You seem to have a "primary school understanding" of what maths is. The predictions of the models that SAGE used are science not maths. There's a big difference. And I've just said that Sweden has about the lowest excess deaths in Europe - which seems to indicate that not locking down was a good strategy. But I acknowledge that it's a tricky calculation. Locking down can "buy time" in that it does slow down the rate of transmission. But lockdowns have bad effects on the general health of the population (because of the lack of care for other illnesses). These are only found out later - and we're beginning to realise these effects with excess deaths. I don't think govts will be quite so quick to lockdown in future.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 13, 2022 9:13:30 GMT
Well done - and now try reading it. "NERVTAG does not advise port of entry screening, irrespective of the current limited understanding of the epidemiology." "There are no practical preventative actions that HMG might undertake ahead of Chinese New Year"LOL. Sage's first debate on covid took place on 22nd Jan 2020. --- Chinese New Year 25 Jan. 2020.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Nov 13, 2022 9:52:41 GMT
Well has going to perserving life yea wernt we the first country to vacctionate people fat lot of good that did. just wondered how our vaccination didnt prevent has many deaths as the EU what did they do what we didnt They counted them differently - that is why you cannot measure the amount of covid deaths between different countries. The only halfway accurate measure is excess deaths - and even then its not that accurate. The biggest laugh was the UK measurement which included deaths FOR ANY REASON within 28 days of a positive test which meant they actually included a drunk who walked up the M4 motorway off his face at 3am and got creamed by an HGV in those dying of COVID because he’d tested positive the week before. Let’s get something straight. I’ve had this bloody pox THREE times now. Once long before we knew it was leaving Chinese dead in the streets, when several Chinese “businessmen” and their secret service escorts gave it to one of our company drivers and it manifested as the worst bout of flu ever, once when a bloody illegal immigrant brought it to the immigration hearing and infected all the bloody staff including my wife, killing two, maiming three and bloody nearly killing me, and once last month when a nasty sniffle gave a positive LFT. So is this disease a killer ? Yes, to some unfortunate buggers it is. It’s taken two people my wife knew. Two people with no particularly serious health issues who were culled through being old. It’s buggered the health of a bloke I know who is now an injecting diabetic and it’s given me heart failure with only 30% ejected volume which should be over 50%. Yesterday I tried to take a Dutch Hoe and scrape the weeds off our patio and driveway. I had to stop after each 18 inches of patio slab and sit down because I couldn’t breathe properly THATS what this pox has done to me. BUT was shitloads of money wasted or thrown at pals who make Arfur Daley look an honest man ? Bloody right it was.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Nov 13, 2022 11:09:03 GMT
No I'm not Ferguson, I'm just someone who didn't give up on maths in primary school. You however . . . And you're also wrong on Sweden on just about every point. feel free to show us your analysis you imagine shows ' the damage done to the economy has killed far more people than Covid ever would have done.'You seem to have a "primary school understanding" of what maths is. The predictions of the models that SAGE used are science not maths. There's a big difference. And I've just said that Sweden has about the lowest excess deaths in Europe - which seems to indicate that not locking down was a good strategy. But I acknowledge that it's a tricky calculation. Locking down can "buy time" in that it does slow down the rate of transmission. But lockdowns have bad effects on the general health of the population (because of the lack of care for other illnesses). These are only found out later - and we're beginning to realise these effects with excess deaths. I don't think govts will be quite so quick to lockdown in future. Well feel free to show us your maths but while you're trying to understand that get someone of mental age over 5 to explain 'It was never about the deaths' to you. I've tried but seems I used a multisyllable word which may have confused you.
|
|