|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jan 4, 2024 17:25:04 GMT
.haha talk hypocrisy I've Already pointed out you're hypocrisy and you keep crying Labour are hypocritical lol I Ask you again if you think some schools that earn high MILIONS shouldn't pay a penny in Tax. You avoid answer last time . A simple yes or no will do. If you don't answer you don't really have a point on this subject. The schools do pay tax - always have done always will. VAT though is a tax on the purchaser not the supplier. Labour want to make it unaffordable for the average person to afford a private education of the standard that Starmer enjoyed and benefited from. Pulling up the drawbridge is what Labour have always done.
Hypocrites. Still, if the terminally dim keep falling for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 4, 2024 17:36:35 GMT
Ha window dressing from Steamer a Blair clone who talks one thing and does another. Silly unproven comments like yours just expose your superficial level of thinking and knowledge, and a mentality controlled by total bias. Pretty sad really. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 4, 2024 17:45:49 GMT
The schools do pay tax - always have done always will. VAT though is a tax on the purchaser not the supplier. Labour want to make it unaffordable for the average person to afford a private education of the standard that Starmer enjoyed and benefited from. Pulling up the drawbridge is what Labour have always done.
Hypocrites. Still, if the terminally dim keep falling for it.
Oh your including vat know are we talk about twisting things. You know very well I said about Earnings. Make it uncomfortable for the Average child to go to a Private school Now I know your having a laugh What average family can afford £74.000 A year that nearly triple a average family earn a year. If one is working. And you moan about what Governments Spend on public Services. Hypocrite ha ha |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jan 4, 2024 17:47:59 GMT
What are you dribbling on about now?
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 4, 2024 17:48:30 GMT
The schools do pay tax - always have done always will. VAT though is a tax on the purchaser not the supplier. Labour want to make it unaffordable for the average person to afford a private education of the standard that Starmer enjoyed and benefited from. Pulling up the drawbridge is what Labour have always done.
Hypocrites. Still, if the terminally dim keep falling for it.
Haha its Some of the terminally dim that pay your wages pal. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jan 4, 2024 18:12:59 GMT
Pulling up the drawbridge is what Labour have always done.
Hypocrites. Still, if the terminally dim keep falling for it.
Haha its Some of the terminally dim that pay your wages pal. And the price of fish? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 4, 2024 19:44:09 GMT
The schools do pay tax - always have done always will. VAT though is a tax on the purchaser not the supplier. Labour want to make it unaffordable for the average person to afford a private education of the standard that Starmer enjoyed and benefited from. Pulling up the drawbridge is what Labour have always done.
Hypocrites. Still, if the terminally dim keep falling for it.
Labour introduced comprehensive education for the benefit of everyone. But the boys will never do better than the girls of the same age because females during the academic years are more developed than males. Girls have a straight line of development boys have two hiccups in their development. One takes place in the womb when the 'Y' chromosome kicks in. A second takes place around the age of four when the male muscle system becomes masculine. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Jan 4, 2024 19:51:05 GMT
The level is unimportant as an instrument available to government to seek out facts and the truth and make amends and 'learn lessons', the trust in them as an effective means to achieve those ends has been lost. So you would like to wipe out all the evidence, facts and judgements just because you disagree with one or two. That's not very bright of you. No they have come into disrepute because all too often the evidence is not there, conclusions are reached that seemed to have been preset and direction of those conclusions is part of the 'investigative' procedures. If government initiates an enquiry or a report 9 times out of ten it will be directed to a predetermined conclusion. The pathway is clear from Macpherson, through the social housing for migrants report to the Inquiry as regards the grooming gangs and associated reports. If you trawl through Macpherson then the evidence on which he reaches his conclusion of 'Institutional racism' is at best flimsy and at worst non-existent, the social housing to migrants report was statistical nonsense as confirmed by senior stats Professor and the grooming gang Inquiry and reports dodge wherever possible and in any way they can ethnicity and always use most child abusers are white which totally dodges the ethnic make up of most of the gangs in all the high profile cases which even on the basic 'look' test is obvious and is clearer as names are disclosed. Once government go down the route of using Inquiries to counter potential social and political problesm instead of solving them then they will always be regarded as suspect. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 4, 2024 19:58:25 GMT
So you would like to wipe out all the evidence, facts and judgements just because you disagree with one or two. That's not very bright of you. No they have come into disrepute because all too often the evidence is not there, conclusions are reached that seemed to have been preset and direction of those conclusions is part of the 'investigative' procedures. If government initiates an enquiry or a report 9 times out of ten it will be directed to a predetermined conclusion. The pathway is clear from Macpherson, through the social housing for migrants report to the Inquiry as regards the grooming gangs and associated reports. If you trawl through Macpherson then the evidence on which he reaches his conclusion of 'Institutional racism' is at best flimsy and at worst non-existent, the social housing to migrants report was statistical nonsense as confirmed by senior stats Professor and the grooming gang Inquiry and reports dodge wherever possible and in any way they can ethnicity and always use most child abusers are white which totally dodges the ethnic make up of most of the gangs in all the high profile cases which even on the basic 'look' test is obvious and is clearer as names are disclosed. Once government go down the route of using Inquiries to counter potential social and political problesm instead of solving them then they will always be regarded as suspect. Name a couple of them where the evidence is not there. Personally I think you are posting absolute rubbish. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 4, 2024 20:00:40 GMT
Pulling up the drawbridge is what Labour have always done.
Hypocrites. Still, if the terminally dim keep falling for it.
Haha its Some of the terminally dim that pay your wages pal. Personally I would sack him for telling lies. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Jan 4, 2024 20:02:40 GMT
Ha window dressing from Steamer a Blair clone who talks one thing and does another. Silly unproven comments like yours just expose your superficial level of thinking and knowledge, and a mentality controlled by total bias. Pretty sad really. Read that back to yourself when you post your adoration of Blair. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 4, 2024 20:17:35 GMT
.haha talk hypocrisy I've Already pointed out you're hypocrisy and you keep crying Labour are hypocritical lol I Ask you again if you think some schools that earn high MILIONS shouldn't pay a penny in Tax. You avoid answer last time . A simple yes or no will do. If you don't answer you don't really have a point on this subject. The schools do pay tax - always have done always will. VAT though is a tax on the purchaser not the supplier. Labour want to make it unaffordable for the average person to afford a private education of the standard that Starmer enjoyed and benefited from. Oh my it gets worse Charities pay VAT on all standard-rated goods and services they buy from VAT-registered businesses. They pay VAT at a reduced rate (5%) or the 'zero rate' on some goods and services. www.gov.uk › vat-charities What the common rate of Vat these days 20%? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 4, 2024 20:19:08 GMT
Silly unproven comments like yours just expose your superficial level of thinking and knowledge, and a mentality controlled by total bias. Pretty sad really. Read that back to yourself when you post your adoration of Blair. Telling lies, about me this time, is so typical of Righties, they are definitely less than a full shilling, otherwise they wouldn't be out on the wing of politics. Lying and denigration is in their DNA, that's what I call sad. You do not have to prove your immaturity to me, but I do enjoy a nice chuckle when you do it  |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Jan 4, 2024 20:24:48 GMT
No they have come into disrepute because all too often the evidence is not there, conclusions are reached that seemed to have been preset and direction of those conclusions is part of the 'investigative' procedures. If government initiates an enquiry or a report 9 times out of ten it will be directed to a predetermined conclusion. The pathway is clear from Macpherson, through the social housing for migrants report to the Inquiry as regards the grooming gangs and associated reports. If you trawl through Macpherson then the evidence on which he reaches his conclusion of 'Institutional racism' is at best flimsy and at worst non-existent, the social housing to migrants report was statistical nonsense as confirmed by senior stats Professor and the grooming gang Inquiry and reports dodge wherever possible and in any way they can ethnicity and always use most child abusers are white which totally dodges the ethnic make up of most of the gangs in all the high profile cases which even on the basic 'look' test is obvious and is clearer as names are disclosed. Once government go down the route of using Inquiries to counter potential social and political problesm instead of solving them then they will always be regarded as suspect. Name a couple of them where the evidence is not their. Personally I think you are posting absolute rubbish. I have given three above. Inquiries and government reports. Perhaps just pointing to a shred of evidence to reach a conclusion of Institutional racism in the Met in Macpherson would be easy for you. I cannot find it, and I have tried. So Macpherson is one. The report on the allocation of social housing to migrants by the EHRC in circa 2009 is another report flawed in its procedures and distinct in its findings for which no real evidence was presented. Rubbished as nonsense by senior statisticians and even noticeable in its statistical misuse to relative laymen like myself. One Inquiry, one government commissioned report both disingenuous in their findings. All else of disbelief flows from those in my view. So an 'Inquiry' as a tragedy of modern Britain means nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Jan 4, 2024 20:46:21 GMT
Read that back to yourself when you post your adoration of Blair. Telling lies, about me this time, is so typical of Righties, they are definitely less than a full shilling, otherwise they wouldn't be out on the wing of politics. Lying and denigration is in their DNA, that's what I call sad. You do not have to prove your immaturity to me, but I do enjoy a nice chuckle when you do it Ah I see so when you post that about another its from a person of great intellect the height of integrity but if you are described similarly it’s all lies from a thicko. I suspect it’s a lack of self awareness on your part along with the delusion of your own worth that few others would share. |
|
