How to get rich from conspiracy theories

So were the U.S. construction companies sued for negligence and murder by NIST … over the work they did on the Twin Towers and WTC 7?

… surely a comprehensive enquiry with your findings can make such a case in litigious America today? … The relatives of the dead of the Twin Towers deserve compensation from the $$$$$$billions Larry Silverstein made from his insurance claims running buildings that according to Vinny’s evidence MUST have been poorly constructed and atrociously maintained! 🤔

…. ☠️💩☠️ Death traps in reality.

I wish my “comedy skills” were equally recognised and remunerated … my last Sanctions-hiked gas/lekky bill was astronomical! 🙄😖

You don’t have clue what you are looking at! I have explained it all to you before. Obviously you just prefer conspiracy theories to natural law and the laws of physics. You have been lied to and are let down even more by your own ignorance of natural law, engineering principals and physics!


What you see in that video and others, is called vortex shedding and the ‘smoke’ is not ‘smoke’, it is the remains of 2 x 110 stories high buildings collapsing and the 100 to 150mm thick light concrete floors, now powdered, from the collapse of WTC1 & 2, with a small amount of smoke entrained and being swept up in the vortices at both the south corners of the building. Just like a big Dyson vacuum cleaner! This powder, which is btw fireproof and an excellent insulator, snuffed out any fires and any actual smoke is from furniture and fittings smoldering due to lack of oxygen. Most of your ‘smoke’ is just dust! It covered everything and everyone that was caught in it right across Manhattan !


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_shedding or


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A1rm%C3%A1n_vortex_street

According to NIST there was no serious structural damage and this single ‘gash’ in the south face you keep referring to as ‘serious’ structural damage, was of no significance because The Atrium was NOT a part of the load bearing part of the structure. The whole 21 central core column structure was intact and undamaged.


www.nist.gov/pao/questions-and-answers-about-nist-wtc-7-investigation


NIST’s Shyum Sunders 14 second excuse “....... a wholly new phenomena, never seen before” ...... or since and that they have never been able to prove except by removing critical bits of steelwork from their WTC7 collapse model and even then they never got it work!


www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc ...... @38 secs


The explanation given by a proper civil engineer, referencing the Hulsey report. A bit longer to watch ..... but giving the full story always takes time. Maybe a bit too technical for you though.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZgZUtdkROU


There were no raging fires and those that were burning were isolated and of ‘normal office fire’ level which the building was designed to withstand !  The only fires visible, and even they had almost burnt out, were on the East side at levels 9,11 and 12 as you show in some videos. But the flames are mostly outside the building and can be seen igniting when the hot inflammable gases reach fresh air, through the broken window. That is why there a very few internal fires ……. lack of oxygen.


There are NO flames at all visible in that picture ……. or any other picture because there were no significant fires. Your previous explanation that this was because the windows were all ‘sooted-up’ was laughable rubbish. If these invisible ‘raging fires’ were hot enough to soften steel across the whole structure …….. they would shatter the windows.


It is reported that 70% of US residents are still unaware of WTC7’s collapse. What you believe about WTC7, and the Twin Towers ……… now puts you in the minority!

But WTC7 wasn't struck by any aircraft ...... and yet it fell in a very similar way to WTC1 and WTC2, on the same day!

For the first and only time in history a 47 story steel framed building with a foot print the size of a US football field, collapsed in an 'emulation' of a controlled demolition ...... partly at free fall acceleration ....... into its own footprint ....... due to an ordinary office fire?

You find nothing strange in that scenario?

I keep telling you ..... I don't need to lie because I understand the Universal Laws of Physic, natural law and can actually apply them and I have an engineering background since my early 20's.    In most cases I can sort the wheat from the chaff ..... you only ever consider the chaff. 
  

Vinny (and Handyman) I admire your perseverance using referenced facts to combat the forces of  and 

But you'll never shut them up, seems they don't make the straps at the asylum chew proof any more

 ^