|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 9, 2023 20:21:06 GMT
Becasue there is irrefutable evidence that the disappearance of the English people from their historic homeland as a majority is a fact not too far distant from being realised. This may be down to all sorts of other factors but it is still obvious that immigration levels are significantly against their wishes and the notion is fairly widespread from ethnic minorities is 'how does it feel'? I could add whitey there if you like. Also the laws are made that mandates diversity and inclusion as diversity is being systematically increased. Another law that bases its existence on 'fairness' and 'equality' whilst doing exactly the opposite. LOL! There's 'irrefutable evidence' that 'the English people' will not be a majority at some point in the future, and you've concluded from this that some powerful group of people has decided to wipe out the 'ethnic English'!!! That's one hell of a leap! Immigrants are welcomed for economic and humanitarian reasons. There is zero evidence of anything else. There are some crackpot theories, but, as is to be expected, there is zero evidence. Keep on doing it you fool no one with your general ignoring of many points and your attempts to ridicule, it is now rather transparent as I clearly qualified what I said in the latter part of the post. Since this is the Mind Zone I will only observe that you are becoming a bit of a caricature. It is not surprising you support the EU and the climate crisis. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 9, 2023 20:23:29 GMT
Wrong , you became indignant. I merely asked a question , I never claimed that it was or wasn’t happening. You seem to be incapable of understanding a quite simple premise and consequently inventing ones to attribute to me . LOL! Last night you claimed there was no genocide. Now, you appear to be claiming the reverse. So, were you lying last night, or are you lying now? Wrong again darling. I said that I never claimed that genocide was being committed.lol. Do you have trouble comprehending what other people say often ? |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 9, 2023 20:24:41 GMT
LOL! There's 'irrefutable evidence' that 'the English people' will not be a majority at some point in the future, and you've concluded from this that some powerful group of people has decided to wipe out the 'ethnic English'!!! That's one hell of a leap! Immigrants are welcomed for economic and humanitarian reasons. There is zero evidence of anything else. There are some crackpot theories, but, as is to be expected, there is zero evidence. Keep on doing it you fool no one with your general ignoring of many points and your attempts to ridicule, it is now rather transparent as I clearly qualified what I said in the latter part of the post. Since this is the Mind Zone I will only observe that you are becoming a bit of a caricature. It is not surprising you support the EU and the climate crisis. If you have any evidence to support your crackpot theory, put it before us. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 9, 2023 20:25:55 GMT
LOL! Last night you claimed there was no genocide. Now, you appear to be claiming the reverse. So, were you lying last night, or are you lying now? Wrong again darling. I said that I never claimed that genocide was being committed.lol. Do you have trouble comprehending what other people say ? From the very beginning, I’ve maintained that none of you actually believe that genocide is happening, that you use the word genocide because you feel that word has more emotional appeal than the word/s that actually describe what is happening. In your case, it’s especially apparent that you don’t believe that genocide is happening. Why? Because you haven’t been able to keep your story straight. Last night, you claimed that you thought no such thing. Today, it’s quite the opposite. Let’s have another look at what you said last night (note that it contradicts what you are claiming now): ‘So we both agree that I never claimed that genocide was being committed . So why have you repeatedly accused me of claiming this when I have done nothing of the kind ? Did you do this maliciously or was you incapable of following a simple premise ?’ |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 9, 2023 20:28:56 GMT
Of course they were, Cambodia was political, cultural revolution was political. And realistically we do not know the specific identity of those who are pushing the situation they may have co-opted many English people to help unwittingly. That's a very strange definition of genocide. By that definition, all civil war is genocide. It is called the Cambodian genocide (officially) as it affected mostly groups opposed to the Khmer rouge both as ethnic groups and as the intelligentsia of the group(s) conducting the acts. The cultural revolution is referred to as cultural genocide. These are not my definitions, they are in common usage. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Dec 9, 2023 20:29:07 GMT
So, your answer is b, then. The 'ethnic English' are the subjects of genocide, but only if the word genocide is given an unusual meaning. Thanks for the clarification ... at last! Unusual? Wrong ! You just make that up. Is defining a biological male as a woman attributing an unusual meaning darling ? Its gone off the irony meter. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 9, 2023 20:30:08 GMT
Keep on doing it you fool no one with your general ignoring of many points and your attempts to ridicule, it is now rather transparent as I clearly qualified what I said in the latter part of the post. Since this is the Mind Zone I will only observe that you are becoming a bit of a caricature. It is not surprising you support the EU and the climate crisis. If you have any evidence to support your crackpot theory, put it before us. Done it you have ignored it, your choice and everyone else's observance. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 9, 2023 20:31:15 GMT
Wrong again darling. I said that I never claimed that genocide was being committed.lol. Do you have trouble comprehending what other people say ? From the very beginning, I’ve maintained that none of you actually believe that genocide is happening, that you use the word genocide because you feel that word has more emotional appeal than the word/s that actually describe what is happening. In your case, it’s especially apparent that you don’t believe that genocide is happening. Why? Because you haven’t been able to keep your story straight. Last night, you claimed that you thought no such thing. Today, it’s quite the opposite. Let’s have another look at what you said last night (note that it contradicts what you are claiming now): ‘So we both agree that I never claimed that genocide was being committed . So why have you repeatedly accused me of claiming this when I have done nothing of the kind ? Did you do this maliciously or was you incapable of following a simple premise ?’ My ‘ story’ is perfectly straight. I just don’t think that you are intelligent enough to comprehend it. one thing that confirms my belief is that you can’t tell the difference between ‘ I never claimed that genocide was being committed ‘ and claiming ‘genocide was not committed ‘. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 9, 2023 20:31:52 GMT
Unusual? Wrong ! You just make that up. Is defining a biological male as a woman attributing an unusual meaning darling ? It’s gone off the irony meter. And the projection meter. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 9, 2023 20:34:50 GMT
From the very beginning, I’ve maintained that none of you actually believe that genocide is happening, that you use the word genocide because you feel that word has more emotional appeal than the word/s that actually describe what is happening. In your case, it’s especially apparent that you don’t believe that genocide is happening. Why? Because you haven’t been able to keep your story straight. Last night, you claimed that you thought no such thing. Today, it’s quite the opposite. Let’s have another look at what you said last night (note that it contradicts what you are claiming now): ‘So we both agree that I never claimed that genocide was being committed . So why have you repeatedly accused me of claiming this when I have done nothing of the kind ? Did you do this maliciously or was you incapable of following a simple premise ?’ My ‘ story’ is perfectly straight. I just don’t think that you are intelligent enough to comprehend it. one thing that confirms my belief is that you can’t tell the difference between ‘ I never claimed that genocide was being committed ‘ and claiming ‘genocide was not committed ‘. You were caught in a direct contradiction. You don't believe genocide is happening. You couldn't have been clearer about that. So, everything you're saying about genocide now is pure fabrication. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 9, 2023 20:36:28 GMT
If you have any evidence to support your crackpot theory, put it before us. Done it you have ignored it, your choice and everyone else's observance. You have presented a crackpot conspiracy theory. Nothing more. You haven't produced a scintilla of evidence in support, unless Kafkaesque inference counts as evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 9, 2023 20:40:18 GMT
My ‘ story’ is perfectly straight. I just don’t think that you are intelligent enough to comprehend it. one thing that confirms my belief is that you can’t tell the difference between ‘ I never claimed that genocide was being committed ‘ and claiming ‘genocide was not committed ‘. You were caught in a direct contradiction. You don't believe genocide is happening. You couldn't have been clearer about that. So, everything you're saying about genocide now is pure fabrication. I never said I don’t believe genocide is happening. I said I never claimed that genocide is happening . As I pointed out in the post you replied to ..you don’t seem bright enough to tell the difference. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 9, 2023 20:43:18 GMT
You were caught in a direct contradiction. You don't believe genocide is happening. You couldn't have been clearer about that. So, everything you're saying about genocide now is pure fabrication. I never said I don’t believe genocide is happening. I said I never claimed that genocide is happening . As I pointed out in the post you replied to ..you don’t seem bright enough to tell the difference. Hold on! let's look at what you said again. Pay particular attention to the part in bold: ‘So we both agree that I never claimed that genocide was being committed . So why have you repeatedly accused me of claiming this when I have done nothing of the kind ? Did you do this maliciously or was you incapable of following a simple premise ?’
If you actually believe that genocide is being committed, why would it be malicious to say that's what you believe? This never works out for you or Bubbles. Nobody ever believes you when you claim to have said something that you plainly did say. We both know, everyone knows, your above post was an attempt to refute the idea that you believe genocide is occurring. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 9, 2023 20:46:02 GMT
Done it you have ignored it, your choice and everyone else's observance. You have presented a crackpot conspiracy theory. Nothing more. You haven't produced a scintilla of evidence in support, unless Kafkaesque inference counts as evidence. There are about 50 guests at the moment some may be following this thread and observing your antics, by all means you can keep it up if you wish. The evidence is contained in my post about three hours ago which you in totally ignored, by all means refute those points with reasoned debate but you seem to be stuck in 'crackpot theory' mode which I sure does not address any of the points. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 9, 2023 20:47:20 GMT
You have presented a crackpot conspiracy theory. Nothing more. You haven't produced a scintilla of evidence in support, unless Kafkaesque inference counts as evidence. There are about 50 guests at the moment some may be following this thread and observing your antics, by all means you can keep it up if you wish. The evidence is contained in my post about three hours ago which you in totally ignored, by all means refute those points with reasoned debate but you seem to be stuck in 'crackpot theory' mode which I sure does not address any of the points. This is the Mind Zone. I'm entitled to ask for evidence in support an argument, particularly when it's as outrageous as the claim that genocide is being committed in the UK. And the 'guests' are bots. They won't mind. |
|
