|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 8, 2023 18:48:19 GMT
I think some people have got together and decided that it would be better if there was no white race . In fact I think the same conversations go on in college bars quite frequently. Someone you trust is one of us. It’s no about you . |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 8, 2023 18:48:46 GMT
It only takes more than one and I have not said 'the white race' I have said 'the English'. If two people think it would be a good wheeze to denigrate English culture it is a conspiracy, not a theory. Why they would do that is more difficult to ascertain but showing it is happening is not a problem, showing it is not happening should be easy if it is only a 'theory'. The cultural genocide, ethnocide or genocide is unavoidable. All they can do is deny reality. Different cultures and ethnicities will merge. That's not genocide. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2023 18:50:39 GMT
There was no mandate from the people to have their cultures and ethnicity wiped out in an act of genocide.
|
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Dec 8, 2023 18:50:39 GMT
The cultural genocide, ethnocide or genocide is unavoidable. All they can do is deny reality. Different cultures and ethnicities will merge. That's not genocide. Indeed, it's also deeply insulting to genuine victims of genocide. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Dec 8, 2023 18:51:11 GMT
There was no mandate from the people to have their cultures and ethnicity wiped out in an act of genocide. Where is the proof of this genocide? |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 8, 2023 18:51:22 GMT
Which is the point he is not English he is British, that is his defined Nationality, legally. Entwining himself into an English identity usurps those who have an English identity. Wanting to be English is not the same as actually being English and English, as we have seen, is defined as the English people, howsoever that is defined mostly by the English. We allow Native Americans to define themselves and who is and is not Native American, we allow Aborigines to define themselves and we allow ethnic groups all over the world to define themselves, the English alone seem to be the sole people who are denied that right. The English were in India for three hundred years, sometimes about a dozen generations were born and bred in India, to the Indians they were still the English and to the English they were still the English. A land of birth does not change ethnicity unless you integrate as a step to allowing assimilation. Again you're conflating ethnicity with nationality which are two different things. There is more to a nation and it's people than ethnicity. Do you deny the existence of English culture, customs, values? Are you saying that Winston Churchill and Boris Johnson are not English? In reality it is you who is conflating the two. British is the legal Nationality. English is an ethnic group from which the culture and traditions have arisen. Boris Johnstone is British, Churchill was also British as he was a subject of the Crown of the UK. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 8, 2023 18:51:28 GMT
Funny, they should feature on so many university courses, then. Your post wasn't entirely serious, though. Lots of things appear on university courses that shouldn't. Hadn't you been aware? I There's nothing to stop you starting thread in support of platonic forms. I'll be happy to engage. If you think you have come up with a refutation of Wittgenstein's thesis, I'd be very interested to hear it. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 8, 2023 18:51:57 GMT
You are like a religious cult member who has studied their own religious dogma for years and keeps telling everyone that THEY don’t understand every time the dogma is has found to be nonsense . We can call up down and down up according to your premise . Dave with a dick isn’t a woman darling . He is a biological man and refutes your idiocy of a totally subjective language thus. I don't think you understand, based on your responses. For instance, nobody has suggested a totally subjective language. A totally subjective language is impossible. If a biological male can be defined as a female , it points to a totally or near totally subjective language that defines it . You don’t even understand your own premise darling . |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 8, 2023 18:52:10 GMT
There was no mandate from the people to have their cultures and ethnicity wiped out in an act of genocide. What genocide? Who dies if a black woman and a white man have a child together? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2023 18:53:16 GMT
Just because you can't mass-murder people doesn't rule out the crime against humanity. A point you're unwilling to accept, because you support the process that leads to the genocide of English culture and the ethnic group.
|
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 8, 2023 18:53:22 GMT
I don't think you understand, based on your responses. For instance, nobody has suggested a totally subjective language. A totally subjective language is impossible. If a biological male can be defined as a female , it points to a totally or near totally subjective language that defines it . You don’t even understand your own premise darling . No, it doesn't. That's simply wrong. What is a biological male is decided by society. There is no platonic 'biological male'. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Dec 8, 2023 18:53:52 GMT
Again you're conflating ethnicity with nationality which are two different things. There is more to a nation and it's people than ethnicity. Do you deny the existence of English culture, customs, values? Are you saying that Winston Churchill and Boris Johnson are not English? In reality it is you who is conflating the two. British is the legal Nationality. English is an ethnic group from which the culture and traditions have arisen. Boris Johnstone is British, Churchill was also British as he was a subject of the Crown of the UK. English ethnicity and English nationality both exist. I'm British but I'm not Welsh or Scottish, I'm English. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 8, 2023 18:54:05 GMT
Just because you can't mass-murder people doesn't rule out the crime against humanity. A point you're unwilling to accept, because you support the process that leads to the genocide of English culture and the ethnic group. Who dies if a white woman and a black man have a child together? Genocide involves killing. Who is killed? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 8, 2023 18:54:35 GMT
Lots of things appear on university courses that shouldn't. Hadn't you been aware? I There's nothing to stop you starting thread in support of platonic forms. I'll be happy to engage. If you think you have come up with a refutation of Wittgenstein's thesis, I'd be very interested to hear it. If his thesis claims that Dave the scaffolder with a penis and testicles can be defined as a female them it refuted itself darling . You dont seem to understand this. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2023 18:55:00 GMT
It's just going around in circles on here.
GENOCIDE != MURDER.
GENOCIDE == the intentional act of wiping out a culture and a people in part or whole.
|
|
