|
|
Post by happyhornet on Dec 8, 2023 18:55:39 GMT
It's just going around in circles on here. GENOCIDE != MURDER. GENOCIDE == the intentional act of wiping out a culture and a people. Where is the proof? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 8, 2023 18:56:04 GMT
If a biological male can be defined as a female , it points to a totally or near totally subjective language that defines it . You don’t even understand your own premise darling . No, it doesn't. That's simply wrong. What is a biological male is decided by society. There is no platonic 'biological male'. Yes it does , you are simply wrong . A biological male is defined by specific attributes . |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Dec 8, 2023 18:56:25 GMT
Again you're conflating ethnicity with nationality which are two different things. There is more to a nation and it's people than ethnicity. Do you deny the existence of English culture, customs, values? Are you saying that Winston Churchill and Boris Johnson are not English? In reality it is you who is conflating the two. British is the legal Nationality. English is an ethnic group from which the culture and traditions have arisen. Boris Johnstone is British, Churchill was also British as he was a subject of the Crown of the UK. Here you appear to be denying the existence of the English nation. Genocide? |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 8, 2023 19:00:03 GMT
I There's nothing to stop you starting thread in support of platonic forms. I'll be happy to engage. If you think you have come up with a refutation of Wittgenstein's thesis, I'd be very interested to hear it. If his thesis claims that Dave the scaffolder with a penis and testicles can be defined as a female them it refuted itself darling . You dont seem to understand this. In some societies, Dave the scaffolder will have become an adult at 13. In others, he will have become an adult at 18. Weird, isn't it? How can he be a man in one society but not in another? According to you, one society has to be correct. The truth is that neither society is correct. Adulthood is a social construct. Everything depends on the defining criterion in the society in question. It's the same with sex or gender or whatever. Everything will depend on society's defining criterion. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2023 19:01:04 GMT
Multiculturalism, mass-immigration and the erasure of England as a democratic nation has all led to the intentional destruction of a culture and a people. There has never been no mandate for any of the destructive actions that was forced onto England, because genocide isn't something that can be mandated.
|
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 8, 2023 19:01:47 GMT
It's just going around in circles on here. GENOCIDE != MURDER. GENOCIDE == the intentional act of wiping out a culture and a people in part or whole. So, a white man who has a child with a black woman is committing genocide? Is that what you're asking us to believe? |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 8, 2023 19:02:02 GMT
As above. Who knows, who cares but the result is plain to see and if your house is burgled you do not need to catch the crooks to know it has happened. What result? Where is your evidence? As we see here and where Lammy declares he is English, where history revision is around every corner, where the English are subject against their specific will to large scale immigration, where laws exist that actively discriminate against the English, where social housing supplied largely by the English is allocated to immigrants who have 'greater need' resulting in the break up of close knit English communities, where English cities become at best Cosmopolitan and at worst controlled by the non English, where government is lauded and applauded for the declining numbers of Englishmen within it, where special consideration and funding is given to the non English for advancement within English Society, where objections are condemned as racist, where English groups are outlawed, where associations of others is encouraged. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 8, 2023 19:02:39 GMT
No, it doesn't. That's simply wrong. What is a biological male is decided by society. There is no platonic 'biological male'. Yes it does , you are simply wrong . A biological male is defined by specific attributes . A biological male is defined by specific attributes. You're quite right. But those attributes vary from time to time and place to place. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Dec 8, 2023 19:04:30 GMT
Multiculturalism, mass-immigration and the erasure of England as a democratic nation has all led to the intentional destruction of a culture and a people. There has never been no mandate for any of the destructive actions that was forced onto England, because genocide isn't something that can be mandated. So no proof then. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Dec 8, 2023 19:04:42 GMT
If his thesis claims that Dave the scaffolder with a penis and testicles can be defined as a female them it refuted itself darling . You dont seem to understand this. In some societies, Dave the scaffolder will have become an adult at 13. In others, he will have become an adult at 18. Weird, isn't it? How can he be a man in one society but not in another? According to you, one society has to be correct. The truth is that neither society is correct. Adulthood is a social construct. Everything depends on the defining criterion in the society in question. It's the same with sex or gender or whatever. Everything will depend on society's defining criterion. This society sounds a little confused. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 8, 2023 19:04:47 GMT
If his thesis claims that Dave the scaffolder with a penis and testicles can be defined as a female them it refuted itself darling . You dont seem to understand this. In some societies, Dave the scaffolder will have become an adult at 13. In others, he will have become an adult at 18. Weird, isn't it? How can he be a man in one society but not in another? According to you, one society has to be correct. The truth is that neither society is correct. Adulthood is a social construct. Everything depends on the defining criterion in the society in question. It's the same with sex or gender or whatever. Everything will depend on society's defining criterion. We’re not in some societies darling . We are in this society . Stop posting bollocks . |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 8, 2023 19:05:35 GMT
In some societies, Dave the scaffolder will have become an adult at 13. In others, he will have become an adult at 18. Weird, isn't it? How can he be a man in one society but not in another? According to you, one society has to be correct. The truth is that neither society is correct. Adulthood is a social construct. Everything depends on the defining criterion in the society in question. It's the same with sex or gender or whatever. Everything will depend on society's defining criterion. We’re not in some societies darling . We are in this society . Stop posting bollocks . But they can vary from society to society. You do accept that, don't you? |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Dec 8, 2023 19:06:18 GMT
What result? Where is your evidence? As we see here and where Lammy declares he is English, where history revision is around every corner, where the English are subject against their specific will to large scale immigration, where laws exist that actively discriminate against the English, where social housing supplied largely by the English is allocated to immigrants who have 'greater need' resulting in the break up of close knit English communities, where English cities become at best Cosmopolitan and at worst controlled by the non English, where government is lauded and applauded for the declining numbers of Englishmen within it, where special consideration and funding is given to the non English for advancement within English Society, where objections are condemned as racist, where English groups are outlawed, where associations of others is encouraged. David Lammy being English is proof of genocide? I'm not saying this to sound condescending or score points, if you really believe please, for the sake of the people who love you get help, you are not well. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 8, 2023 19:06:21 GMT
In some societies, Dave the scaffolder will have become an adult at 13. In others, he will have become an adult at 18. Weird, isn't it? How can he be a man in one society but not in another? According to you, one society has to be correct. The truth is that neither society is correct. Adulthood is a social construct. Everything depends on the defining criterion in the society in question. It's the same with sex or gender or whatever. Everything will depend on society's defining criterion. This society sounds a little confused. Yes. It will be very confusing to some. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2023 19:07:56 GMT
So long as you ignore reality there is no proof you will accept, and that's because you're supportive of the genocidal process as indicated by your first post.
|
|
