Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2023 8:27:28 GMT
I think that there is a lot of truth in what is said in the OP but I also think that people denying factual evidence and observeable reality in favour of a pre conceived narrative that they are emotionally invested in is not new or confined to the right. Based on my experience it's just what most people are like, it's just been more visible on the right recently as people like Trump, Johnson etc have tapped into it. really? - I'm not convinced that it was the 'right' who were stating that women can have a penis, you can grow a cervix or that men can suffer from endometriosis. No, but you are demonstrating that you are as obsessed with the subject as anyone. When do you ever hear me bringing it up?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2023 8:31:49 GMT
Like I said Trump didn't start it it's been around as long as people have been probably. Trump is a high profile public figure that has recently tapped into it. You can argue Obama did the same in a slightly more subtle way with his hope slogans. Or the 'white heat of technology" What you are describing here is politics - ie distinct world views fostered for political reasons. I'm talking about something rather more dramatic that started appearing in the social media age (2010). The shift is that these views no longer have any significant overlap or are not subsets of a significant shared wider view. I realise i'm describing social disintegration. I also have a theory about why it happened and the tactic of continuous escalation that caused it. There is definitely a tendency for people to increasingly occupy their own echo chambers, many of which consist of fake realities that are to their liking. We see this problem infecting government itself. Many of the clowns in government demonstrate, occupying a realty that does not resemble actual reality anywhere as closely as it should. This is demonstrably true of both main parties in fact.
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Nov 17, 2023 8:53:26 GMT
I think that there is a lot of truth in what is said in the OP but I also think that people denying factual evidence and observeable reality in favour of a pre conceived narrative that they are emotionally invested in is not new or confined to the right. Based on my experience it's just what most people are like, it's just been more visible on the right recently as people like Trump, Johnson etc have tapped into it. really? - I'm not convinced that it was the 'right' who were stating that women can have a penis, you can grow a cervix or that men can suffer from endometriosis. That's a fringe issue, Trump was coming out with bonkers nonsense like injecting bleach into people whilst he was in the White House.
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Nov 17, 2023 9:08:42 GMT
That's because there IS a conspiracy of remainers trying to drag us back into the EU - and they're almost certainly encouraged and funded by the EU. Why do you think it so long to leave the EU and the remainers actually hijacked the govt's agenda and passed the Surrender Law (the Benn act) making it illegal to leave the EU without their permission FFS. As for the scientists they're not lying. Some believe that climate change is happening and is caused by CO2and some believe that climate change is happening but it's not caused by CO2 but by other factors. There are many different views - scientists often don't all agree. The liars are the politicians and media who claim the science is settled. It's not. Stating your conspiracy theory to be a fact without evidence does not make it so. It is just a doubling down on your alternate reality. And 97% of climate scientists following the science, attempt the almost certain reality that man made global warming is happening. That is about as settled as science ever gets. But you dont want to believe it so it cannot be true, and is presumably explicable only by a conspiracy theory? I think you have to be VERY naive to believe that there aren't a group of remainers who are working to get the UK back into the EU. They don't even deny it themselves. And the 97% figure is false - as has been explained many times. It's also scientifically illiterate because science is not determined by a poll of what scientists think. It's dependent on having a theory that makes accurate predictions. Sadly the CO2 theory does not. These are not examples of "alternate reality", whatever that means. They're just examples of assessing the situation rationally.
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Nov 17, 2023 9:39:24 GMT
There is definitely a tendency for people to increasingly occupy their own echo chambers, many of which consist of fake realities that are to their liking. We see this problem infecting government itself. Many of the clowns in government demonstrate, occupying a realty that does not resemble actual reality anywhere as closely as it should. This is demonstrably true of both main parties in fact. The best researchers sift FACTS first … then build THEORY. … then more FACTS sustain that theory. I got the impression some of your criticism in your OP might have been targeting some of the content and comments I have dropped on this … and our last Forum … which you are welcome to pick apart .. if you can. Most opt to shut me down and these platforms. Aren’t you just another one trying to shoot the ‘messenger’? “I’m just here to just question our Reality” is under my posts because this is the debate here … as computers communicate ideas and our ‘News’ through a ‘virtual reality’ that can easily be manipulated and distorted. We are here to sift and discuss what is REAL. … It’s just a bit of fun … why see it as a threat? … I put a ‘like’ on your OP because it was well-written and expressed exactly the ‘fault’ of those currently ‘in charge’ … a religious belief they and their MSM that censors Public opinion … delivers the ‘TRUTH’ …and will happily brush aside the FACTS that sustain a Conspiracy Theory from a questioning Public. CT’s soon die unless they have accompanying FACTS giving them a longevity online … certainly long enough to bother the bullying arrogance of the MSM and Deep State manipulators that make our lives a struggle and misery. Why defend their programme? Now they are ‘running scared’ this Resistance Movement to their ‘TRUTH’ has reached a tipping point … and unless they shut down FREE SPEECH …. their tyranny will come crashing down … and they will be strung up by their ears for all their arguable ‘lies’?? …. Didn’t the Nazis find themselves in such a position @1944-5? … that position Zionists and Islamists are finding themselves today?? …exposed for ethnic cleansing and genocide pogroms? “Yesterday’s Conspiracy Theory is tomorrow’s Conspiracy Fact” people say. Hmmm. 50 years ago I sifted good evidence from top civilian and military sources … and got bitten by a bug that UFO and Alien visitation was real … it started as a small band of marginalised “crackpots” that the MSM ridiculed for half a century … because religion controlled the MSM. IT STILL DOES … but we are making progress this ‘TRUTH’ will eventually come out … as Disclosure hits Congress and some Media outlets with a smidge of integrity left blow the whistle. It can be argued …. Only when the religious tyranny running Western MSM and controlling science thinking is crumbled into dust will our Society, FREE SPEECH and Humanity be restored. Btw … [P.S. Apologies … it was me who suggested the UK should morally leave NATO … look up the timeline of those Comments expressed more than once … Trump just jumped on the bandwagon of that suggestion … and applied it to America … to detach Western Democracies from the control of crazy Dr Strangelove Zionist Nazis run by the Stoltenberg/Soros Posse entrenched in the Pentagon. It’s not an unreasonable suggestion. … Naturally it will incense the one’s who hated Trump building detente with Putin + rigged an election to have him ousted.]
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 17, 2023 9:48:24 GMT
Stating your conspiracy theory to be a fact without evidence does not make it so. It is just a doubling down on your alternate reality. And 97% of climate scientists following the science, attempt the almost certain reality that man made global warming is happening. That is about as settled as science ever gets. But you dont want to believe it so it cannot be true, and is presumably explicable only by a conspiracy theory? I think you have to be VERY naive to believe that there aren't a group of remainers who are working to get the UK back into the EU. They don't even deny it themselves. And the 97% figure is false - as has been explained many times. It's also scientifically illiterate because science is not determined by a poll of what scientists think. It's dependent on having a theory that makes accurate predictions. Sadly the CO2 theory does not. These are not examples of "alternate reality", whatever that means. They're just examples of assessing the situation rationally. It is more than hard work. It matter little how many times one provides evidence that the 97% is at best exaggeration and at worst outright lies it still pops up with a disturbing regularity. It is also worrying that they demand one follows 'the science' yet wilfully ignore scientists who are producing 'the science' and disputing much of 'the science' that the alarmists accept.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2023 10:46:32 GMT
Stating your conspiracy theory to be a fact without evidence does not make it so. It is just a doubling down on your alternate reality. And 97% of climate scientists following the science, attempt the almost certain reality that man made global warming is happening. That is about as settled as science ever gets. But you dont want to believe it so it cannot be true, and is presumably explicable only by a conspiracy theory? I think you have to be VERY naive to believe that there aren't a group of remainers who are working to get the UK back into the EU. They don't even deny it themselves. And the 97% figure is false - as has been explained many times. It's also scientifically illiterate because science is not determined by a poll of what scientists think. It's dependent on having a theory that makes accurate predictions. Sadly the CO2 theory does not. These are not examples of "alternate reality", whatever that means. They're just examples of assessing the situation rationally. You can think whatever you like and often do. I doubt that anyone doubts the existence of Remainers who always believed Brexit was bad and would like us back in the EU. In a free country it is their right to hold that view if it is what they believe. The only supposed fact that can be challenged in all that is the assumption that Brexit is bad. Many believe it is proving to be. Others dispute that. But how good or bad Brexit is is an argument for another thread. But the existence of large numbers of Remainers is one thing. Few would dispute that. It is the notion that they are the ones secretly in charge, in the pay of the EU, and that the entire establishment is actively conspiring to sabotage us for the benefit of the EU which is rather more dubious. That is venturing into conspiracy theory territory. Conspiracy nonsense. Ultimately what will determine the eventual fate of Brexit is firstly what future generations think - and the younger ones who will make them up mostly voted Remain - but even more so how much of a success or failure it reveals itself to be over time. If it proves to be a stunning success, opposition to it will gradually melt away, with ever more former Remainers changing their minds. But if on the other hand it proves to be an abject disaster, no Remainers will change their minds and opposition to it will grow as some Leavers change their minds instead. The deciding factor as years go by will not be any conspiracy against this or for that. It will be public opinion, which in turn will be largely influenced by how much of a success or failure it reveals itself to be. As for the notion of an anti-Brexit conspiracy by the establishment, large parts of the Tory party in parliament and in the country are avidly pro-Brexit, as are large parts of the newsprint media who represent the wealthy elites, eg the Mail, the Express, the Sun. And certain radio and TV broadcasters, eg Nick Ferrari on LBC or most of the line up on GBNews. There have been a cabal of self interested groups working for Brexit and against our membership of the the EU for a very long time now. But I suppose you will call that a conspiracy theory. They do however lay the lie that the entire establishment opposed Brexit and are working to reverse it. Because a substantial chunk of it was working for it, mostly in their own self interests.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2023 10:52:44 GMT
There have always been big differences of opinion between left and right and any other imaginable way of differentiating sets of opinions. But it used to be broadly true that everyone knew what the basic facts were but just differed in what to do about them or in how to change them. Whatever our opinions, we were all generally grounded in reality. But in recent years, and indeed the problem has been developing for decades, people have started to believe in different supposed facts and alternate realities. This has not just been happening here but elsewhere too. We saw it in spades in the USA with the coming of Trump to the political scene. This disconnect from reality and belief in an alternate reality born of paranoid conspiracy theorising appears to be particularly marked on the right, though the left is not entirely immune either, always ready to see the dark hand of the deep state if something does not go well for us. But for years now the right have been nurturing the concept of a big bad EU that is dominating us and see it as a malignant force, and got into the habit of blaming it for all our ills. They also began to increasingly reject any science which did not sit well with their own lifelong ideologies. Many of them have come to believe in a conspiracy of Remainers, in cahoots with the EU, to drag us back in at any cost, with any failure of Brexit supposedly the fault of Remainers sabotaging their own country. That scientists offering evidence of man-made global warming are all somehow for some reason lying to us as part of some sort of conspiracy, and that because expressing phobic opinions is less tolerated by the majority than it used to be, freedom of speech is under dire threat as well. In this country many of them have convinced themselves of a paranoid conspiracy theory that intermeshes all these strands, by which the deep state is conspiring to subvert the will of the people by dragging us back into the EU, and if Brexit isnt working, this can only be explicable to them as sabotage by a bunch of Remainer fifth columnists working to undermine it. And all this seems to them to be part and parcel of a wider plot involving most of the world's scientists - presumably working for dark forces - to use what they assume to be fake science to gain control over us and destroy our freedoms. All of which is reinforced in their own minds by increased levels of public censure for phobic views. We see them on this forum all the time, calling the EU the EUSSR, saying that we are on the road to a Soviet dictatorship, that anyone saying unwelcome things will be put in gulags, that freedom of speech is dying if not dead. Even as they say these things with total freedom and failing to recognise the irony in that fact. It is difficult to debate sensibly with people believing in fake realities that exist only in their own heads, so we will often end up ridiculing instead. Yet so convinced are they by their fake realities that they genuinely see those of us who believe in reality, the real thing, as delusional for failing to see it their way. This is making sensible debate very difficult, even in the mind zone. And I thought it worthwhile possibly to have a debate about this problem itself. No doubt a few of them will show up soon to tell me how deluded I am, or that I am being wilfully dishonest, as they double down on their conspiracy theories. With links to "evidence" of varying degrees of dubiousness, often the outpourings of their fellow conspiracy theorists, sometimes quoting dodgy science. And recently one of their heroic truth tellers, because she is telling them what they want to hear, is - of all people - Mad Nad, Nadine Dorries - who is also herself seemingly detached from reality and a rather intellectually challenged conspiracy theorist. She too cannot believe that everything she ever believed in is turning out to be a crock of shit without invoking conspiracy theories to explain it When facts change and assumptions based on them turn out to be wrong, sensible people change their opinions. Less sensible ones invoke conspiracy theories in order to carry on thinking that they were right all along, and in order to somehow explain all that has gone wrong. There seems to be a lot of this happening on the right today. I expect some of them will be along soon to call me an idiot, delusional, someone who is part of their chosen conspiracy against them and the country, an extremist, far this or far that. But the greatest threat to democracy is people voting on the basis of fake conspiracy theories that have little to do with reality at all. I think your argument might carry more weight if it was a bot more balanced - as it is it just comes over as a whinge against the 'right', you fail to acknowledge that the 'Left' have just as many issues when it comes to believing in alternate realities.This argument might carry more weight if you gave us examples. Then I can acknowledge or refute them, in any case debate them. But it is impossible either to refute or acknowledge your assertion without hard examples. I did in my OP acknowledge that the left is not immune to conspiracy theorist thinking, citing the example of our suspicion of the deep state and readiness to believe it is behind much which undermines our cause. However, it seems to me that not just here but elsewhere too, too many on the right are conspiracy theorising themselves into an increasingly obvious disconnect from reality. The need to challenge any perceived failures in the causes they have believed in for decades, rather than have to rethink a lifelong set of ideological assumptions, is fuelling a desire to seek out or think up explanations, which in turn is driving them further from reality. We saw this in spades under Truss, with her plethora of uncosted tax cuts, mostly targeted at the already better off, which right wingers here greeted with intense enthusiasm and just what the doctor ordered and which was necessary for our economic success. But when the markets reacted badly, the economy tanked, inflation took off and interest rates soared, they could not accept that this proved them wrong. So suddenly they envisaged an unlikely alliance of stock market traders, banks, Remainers, the EU, and a mythical left wing establishment all working together to sabotage what would otherwise have worked wonderfully. Because assumptions that they have emotionally invested in for decades cannot possibly be wrong. Acknowleding that would be the intellectually and morally brave thing to do but most people find that too difficult. So instead they invent conspiracies to explain what went wrong, invoking powerful malignant forces. This is a well known phenomenon in the field of psychology. The longer we have believed in something, the more strongly we have believed in it, the more emotional investment we have placed in it, the more difficult we find it to accept that we are wrong. To avoid having to accept that something we are so deeply invested in psychologically can be wrong, which would be psychologically painful to us and liable to undermine our self confidence, our brains tend to seek other people and things to blame for what went wrong, in order to avoid having to deconstruct a cherished belief. So we assume the belief is still right and any failure of it when applied must be the fault of bad actors sabotaging it. Inventing conspiracy theories in defence of cherished beliefs if they appear to be found wanting is a tendency innate to the human psyche. It is therefore a tendency we are all potentially prone to, including we on the left. As someone who has studied psychology and is psychologically aware, I try as much as possible to guard against this in myself, but with how much success is open to dispute. However it does seem to me that in recent years, the right seems to be experiencing the greatest threats to long cherished beliefs, over climate science, Trussonomics, Brexit, and so on. And an increasing descent away from reality into conspiracy theorising seems to be the outcome. Which is pretty obvious to most of us outside their bubble, but not obvious at all to those of them in it.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 17, 2023 19:11:52 GMT
I think your argument might carry more weight if it was a bot more balanced - as it is it just comes over as a whinge against the 'right', you fail to acknowledge that the 'Left' have just as many issues when it comes to believing in alternate realities.This argument might carry more weight if you gave us examples. Then I can acknowledge or refute them, in any case debate them. But it is impossible either to refute or acknowledge your assertion without hard examples. I did in my OP acknowledge that the left is not immune to conspiracy theorist thinking, citing the example of our suspicion of the deep state and readiness to believe it is behind much which undermines our cause. However, it seems to me that not just here but elsewhere too, too many on the right are conspiracy theorising themselves into an increasingly obvious disconnect from reality. The need to challenge any perceived failures in the causes they have believed in for decades, rather than have to rethink a lifelong set of ideological assumptions, is fuelling a desire to seek out or think up explanations, which in turn is driving them further from reality. We saw this in spades under Truss, with her plethora of uncosted tax cuts, mostly targeted at the already better off, which right wingers here greeted with intense enthusiasm and just what the doctor ordered and which was necessary for our economic success. But when the markets reacted badly, the economy tanked, inflation took off and interest rates soared, they could not accept that this proved them wrong. So suddenly they envisaged an unlikely alliance of stock market traders, banks, Remainers, the EU, and a mythical left wing establishment all working together to sabotage what would otherwise have worked wonderfully. Because assumptions that they have emotionally invested in for decades cannot possibly be wrong. Acknowleding that would be the intellectually and morally brave thing to do but most people find that too difficult. So instead they invent conspiracies to explain what went wrong, invoking powerful malignant forces. This is a well known phenomenon in the field of psychology. The longer we have believed in something, the more strongly we have believed in it, the more emotional investment we have placed in it, the more difficult we find it to accept that we are wrong. To avoid having to accept that something we are so deeply invested in psychologically can be wrong, which would be psychologically painful to us and liable to undermine our self confidence, our brains tend to seek other people and things to blame for what went wrong, in order to avoid having to deconstruct a cherished belief. So we assume the belief is still right and any failure of it when applied must be the fault of bad actors sabotaging it. Inventing conspiracy theories in defence of cherished beliefs if they appear to be found wanting is a tendency innate to the human psyche. It is therefore a tendency we are all potentially prone to, including we on the left. As someone who has studied psychology and is psychologically aware, I try as much as possible to guard against this in myself, but with how much success is open to dispute. However it does seem to me that in recent years, the right seems to be experiencing the greatest threats to long cherished beliefs, over climate science, Trussonomics, Brexit, and so on. And an increasing descent away from reality into conspiracy theorising seems to be the outcome. Which is pretty obvious to most of us outside their bubble, but not obvious at all to those of them in it. The left believe diversity is good. The left believe that Multiculturalsim is working just fine. The left struggle to define racism yet are determined it should be eradicated. The left believe that no one should be offended but are quite prepared to offend, insult belittle denigrate and ignore political opponents. The left have sold their souls to Islam and believe that will work out well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2023 22:22:17 GMT
This argument might carry more weight if you gave us examples. Then I can acknowledge or refute them, in any case debate them. But it is impossible either to refute or acknowledge your assertion without hard examples. I did in my OP acknowledge that the left is not immune to conspiracy theorist thinking, citing the example of our suspicion of the deep state and readiness to believe it is behind much which undermines our cause. However, it seems to me that not just here but elsewhere too, too many on the right are conspiracy theorising themselves into an increasingly obvious disconnect from reality. The need to challenge any perceived failures in the causes they have believed in for decades, rather than have to rethink a lifelong set of ideological assumptions, is fuelling a desire to seek out or think up explanations, which in turn is driving them further from reality. We saw this in spades under Truss, with her plethora of uncosted tax cuts, mostly targeted at the already better off, which right wingers here greeted with intense enthusiasm and just what the doctor ordered and which was necessary for our economic success. But when the markets reacted badly, the economy tanked, inflation took off and interest rates soared, they could not accept that this proved them wrong. So suddenly they envisaged an unlikely alliance of stock market traders, banks, Remainers, the EU, and a mythical left wing establishment all working together to sabotage what would otherwise have worked wonderfully. Because assumptions that they have emotionally invested in for decades cannot possibly be wrong. Acknowleding that would be the intellectually and morally brave thing to do but most people find that too difficult. So instead they invent conspiracies to explain what went wrong, invoking powerful malignant forces. This is a well known phenomenon in the field of psychology. The longer we have believed in something, the more strongly we have believed in it, the more emotional investment we have placed in it, the more difficult we find it to accept that we are wrong. To avoid having to accept that something we are so deeply invested in psychologically can be wrong, which would be psychologically painful to us and liable to undermine our self confidence, our brains tend to seek other people and things to blame for what went wrong, in order to avoid having to deconstruct a cherished belief. So we assume the belief is still right and any failure of it when applied must be the fault of bad actors sabotaging it. Inventing conspiracy theories in defence of cherished beliefs if they appear to be found wanting is a tendency innate to the human psyche. It is therefore a tendency we are all potentially prone to, including we on the left. As someone who has studied psychology and is psychologically aware, I try as much as possible to guard against this in myself, but with how much success is open to dispute. However it does seem to me that in recent years, the right seems to be experiencing the greatest threats to long cherished beliefs, over climate science, Trussonomics, Brexit, and so on. And an increasing descent away from reality into conspiracy theorising seems to be the outcome. Which is pretty obvious to most of us outside their bubble, but not obvious at all to those of them in it. The left believe diversity is good. The left believe that Multiculturalsim is working just fine. The left struggle to define racism yet are determined it should be eradicated. The left believe that no one should be offended but are quite prepared to offend, insult belittle denigrate and ignore political opponents. The left have sold their souls to Islam and believe that will work out well. If that is the best you can do, you havent got much. None of that constitutes a conspiracy theory, and some of it rests upon risible and simplistic assumptions of your own, eg the notion that people like me have supposedly "sold our souls" to Islam. When in fact all we are guilty of is believing that just because someone is a Muslim does not make them automatically bad. You appear to be observing this live and let live attitude of ours towards Muslims through the prism of what appears to be your own innate Islamophobia
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 17, 2023 22:22:38 GMT
really? - I'm not convinced that it was the 'right' who were stating that women can have a penis, you can grow a cervix or that men can suffer from endometriosis. That's a fringe issue, Trump was coming out with bonkers nonsense like injecting bleach into people whilst he was in the White House. I'm not sure you will get many agreeing that womens rights are a fringe issue - it was one of the main reasons that caused the SNP's collapse in support in Scotland.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2023 23:25:57 GMT
The left believe diversity is good. The left believe that Multiculturalsim is working just fine. The left struggle to define racism yet are determined it should be eradicated. The left believe that no one should be offended but are quite prepared to offend, insult belittle denigrate and ignore political opponents. The left have sold their souls to Islam and believe that will work out well. If that is the best you can do, you havent got much. None of that constitutes a conspiracy theory, and some of it rests upon risible and simplistic assumptions of your own, eg the notion that people like me have supposedly "sold our souls" to Islam. When in fact all we are guilty of is believing that just because someone is a Muslim does not make them automatically bad. You appear to be observing this live and let live attitude of ours towards Muslims through the prism of what appears to be your own innate Islamophobia I don't see a problem with it. The fact that you automatically accuse somebody of Islamophobia for stating a fact demonstrates how perverse your reasoning really is. Obviously your outburst is designed to try and shut somebody down, like screaming racism, which is what the Left do all of the time. It's why you hide behind abuse. Guess what, you're not in control and the rest of us know that. You're just somebody else's little tool.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2023 23:42:48 GMT
I think you have to be VERY naive to believe that there aren't a group of remainers who are working to get the UK back into the EU. They don't even deny it themselves. And the 97% figure is false - as has been explained many times. It's also scientifically illiterate because science is not determined by a poll of what scientists think. It's dependent on having a theory that makes accurate predictions. Sadly the CO2 theory does not. These are not examples of "alternate reality", whatever that means. They're just examples of assessing the situation rationally. It is more than hard work. It matter little how many times one provides evidence that the 97% is at best exaggeration and at worst outright lies it still pops up with a disturbing regularity. It is also worrying that they demand one follows 'the science' yet wilfully ignore scientists who are producing 'the science' and disputing much of 'the science' that the alarmists accept. Submission without question is mandatory under Islam and the Left.
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Nov 18, 2023 0:11:53 GMT
That's a fringe issue, Trump was coming out with bonkers nonsense like injecting bleach into people whilst he was in the White House. I'm not sure you will get many agreeing that womens rights are a fringe issue - it was one of the main reasons that caused the SNP's collapse in support in Scotland. I find it odd how lefties pontificate that 50% of the population are irrelevant , anyone see the bonkers nonsense Labours ridiculous ignoramous Lisa Nandy came out with? Men calling themselves women/girls are the most discriminated against groups according to her and she doesn't think body parts (as she puts it) matter.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Nov 18, 2023 4:36:56 GMT
There have always been big differences of opinion between left and right and any other imaginable way of differentiating sets of opinions. But it used to be broadly true that everyone knew what the basic facts were but just differed in what to do about them or in how to change them. Whatever our opinions, we were all generally grounded in reality.You've sleep walked straight into that one. The Left have long since removed themselves from reality. As they believe women can have penises. The Left don't ground themselves in reality anymore, they ground themselves in 'feelings' and 'identity'. The Left also believe the mythical phenomenon of 'white privilege' is real, too. They weren't deemed "Loony" for no reason, you know. Today, many have become certifiable.
|
|