|
Post by sandypine on Oct 13, 2023 14:49:25 GMT
One of lucky 'winners' of ww1? Lucky? The mandate was a poisoned chalice. Of course it was, there were about a dozen British reports and initiatives scuppered by both sides who were both largely intransigent and arguments ensued over what we would regard as trivia. One of the worst was where the Arabs demanded the British remove a wooden screen at the Wailing wall as they said it represented a synagogue, the man had placed the screen to shield his praying from women worshippers. The British obliged and the man clung on to his screen desperately and was severely injured. I seem to recall this led to much violence. But it is upon such things that we were obliged to make decisions and clearly there was no winning. In the ME the art of compromise has long ago faded.
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Oct 13, 2023 15:05:40 GMT
Disperse all the people, Nuke both Palestine and Israel, and make them barren uninhabitable for the next 1000 years, because it's NEVER going to end EVER. Sorry to say it's the only solution, let them get on with their lives elsewhere, and hope their legacy never lives on.
Or better still ...
Chernobyl will be habitable again in about 20,000 years due to the long-lasting effects of ground absorption of radiation. Visiting Chernobyl is now considered safe, but there are still risks associated with touring due to the structural instability of the ruins.
20,000 sounds better.
Great minds and all that link
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 13, 2023 15:24:11 GMT
Disperse all the people, Nuke both Palestine and Israel, and make them barren uninhabitable for the next 1000 years, because it's NEVER going to end EVER. Sorry to say it's the only solution, let them get on with their lives elsewhere, and hope their legacy never lives on.
Or better still ...
Chernobyl will be habitable again in about 20,000 years due to the long-lasting effects of ground absorption of radiation. Visiting Chernobyl is now considered safe, but there are still risks associated with touring due to the structural instability of the ruins.
20,000 sounds better.
Great minds and all that linkAgreed, there is no solution, there is no give and take, and the rest of the world can't go along with this, it impacts every country with its domino effect, how many more lives, how much more pain and suffering does it take before we do the right thing, .... let the UN clear out both countries, NUKE them and be done, that's it then, it's out of their hands we've solved it for them.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Oct 13, 2023 15:36:43 GMT
Perhaps it's time to 'think the unthinkable' and imagine a Jewish national home somewhere else other than the Middle East.
"The British left the country because more and more of them had come to realize that the Balfour Declaration had been a mistake - something various officials had said twenty years earlier...This was a widespread feeling. In both Jerusalem and London once again many thought that Jews had influence on American policy, just as in World War I. Then the feeling had spurred the British to conquer Palestine; now they were inclined to leave it. 'The American press and American Zionists are responsible for the present troubles in Palestine,' Chief Secretary Gurney wrote in his diary, adding 'The sooner we go the better'"[489-490]
Tom Segev, One Palestine Complete: Jews and Arabs under the British Mandate, 2000, Metropolitan Books, New York.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 13, 2023 17:06:54 GMT
The UK - we were in charge. That's nonsense. No land was given to the Arabs, they continued to live where they had lived for centuries. There were very few Jews in Ottoman Palestine - around 83,000 at the start of the mandate. This figure would grow six-fold to 490,000 before immigration was halted in 1939.
In 1922 89% of the population was Arab.
The UK inherited the Palestine Mandate after WW1 and over 50% of the land mass was spun off into the independent state of Transjordan in 1946. The mandate required the UK to create a national home for the Jewish people.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 13, 2023 17:07:59 GMT
In early 1917 the war effort had reached a stalemate. Although the United States had declared war on Germany in April it was far from fully engaged - it would be late in the year before it even suffered a single casualty. The British government recognised the power of the Jewish lobby to influence US policy so it undertook to enlist the Jewish community for the Allied war effort.
To that end the Balfour Declaration was issued in November 1917, which read:
Foreign Office November 2nd, 1917
Dear Lord Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you. on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet
His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours,
Arthur James Balfour
That notwithstanding, some two years earlier the Arabs then living in the area had been led to believe by representatives of the British government that, in return for launching a revolt against against the Ottoman Empire, they would be granted independence and political control over all former Ottoman possessions in the region, including Palestine.
Thus the 'twice-promised land'.
This is the root cause of all present problems in the region.
I would like to see the proof that Palestine was promised to the Palestinian Arabs, from what I have read in the past freedom for the Arabs from Ottoman control was promised but Palestine was not specifically named. Although as I understand it the Arabs expected Palestine to be included. I find it peculiar that the Jews who were also living in Palestine, and had been for a lot longer than the Muslim Arabs, didn't seem to be addressed as people of Palestine. The root cause of Palestinian aggression against the Jews. (ignoring previous occasional Arab violence and Pogroms against the Jews in Palestine) began many years earlier (around the mid 1850s) when the none Arab Ottomans removed the curse of being a Dhimmi from the Jews. That meant that the Jews were then free people in their own land (again), having the right to buy property and land. An Arab delegation had a meeting with the Ottomans where they complained about Jews buying land in Palestine, they were told that the Jews were allowed to buy land and property anywhere except in Mecca and Medina. That did not go down well with the Palestinian Arabs who thought of Palestine as being theirs. Thus, the seeds of violence were sown.
|
|
|
Post by Hutchyns on Oct 13, 2023 17:17:02 GMT
Dan Dare A number of youngsters, with nothing more than a tentative grasp that a Jewish homeland was required after World War II, based in a large part on the shocking mistreatment of Jews, suggest it should have been incumbent upon Europe to give up land for the new State. However I've also seen older observers suggest that Palestine seemed like a poor choice from the word go. If the plot decided upon was really the best they could do, and couldn't be foreseen as a recipe for ongoing bad feeling and conflict, then it's still high time some serious diplomacy was undertaken to improve matters ...... given their startling success recently, the Chinese would seem to be the obvious ones to ask to try to resolve things, and no guesses for who needs to be kept well away ! ...... although they'd be ideal next door neighbours if a new national home is established, as some, most probably with tongue firmly in cheek, have pointed out on social media.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 13, 2023 20:01:52 GMT
The UN Partition Plan was never going to be accepted by the Arabs given that two thirds of the land in Mandate Palestine was to be allocated to the Jewish state which only had around a third of the population. Britain, in particular, abstained from the UN vote and refused to impose the plan on the Palestinians. It was never implemented since the day after the Mandate expired the Arab-Israeli war began. I think it should be remembered that the Negev Desert makes up a large part of Israel. "The statement “the Negev desert dominates its southern half” is true. The Negev occupies over 55% of Israel’s land area (over 4,700sq miles) 3. It is an inverted-triangular shaped region whose eastern boundary is in the valley of Arabah and western border is contiguous with the Sinai Peninsula". Yes, and months before the mandate ended the Palestinians and 5 Muslim armies threatened to destroy any Israeli state that made an appearance.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Oct 14, 2023 6:30:32 GMT
Regarding the tongue in cheek depiction above of Eretz Israel in North America, it's worth noting that the state of Israel is smaller than New Jersey, one of the smaller states in the USA.
Head further west and you come across states like Utah, ten times the size of Israel and very sparsely populated. Much of the state is owned by the federal BLM so there would be no difficulty with tenure or difficulties with neighbours should the US decide to cease paying the multi-billion dollars it sends in aid every year and gift an Israel-sized piece of Utah (say) instead.
What's not to like.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Oct 14, 2023 6:33:58 GMT
"I think it should be remembered that the Negev Desert makes up a large part of Israel." The Israelis don't seem to see this as a problem. After all, aren't we always being told they've made the desert bloom? Israel made the desert bloom
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 14, 2023 7:19:54 GMT
Regarding the tongue in cheek depiction above of Eretz Israel in North America, it's worth noting that the state of Israel is smaller than New Jersey, one of the smaller states in the USA. Head further west and you come across states like Utah, ten times the size of Israel and very sparsely populated. Much of the state is owned by the federal BLM so there would be no difficulty with tenure or difficulties with neighbours should the US decide to cease paying the multi-billion dollars it sends in aid every year and gift an Israel-sized piece of Utah (say) instead. What's not to like. The absence of the connection to the land and to the history of the Jewish people. Despite 1400 years of being treated as second class citizens in their own land that had been changed into an apartheid state by Arab Muslims, and despite occasional attacks and pogroms in some areas causing many Jews to seek freedom elsewhere, there were still 13 Jewish towns, 657 Jewish villages along with some Jewish communities still in existence in Palestine in 1850. Incidentally, shouldn't they be referred to as Palestinian Jews?
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 14, 2023 7:25:07 GMT
"I think it should be remembered that the Negev Desert makes up a large part of Israel." The Israelis don't seem to see this as a problem. After all, aren't we always being told they've made the desert bloom? Israel made the desert bloomCorrect, they did by using their initiative, their know how and their intention to improve matters, all of which which they had offered to share with the Arabs if a friendly two state solution had been accepted. "Wastewater undergoes secondary biological and tertiary soil aquifer treatment and is sent to the Negev Desert, where more than 60% of the agriculture is irrigated by Shafdan (reclaimed) water.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Oct 14, 2023 7:31:16 GMT
Jews have not been a significant presence in what became Mandate Palestine since the Roman-Jewish Wars led to the Diaspora in the 2nd century.
It's ludicrous to claim a 'people' should have a right to re-occupy physical territory which ceased to be their de facto homeland almost two thousand years ago.
What if we said, Right everybody, back to where you were in 1 AD. Most of the English would have to move back to Schleswig-Holstein or Jutland, and Italians would be dispersed all across Europe, North Africa and the Middle East (including Israel).
There is no rationale reason to accept claims of Jewish particularism in that regard. Most Israeli Jews have closer ancestral ties to the former Pale of Settlement than Palestine.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 14, 2023 7:50:14 GMT
Jews have not been a significant presence in what became Mandate Palestine since the Roman-Jewish Wars led to the Diaspora in the 2nd century. It's ludicrous to claim a 'people' should have a right to re-occupy physical territory which ceased to be their de facto homeland almost two thousand years ago. What if we said, Right everybody, back to where you were in 1 AD. Most of the English would have to move back to Schleswig-Holstein or Jutland, and Italians would be dispersed all across Europe, North Africa and the Middle East (including Israel). There is no rationale reason to accept claims of Jewish particularism in that regard. Most Israeli Jews have closer ancestral ties to the former Pale of Settlement than Palestine. There is the reality that Jews have lived and remained living in Palestine for thousands of years, their numbers were kept low by Muslim Arabs who took control some 1500 years ago. It is ridiculous to dismiss any and all claim to some area of Palestine by the Jews. Your what if, is just your imagination running wild. Palestine was not a country it was a remnant of the Ottoman control. While you are using your imagination, try this one. The Muslims, while some are still living in Mecca and Medina were forced out of the area 1500 years ago and are still denied any Jurisdiction over any part of these areas. Do you think the Muslims would ever settle for second best in that position?
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Oct 14, 2023 8:00:38 GMT
OK, taking your argument as read, is it rational to have the world permanently on the precipice of a nuclear war just so the Jews can inhabit their preferred piece of real estate?
How many Muslim-Jewish wars have there been since the state of Israel was founded and is there any reason to believe there won't be more in the future?
|
|