|
Post by Einhorn on Oct 13, 2023 10:26:38 GMT
The decision that Tory laws criminalising refugee dinghy arrivals are contrary to international law. got a link? It was well publicised, Doc. A UN official representing the UN Secretary General (?) gave evidence at the High Court that the legislation contravened the Refugee Convention. You won't have any problems finding your own links.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 13, 2023 10:38:15 GMT
The UK - we were in charge.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 13, 2023 10:38:54 GMT
It was well publicised, Doc. A UN official representing the UN Secretary General (?) gave evidence at the High Court that the legislation contravened the Refugee Convention. You won't have any problems finding your own links. OK - if you cannot be arsed then I certainly can't be bothered to go on a wild goose hunt.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Oct 13, 2023 11:05:37 GMT
The UK - we were in charge. That's nonsense. No land was given to the Arabs, they continued to live where they had lived for centuries. There were very few Jews in Ottoman Palestine - around 83,000 at the start of the mandate. This figure would grow six-fold to 490,000 before immigration was halted in 1939.
In 1922 89% of the population was Arab.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Oct 13, 2023 11:51:13 GMT
One of lucky 'winners' of ww1?
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Oct 13, 2023 11:53:05 GMT
See my earlier response to Pacifico who claimed the same thing.
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Oct 13, 2023 12:44:18 GMT
It was well publicised, Doc. A UN official representing the UN Secretary General (?) gave evidence at the High Court that the legislation contravened the Refugee Convention. You won't have any problems finding your own links. OK - if you cannot be arsed then I certainly can't be bothered to go on a wild goose hunt. Are you seriously saying you don't recall the UN representative's objections to the legislation? Really, Doc?
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Oct 13, 2023 12:53:11 GMT
See my earlier response to Pacifico who claimed the same thing. On grounds of fairness you might have a point or you might not. If you intend to partition an area to protect a minority, you obviously can't use the fact that they are minority to say all of it goes to the majority.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Oct 13, 2023 13:05:03 GMT
The British never had any intention to partition Palestine.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 13, 2023 13:21:07 GMT
Disperse all the people, Nuke both Palestine and Israel, and make them barren uninhabitable for the next 1000 years, because it's NEVER going to end EVER. Sorry to say it's the only solution, let them get on with their lives elsewhere, and hope their legacy never lives on.
Or better still ...
Chernobyl will be habitable again in about 20,000 years due to the long-lasting effects of ground absorption of radiation. Visiting Chernobyl is now considered safe, but there are still risks associated with touring due to the structural instability of the ruins.
20,000 sounds better.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Oct 13, 2023 13:25:21 GMT
The British never had any intention to partition Palestine. Humm.. It was the UN
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Oct 13, 2023 14:24:17 GMT
The UK - we were in charge. That's nonsense. No land was given to the Arabs, they continued to live where they had lived for centuries. There were very few Jews in Ottoman Palestine - around 83,000 at the start of the mandate. This figure would grow six-fold to 490,000 before immigration was halted in 1939.
In 1922 89% of the population was Arab.
But surely if the Arabs objected to Jewish immigration they were being racially selective and as such the left should have had no truck with them. Another example of leftist hypocrisy.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Oct 13, 2023 14:25:47 GMT
The British never had any intention to partition Palestine. I thought they gave quite a bit to Jordan.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Oct 13, 2023 14:29:22 GMT
I think racially selective may be putting it too politely - there has been ethnic cleansing going on in the middle east for centuries.
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Oct 13, 2023 14:41:46 GMT
One of lucky 'winners' of ww1? Lucky? The mandate was a poisoned chalice.
|
|