Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2023 21:49:42 GMT
Indeed. Think about it: Proxy wars. We (as in "The West") are funding Ukraine vs Russia. Russia is losing, or at least bogging down, in Ukraine. Israel is a Western proxy, so what better for Russia than to divide Western attention/funding by provoking a conflict with Israel. Let's face it: Those dimwits in Hamas don't usually have the training or funding to pull off something on the scale that they just did. My money's on Russia (but yeah, I dare say that Iran were in there too). Except that the difference is that the overwhelming majority of British people are backing our government in supporting Ukraine. The situation in Israel / Gaza is completely different, because British public opinion is not united, it is split, and whilst no one in their right minds would support what Hamas did to innocent Israeli civilians, millions of Britons support the Palestinian cause, and bitterly oppose Israels killing of thousands of Palestinians. A proxy war might be supported in the United States, but not here, and not in Europe
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 30, 2023 22:31:59 GMT
Well thats not true Sid - Israel gave back Gaza 20 years ago and were not intending to go back until they came under attack. Israel has a right to defend itself. Wrong, the Gaza Strip according to Israel is an autonomous self governing part of Israel, it is not an independent state. Every day, Israeli extrimists steal land on the West Bank, Looks like you are all over the place here Sid - are you talking about the West Bank or Gaza?. Because if you are talking about the West Bank then what is the excuse for the current slaughter by the Gaza residents - who Israel withdrew from 20 years ago.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 30, 2023 22:34:54 GMT
Well thats not true Sid - Israel gave back Gaza 20 years ago and were not intending to go back until they came under attack. Israel has a right to defend itself. I am afraid that it is true that Israeli settlers, fully backed by the IDF and Israeli government, have been stealing land that is not theirs. And whilst we have not helped them do this, we have done nothing much to stop them either.
why do you think this has anything to do with us? ..and how would you propose 'we' stop them anyway?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2023 23:32:10 GMT
Wrong, the Gaza Strip according to Israel is an autonomous self governing part of Israel, it is not an independent state. Every day, Israeli extrimists steal land on the West Bank, Looks like you are all over the place here Sid - are you talking about the West Bank or Gaza?. Because if you are talking about the West Bank then what is the excuse for the current slaughter by the Gaza residents - who Israel withdrew from 20 years ago. I am refering to The Occupied Territories, meaning Gaza and The West Bank Israel may have unilaterally withdrawn from Gaza, but Israel controls almost all of its borders and border crossings, except one, Israel controls the airspace, and it controls the coast and the sea off Gaza, isreal controls what goes into Gaza, and what comes out of Gaza. The murder of Israeli citizens was by Hamas extremists, which does not give Israel any reason or right to kill almost 8000 Palestinian civilians including 4000 children. What Hamas did does not excuse Israel for cutting off water to all of the residents of Gaza, or to cut electricity, or to stop vital supplies from entering Gaza.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2023 23:37:13 GMT
I am afraid that it is true that Israeli settlers, fully backed by the IDF and Israeli government, have been stealing land that is not theirs. And whilst we have not helped them do this, we have done nothing much to stop them either.
why do you think this has anything to do with us? ..and how would you propose 'we' stop them anyway? We can make the sale of arms to Israel dependent upon them doing the right thing as we have been known to do with other nations. Or employ economic pressure which was in the end effective against apartheid South Africa. And why are any foreign misdeeds anything to do with us? Why are we the least bit bothered about Chinese civil rights abuses? Or torture in this or that foreign regime? Or indeed the massacre of Israelis by Hamas? We make such things our business because we want to champion good in the world and fight against evil and injustice. Something you are usually in favour of until it comes to the usual blind spot about Israeli misdeeds, when it suddenly - conveniently - becomes none of our business.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 31, 2023 7:55:56 GMT
why do you think this has anything to do with us? ..and how would you propose 'we' stop them anyway? We can make the sale of arms to Israel dependent upon them doing the right thing as we have been known to do with other nations. Or employ economic pressure which was in the end effective against apartheid South Africa. And why are any foreign misdeeds anything to do with us? Why are we the least bit bothered about Chinese civil rights abuses? Or torture in this or that foreign regime? Or indeed the massacre of Israelis by Hamas? We make such things our business because we want to champion good in the world and fight against evil and injustice. Something you are usually in favour of until it comes to the usual blind spot about Israeli misdeeds, when it suddenly - conveniently - becomes none of our business. I think you are getting me confused with someone else - I am almost always against getting involved in foreign spats. If there is a quarrel in a faraway country, between people of whom we know nothing - then I'm quite relaxed about staying out of it. You tend to find it's those on the Left who start clutching their pearls, wailing about the children and demanding that 'something' must be done. This thread highlighting that perfectly.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 31, 2023 7:57:55 GMT
Looks like you are all over the place here Sid - are you talking about the West Bank or Gaza?. Because if you are talking about the West Bank then what is the excuse for the current slaughter by the Gaza residents - who Israel withdrew from 20 years ago. I am refering to The Occupied Territories, meaning Gaza and The West Bank Israel may have unilaterally withdrawn from Gaza, but Israel controls almost all of its borders and border crossings, except one, Israel controls the airspace, and it controls the coast and the sea off Gaza, isreal controls what goes into Gaza, and what comes out of Gaza. The murder of Israeli citizens was by Hamas extremists, which does not give Israel any reason or right to kill almost 8000 Palestinian civilians including 4000 children. What Hamas did does not excuse Israel for cutting off water to all of the residents of Gaza, or to cut electricity, or to stop vital supplies from entering Gaza. So if Israel withdrew from the West Bank as she did from Gaza would that make her any more safer? - the experience of Gaza shows that to be a rather a forlorn hope.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 31, 2023 8:09:25 GMT
Except that the difference is that the overwhelming majority of British people are backing our government in supporting Ukraine. The situation in Israel / Gaza is completely different, because British public opinion is not united, it is split, and whilst no one in their right minds would support what Hamas did to innocent Israeli civilians, millions of Britons support the Palestinian cause, and bitterly oppose Israels killing of thousands of Palestinians... Yet again, you are confusing your opinion with public opinion. Outside of the Islamo-Left, the majority of the public stand behind Israel. We are sick of Islamic aggression.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 31, 2023 9:08:01 GMT
No one has suggested that the plight of the Israelis justified the killing of innocent civilians, To suggest that, means that you have either never understood my point, or you have chosen to distort my point, that is what suggests that you could be anti-Semitic. Its likely a product of your "hopeless bias". You could try giving your own head a wobble. Extremists Jews? The word Hagenah is the Jewish word for 'Defender' The NEED for the Jews to supply those on the other side of the blockade was a paramount need. The survival of Israel could well depend on a clear road for movement. "citing as justification", is putting it mildly, a nasty untruth. It never happened except in your own mind. Unfortunately, for you, you are not discussing my thinking, you are discussing your own thinking and projecting your thoughts onto me. It was not the Haganah who were primarily responsible for the Deir Yassin massacre but extremist elements like the Stern Gang. And it was you who accused me of not understanding the Israeli position by being critical of the Deir Yassin massacre. How else is that to be interpreted other than a plea on your part to explain away the massacre as an exigency of war? After first trying to call it a battle. I have been even-handed, condemning both Jewish and Arab massacres. I'm not the biased one around here, sunlight. And you and your ilk are forever throwing accusations of anti-semitism around at the drop of a hat in an obvious attempt to silence critics of Israel. Apparently, criticising Jewish extremists for a historical massacre is anti semitic in your eyes. I guess I must be anti-American for being a critic of the My Lai massacre. And anti-British for being critical of the Amritsar massacre. Or perhaps you calling me an anti-semite is a baseless slur and insult entirely without foundation, which is typical of the Labour right wing you so identify with. If you can point out where I have been anti-semitic - with quotes - then go right ahead, but at the moment if you even try you are going to quickly make yourself look both biased and stupid, not to mention malicious and mendacious. Because criticising a bunch of armed Jewish extremists for initiating a massacre of civilians in the 1940s does not constitute anti-semitism. To prove that it does you would have to demonstrate that I hold the entire Jewish people responsible for that on the assumption that all Jews are bad. Good luck with proving that one because I dont think that and never have, so am unlikely to have ever said such a thing. So you can shove your malicious, dishonest, and nasty accusations where the sun don't shine. And swivel. 1. Again I have to point out that it was a battle. It was caused by restrictions placed on the Israeli need to be ready to fight for their survival against 5 Arab Muslim armies. That information, is not in any way an excuse for the killing of civilians. But it would play a part in the problems of Israeli needs and Palestinian Arab ANTI-SEMITIC HATRED of the Jews. No HATRED then no conflict. You choose to ignore the part played by the Arabs. 2. Rubbish, condemning massacres does not make you even handed. You are just not. 3.Once again you are projecting your feelings/thoughts onto me. Too many Arabs are clearly anti-Semitic, If they weren't there would have been a two state settlement back in 1948. 4.I have fully explained why you appear to possibly be anti-Semitic, your deviations change nothing. 5. I HAVE NEVER SAID YOU ARE ANTI-SEMITIC so your comment is another example of you arguing against your own thoughts. 6. Your last comment is an example of just how far away from reality you are.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 31, 2023 9:24:21 GMT
Funny really - in Eastern Europe, Russia is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and so quite rightly we are supporting and helping Ukraine. Meanwhile in the Middle East, Israel is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and we are helping them. To the extent that that is true, it is a product of the Palestinian Arab attempt to steal all of the Israeli land. Without the Muslim armies prepared and waiting to annihilate Israel, there would have been no reason for the Israeli military to move onto Palestinian Arab land. The result of that threat and battle is that the Palestinian Arabs lost some of their land which the Israelis, perhaps because of the continued threat to destroy Israel by some Arab or Muslim countries, began to use it as part of the defense of their homeland. A problem started by the Arabs that now looks like it has turned into a desire by Right-wing Israeli governments to dominate the whole of Palestine. As for me I am, and always have been, a fan of the Two State solution.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 31, 2023 9:42:51 GMT
The battle at Deir Yassin. "The massacre (the battle) occurred while Jewish militia sought to relieve the blockade of Jerusalem during the civil war that preceded the end of British rule in Palestine. The village put up stiffer resistance than the Jewish militias had expected and they suffered casualties, but it fell after house-to-house fighting.
We never hear about Israeli casualties at Deir Yassin.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Oct 31, 2023 9:48:01 GMT
Except that the difference is that the overwhelming majority of British people are backing our government in supporting Ukraine. The situation in Israel / Gaza is completely different, because British public opinion is not united, it is split, and whilst no one in their right minds would support what Hamas did to innocent Israeli civilians, millions of Britons support the Palestinian cause, and bitterly oppose Israels killing of thousands of Palestinians... Yet again, you are confusing your opinion with public opinion. Outside of the Islamo-Left, the majority of the public stand behind Israel. We are sick of Islamic aggression. Definitely sick of Islamic aggression, but one wrong does not justify another. www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/palestinian-killed-during-settler-assault-west-bank-town-palestinian-officials-2023-10-06/Settlers in the West Bank have carried out terrorism against Palestinian civilians. Settler terrorists should be treated exactly the same way Hamas terrorists are.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2023 10:13:25 GMT
We can make the sale of arms to Israel dependent upon them doing the right thing as we have been known to do with other nations. Or employ economic pressure which was in the end effective against apartheid South Africa. And why are any foreign misdeeds anything to do with us? Why are we the least bit bothered about Chinese civil rights abuses? Or torture in this or that foreign regime? Or indeed the massacre of Israelis by Hamas? We make such things our business because we want to champion good in the world and fight against evil and injustice. Something you are usually in favour of until it comes to the usual blind spot about Israeli misdeeds, when it suddenly - conveniently - becomes none of our business. I think you are getting me confused with someone else - I am almost always against getting involved in foreign spats. If there is a quarrel in a faraway country, between people of whom we know nothing - then I'm quite relaxed about staying out of it. You tend to find it's those on the Left who start clutching their pearls, wailing about the children and demanding that 'something' must be done. This thread highlighting that perfectly. In fact, it has always depended upon who it is. The right were far more gung ho than the left about intervening in Iraq, for example, and were always far more ready to sanction the USSR for its human rights abuses. Elements on the left tended to have a blind spot where the Soviet Union was concerned. And the right were far more solidly behind our intervention in the Gulf War than the left was. Yet the left were always the ones more likely to be critical of apartheid South Africa, or Israeli treatment of the Palestinians. So it is not true that it is always the left who are in favour of foreign interventions. Sometimes on some issues it is. But more often than not it is the right.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 31, 2023 10:19:22 GMT
The Arabs looked down their nose at the 'inferior' second class citizens, the Dhimmi, i.e. the Jews, for around 14 hundred years. IMO disrespect for the (non-Muslim) Jews by the Muslim Arabs appears to have almost entered the DNA of too many Muslim Arabs and non-Arab Muslims. 14 hundred years of amongst many other insulting norms for the Dhimmi was to be forbidden to ride a horse or to carry a sword, or any other weapon. Now the Jews are entitled to carry a weapon, and the hared of that change is, it seems to me, the root of the hatred practiced by too many Muslim Arabs that has finally led to around 50years of the exchange of hatred between Muslims and Jews. IIRC, Golda Meir once said, "There will be peace in the Middle east when the Muslims learn to love their children more than they hate us"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2023 10:30:15 GMT
It was not the Haganah who were primarily responsible for the Deir Yassin massacre but extremist elements like the Stern Gang. And it was you who accused me of not understanding the Israeli position by being critical of the Deir Yassin massacre. How else is that to be interpreted other than a plea on your part to explain away the massacre as an exigency of war? After first trying to call it a battle. I have been even-handed, condemning both Jewish and Arab massacres. I'm not the biased one around here, sunlight. And you and your ilk are forever throwing accusations of anti-semitism around at the drop of a hat in an obvious attempt to silence critics of Israel. Apparently, criticising Jewish extremists for a historical massacre is anti semitic in your eyes. I guess I must be anti-American for being a critic of the My Lai massacre. And anti-British for being critical of the Amritsar massacre. Or perhaps you calling me an anti-semite is a baseless slur and insult entirely without foundation, which is typical of the Labour right wing you so identify with. If you can point out where I have been anti-semitic - with quotes - then go right ahead, but at the moment if you even try you are going to quickly make yourself look both biased and stupid, not to mention malicious and mendacious. Because criticising a bunch of armed Jewish extremists for initiating a massacre of civilians in the 1940s does not constitute anti-semitism. To prove that it does you would have to demonstrate that I hold the entire Jewish people responsible for that on the assumption that all Jews are bad. Good luck with proving that one because I dont think that and never have, so am unlikely to have ever said such a thing. So you can shove your malicious, dishonest, and nasty accusations where the sun don't shine. And swivel. 1. Again I have to point out that it was a battle. It was caused by restrictions placed on the Israeli need to be ready to fight for their survival against 5 Arab Muslim armies. That information, is not in any way an excuse for the killing of civilians. But it would play a part in the problems of Israeli needs and Palestinian Arab ANTI-SEMITIC HATRED of the Jews. No HATRED then no conflict. You choose to ignore the part played by the Arabs. 2. Rubbish, condemning massacres does not make you even handed. You are just not. 3.Once again you are projecting your feelings/thoughts onto me. Too many Arabs are clearly anti-Semitic, If they weren't there would have been a two state settlement back in 1948. 4.I have fully explained why you appear to possibly be anti-Semitic, your deviations change nothing. 5. I HAVE NEVER SAID YOU ARE ANTI-SEMITIC so your comment is another example of you arguing against your own thoughts. 6. Your last comment is an example of just how far away from reality you are. Really? What is this that you said on October 28th at 9.07am in this very thread....? "I have given you a definition of a massacre and an example of a real massacre, yet all you can see is the atrocity of Deir Yassin. That IMO suggests that whether you are or are not your posts suggests that you are an anti-Semite."Trying to argue that my posts are anti-semitic is surely the same as calling me an anti-semite. Unless you can convincingly demonstrate that I dont actually mean what I say. Or are you going to dance around the head of a pin and deploy semantic obfuscation to mask your own duplicity and double speak? If so, it will be an inevitable bore fest best ignored.
|
|