|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 29, 2023 22:46:20 GMT
You do realise Deir Yassin was 75 years ago - we have had many more massacres since then. The latest being 3 weeks ago.. I am well aware of that. My mention of Deir Yassin was in a contextual post about the origins and history of the conflict. Others since then, most notably the seriously biased see 2, have made an issue out of trying to call the massacre a battle, then admitting it was an atrocity but trying to justify it on the strength of the plight of the Jews. Would you prefer me to let such biased re-writings of history go unchallenged? Because it is rarely something you are minded to do when it is not facts that you wish to wish away. The very conflict going on today has deep historical roots so traumatic historical events for either side are very much relevant today. And are you seriously trying to imply that I am belittling the recent massacre committed by Hamas? Of course I am not. It is all just part of the endless cycle of both sides reinforcing hatred for each other all the time. If you can find the post where I said the massacre of Israeli civilians was justified by Deir Yassin, do quote it. And if you cannot, it might serve you better if you were to speak out of the correct orifice here. Deir Yassin does not justify the atrocious Hamas terror attack and massacre. But neither does it cease to be a historical fact because of it either. Fair enough but there have been enough massacres by both sides over the years to make any attempt to explain recent actions by reference to them rather pointless. For instance would the massacre at Kfar Etzion be an excuse to flatten Gaza or would it be, as I believe, totally irrelevant?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2023 2:06:59 GMT
I am well aware of that. My mention of Deir Yassin was in a contextual post about the origins and history of the conflict. Others since then, most notably the seriously biased see 2, have made an issue out of trying to call the massacre a battle, then admitting it was an atrocity but trying to justify it on the strength of the plight of the Jews. Would you prefer me to let such biased re-writings of history go unchallenged? Because it is rarely something you are minded to do when it is not facts that you wish to wish away. The very conflict going on today has deep historical roots so traumatic historical events for either side are very much relevant today. And are you seriously trying to imply that I am belittling the recent massacre committed by Hamas? Of course I am not. It is all just part of the endless cycle of both sides reinforcing hatred for each other all the time. If you can find the post where I said the massacre of Israeli civilians was justified by Deir Yassin, do quote it. And if you cannot, it might serve you better if you were to speak out of the correct orifice here. Deir Yassin does not justify the atrocious Hamas terror attack and massacre. But neither does it cease to be a historical fact because of it either. Fair enough but there have been enough massacres by both sides over the years to make any attempt to explain recent actions by reference to them rather pointless. For instance would the massacre at Kfar Etzion be an excuse to flatten Gaza or would it be, as I believe, totally irrelevant? All the mutual massacres, atrocities, war crimes, terrorist attacks, military aggressions, and land thefts have for many decades contributed to the situation we see out there. It is particularly true of this area of the world that we cannot hope to understand the present without understanding the past. Massacres and all. And I will say this again. Massacres of Israeli civilians by Arab extremists is not justified by the plight of the Arabs, anymore than the indiscriminate bombing of Palestinian civilians would be justified by the plight of the Jews. But history matters in this part of the world perhaps more than in any other. The conflict cannot really be properly understood at all without some recourse to history in this region.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 30, 2023 9:39:39 GMT
First of all the Hagenah was formed in 1920 It was formed because of the need to defend the Jews from Arab attacks. The offshoots from Hagenah often chose to attack the would be attackers. Your refusal to give any acknowledgement to the Plight of the Jews and their need to be able to defend themselves from the armies already lined up ready to annihilate Israel is what suggests a level of anti-Semitism on your part. Your excuse for appearing to be Anti-Semitic, is a complete deviation. Your next two excuses for appearing to be anti-Semitic is distortion followed by distortion. I never made any excuse for the Jews to kill innocent civilians. I have never made any excuse for the killing of any innocent civilians, I have just filled in the full picture for you, as you do not appear to see anything that you do not want to see. I know the Jews needed to defend themselves. I have not criticised them for that. I have criticised a few extremists amongst them for committing massacres of civilians, notably at Deir Yassin. The fact that I fail to see the plight of the Jews as a justification for committing massacres does not make me an anti-semite, and if you think it does go and give your head a wobble and wake up to your own hopeless bias. Anyone seeking to defend one sides massacres of the civilians of another side is clearly biased. And no better than those seeking to justify the massacre committed by Hamas and citing the plight of the Palestinians as justification. If you were even capable of demonstrating the merest modicum of insight into your own bias you might begin to understand that. I condemn the actions of Palestinian extremists in massacring Jewish civilians, whilst citing as justification the plight of the Palestinians. I also condemn the actions of extremist Jews in massacring Arab civilians, whilst citing as justification the plight of the Jews.Any unbiased person can see that both are equally wrong. You however seem to think such conduct is ok when it is your own chosen side doing it. Your bias is so laughably obvious that your inability to see it is actually rather comical. If you don't even understand your own thinking, you are never going to persuade many others. No one has suggested that the plight of the Israelis justified the killing of innocent civilians, To suggest that, means that you have either never understood my point, or you have chosen to distort my point, that is what suggests that you could be anti-Semitic. Its likely a product of your "hopeless bias". You could try giving your own head a wobble. Extremists Jews? The word Hagenah is the Jewish word for 'Defender' The NEED for the Jews to supply those on the other side of the blockade was a paramount need. The survival of Israel could well depend on a clear road for movement. "citing as justification", is putting it mildly, a nasty untruth. It never happened except in your own mind. Unfortunately, for you, you are not discussing my thinking, you are discussing your own thinking and projecting your thoughts onto me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2023 15:04:38 GMT
I know the Jews needed to defend themselves. I have not criticised them for that. I have criticised a few extremists amongst them for committing massacres of civilians, notably at Deir Yassin. The fact that I fail to see the plight of the Jews as a justification for committing massacres does not make me an anti-semite, and if you think it does go and give your head a wobble and wake up to your own hopeless bias. Anyone seeking to defend one sides massacres of the civilians of another side is clearly biased. And no better than those seeking to justify the massacre committed by Hamas and citing the plight of the Palestinians as justification. If you were even capable of demonstrating the merest modicum of insight into your own bias you might begin to understand that. I condemn the actions of Palestinian extremists in massacring Jewish civilians, whilst citing as justification the plight of the Palestinians. I also condemn the actions of extremist Jews in massacring Arab civilians, whilst citing as justification the plight of the Jews.Any unbiased person can see that both are equally wrong. You however seem to think such conduct is ok when it is your own chosen side doing it. Your bias is so laughably obvious that your inability to see it is actually rather comical. If you don't even understand your own thinking, you are never going to persuade many others. No one has suggested that the plight of the Israelis justified the killing of innocent civilians, To suggest that, means that you have either never understood my point, or you have chosen to distort my point, that is what suggests that you could be anti-Semitic. Its likely a product of your "hopeless bias". You could try giving your own head a wobble. Extremists Jews? The word Hagenah is the Jewish word for 'Defender' The NEED for the Jews to supply those on the other side of the blockade was a paramount need. The survival of Israel could well depend on a clear road for movement. "citing as justification", is putting it mildly, a nasty untruth. It never happened except in your own mind. Unfortunately, for you, you are not discussing my thinking, you are discussing your own thinking and projecting your thoughts onto me. It was not the Haganah who were primarily responsible for the Deir Yassin massacre but extremist elements like the Stern Gang. And it was you who accused me of not understanding the Israeli position by being critical of the Deir Yassin massacre. How else is that to be interpreted other than a plea on your part to explain away the massacre as an exigency of war? After first trying to call it a battle. I have been even-handed, condemning both Jewish and Arab massacres. I'm not the biased one around here, sunshine. And you and your ilk are forever throwing accusations of anti-semitism around at the drop of a hat in an obvious attempt to silence critics of Israel. Apparently, criticising Jewish extremists for a historical massacre is anti semitic in your eyes. I guess I must be anti-American for being a critic of the My Lai massacre. And anti-British for being critical of the Amritsar massacre. Or perhaps you calling me an anti-semite is a baseless slur and insult entirely without foundation, which is typical of the Labour right wing you so identify with. If you can point out where I have been anti-semitic - with quotes - then go right ahead, but at the moment if you even try you are going to quickly make yourself look both biased and stupid, not to mention malicious and mendacious. Because criticising a bunch of armed Jewish extremists for initiating a massacre of civilians in the 1940s does not constitute anti-semitism. To prove that it does you would have to demonstrate that I hold the entire Jewish people responsible for that on the assumption that all Jews are bad. Good luck with proving that one because I dont think that and never have, so am unlikely to have ever said such a thing. So you can shove your malicious, dishonest, and nasty accusations where the sun don't shine. And swivel.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Oct 30, 2023 15:10:52 GMT
One slaughter of civilians doesn't excuse another.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2023 15:35:03 GMT
Funny really - in Eastern Europe, Russia is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and so quite rightly we are supporting and helping Ukraine.
Meanwhile in the Middle East, Israel is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and we are helping them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2023 15:38:03 GMT
Funny really - in Eastern Europe, Russia is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and so quite rightly we are supporting and helping Ukraine. Meanwhile in the Middle East, Israel is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and we are helping them. Considering the context, that is a lie.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Oct 30, 2023 15:58:29 GMT
Israel came under attack with 1400+ civilians killed in one of the worst terrorist attacks in history.
Gaza is run by a terrorist organisation committed to the destruction of Israel.
What's Israel supposed to do?
Invading and getting rid of the Hamas dictatorship is necessary.
Killing Gazan civilians has to be avoided as much as possible.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 30, 2023 17:26:30 GMT
Funny really - in Eastern Europe, Russia is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and so quite rightly we are supporting and helping Ukraine. Meanwhile in the Middle East, Israel is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and we are helping them. Well thats not true Sid - Israel gave back Gaza 20 years ago and were not intending to go back until they came under attack. Israel has a right to defend itself.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2023 20:43:14 GMT
Funny really - in Eastern Europe, Russia is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and so quite rightly we are supporting and helping Ukraine. Meanwhile in the Middle East, Israel is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and we are helping them. Well thats not true Sid - Israel gave back Gaza 20 years ago and were not intending to go back until they came under attack. Israel has a right to defend itself. I am afraid that it is true that Israeli settlers, fully backed by the IDF and Israeli government, have been stealing land that is not theirs. And whilst we have not helped them do this, we have done nothing much to stop them either. But what you say about Israel giving Gaza back is true, and yes Israel does have the right to defend itself. But in the long run, security and peace for Israel can only come about when there is justice for the Palestinians as well. This should include giving up the illegal west bank settlements and establishing a viable two state solution. But on the understanding that if the Palestinians choose leaders who want to attack Israel, or who harbour such people in their midst, Israel has the right to intervene to prevent this. Ultimately peace for everyone will have to be based on something like this or there will be no peace, just an endless cycle of tit for tat and ever more hatred from each side towards the other. Both sides have been provoking the hatred of each other for many decades now, and this hatred is being passed down the generations and constantly being reinforced. The last time sworn enemies attempted to bury the hatchet and make peace, Israeli extremists assassinated their own leader for doing so, whilst Yasser Arafat lost the support of most of his own people too. And he was quickly isolated when a right wing Israeli regime effectively tore the Oslo accords to shreds, provoked into this by Arab extremists who also never wanted peace and whom Arafat was too weak to suppress.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2023 20:52:43 GMT
Funny really - in Eastern Europe, Russia is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and so quite rightly we are supporting and helping Ukraine. Meanwhile in the Middle East, Israel is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and we are helping them. Considering the context, that is a lie. Not all of what he said is inaccurate. Long before the October 7th atrocities, Israeli settlers, backed by the army and government, have been systematically stealing land that is not theirs for their settlements for many decades now. This is an injustice which fuels Palestinian anger. I mean imagine if French settlers were stealing land in Kent and setting up French settlements, backed by the French army and government. We would feel a sense of grievance, would we not? None of that justifies what Hamas did, but nevertheless the cessation of Israeli land thefts must be part of any lasting peace. Because justified grievances on both sides need to be removed for there to be any hope of peace. Which of course means terrorists should not be free to fire rockets at Israel, still less massacre and kidnap loads of innocent civilians. Truth and reconciliation will be neccessary but right now both sides have their blood up, so the psychological basis for peace is lacking right now.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 30, 2023 21:03:06 GMT
Funny really - in Eastern Europe, Russia is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and so quite rightly we are supporting and helping Ukraine. Meanwhile in the Middle East, Israel is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and we are helping them. Funny really, I suspect that Russia is behind the current escalation in the Middle East.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2023 21:16:56 GMT
Funny really - in Eastern Europe, Russia is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and so quite rightly we are supporting and helping Ukraine. Meanwhile in the Middle East, Israel is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and we are helping them. Funny really, I suspect that Russia is behind the current escalation in the Middle East. I think it is more likely to be Iran. Though Russia is run by a leader whom we might expect to go fishing in troubled waters so you never know.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 30, 2023 21:22:09 GMT
Indeed. Think about it: Proxy wars.
We (as in "The West") are funding Ukraine vs Russia. Russia is losing, or at least bogging down, in Ukraine.
Israel is a Western proxy, so what better for Russia than to divide Western attention/funding by provoking a conflict with Israel.
Let's face it: Those dimwits in Hamas don't usually have the training or funding to pull off something on the scale that they just did.
My money's on Russia (but yeah, I dare say that Iran were in there too).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2023 21:43:34 GMT
Funny really - in Eastern Europe, Russia is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and so quite rightly we are supporting and helping Ukraine. Meanwhile in the Middle East, Israel is attempting to steal land which is not theirs, and we are helping them. Well thats not true Sid - Israel gave back Gaza 20 years ago and were not intending to go back until they came under attack. Israel has a right to defend itself. Wrong, the Gaza Strip according to Israel is an autonomous self governing part of Israel, it is not an independent state. Every day, Israeli extrimists steal land on the West Bank, they drive out Palestinians who have lived there peacefully for generations. The methods they use are threats to kill or shoot the Palestinian farmers, they take pot shots at Palestinian families on their own land, they block the water wells with rocks, they cut the electricity cables. These Israeli extremists, who are no better than Hamas, are backed and supported by Israeli soldiers The West Bank is not recognised as been part of Israel, which is why they are internationally known as "The Occupied Territories". Israel is gradually stealing land which does not belong to them, and is not part of Israel
|
|