|
|
Post by buccaneer on Sept 5, 2023 7:20:09 GMT
Oh, so calling people who view and read GBNews as "idiots" is fair is it? Ever thought to wonder why you rub people up the wrong way with your haughty communication skills, or lack of? Except if you actually understood English you'd know I didn't say all people who view and read GB News are idiots Just a lot of them are Another haughty response. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Sept 5, 2023 7:21:39 GMT
Same old attack as in my thread. You try and brush everything off by degrading people when you come up against threads/news that doesn't fit your narrow minded view of the world. When there is only one source for an assertion smart people look at who is making the assertion and whether they have any credibility The areas affected by Verhofstadt and his cronies are taxation, defence and foreign policy. As BfB states: " This proves a point made repeatedly in the 2016 referendum: EU membership comes with a constant risk of ceding more power
to Brussels". |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 5, 2023 10:18:26 GMT
Nope it never did because after 2011 any ceding of more power would require a specific referendum in the UK (not to mention several other countries also likely to reject it). As you were told at the time.
|
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Sept 5, 2023 10:20:21 GMT
What don't you understand about 'constant risk'?
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 5, 2023 10:27:42 GMT
What don't you understand about that 2011 legislation?
FWIW there's also a constant risk that the aliens from the planet Zob will land and eradicate human life. But like the risk you refer to it's even less than miniscule and no sane informed person would spend any time on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Sept 5, 2023 10:35:27 GMT
What don't you understand about that 2011 legislation? FWIW there's also a constant risk that the aliens from the planet Zob will land and eradicate human life. But like the risk you refer to it's even less than miniscule and no sane informed person would spend any time on it. You're the one calling people idiots for viewing/reading NEWS outlet you dislike. An issue you own nobody else. And whether you like it or not, a nation state is always at risk of ceding 'ever more sovereignty' to the EU. And your pathetic attempted at shoehorning aliens into the discussion along with your hauthyness epitomises why nobody can stand you. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 5, 2023 10:40:35 GMT
No I call people the promote duff stories they ought to know are sus as facts idiots
I bet you don't even know what that 2011 legislation was do you.
|
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Sept 5, 2023 10:48:04 GMT
Doesn't mean ceding more sovereignty isn't at risk though does it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 5, 2023 23:59:08 GMT
It very much did. It cut it to no risk a sane person would take seriously.
And I'm betting you still don't know what that 2011 legislation did.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 6, 2023 4:42:50 GMT
It very much did. It cut it to no risk a sane person would take seriously. And I'm betting you still don't know what that 2011 legislation did. You will think act and say what your orders are today....
EUSSR accused of introducing ‘Orwellian ministry of truth’ to tackle fake online news
The EUSSR has been accused of creating an Orwellian “Ministry of Truth” with its new plan to crack down on what it views as online “disinformation”.
Under the regulation, web bosses are expected to prioritise advice handed to them by an EUSSR-approved network of “trusted flaggers” and fact-checkers monitoring information posted online.
Cristian Terhes, a Romanian MEP, says 'surely it is for the people to hear and decide what they hold as true or desirable rather than government bodies
Cristian Terhes, a Romanian MEP, argued the bloc’s Digital Services Act (DSA) gives it sufficient powers to rule on what content it believes is and is not true when published on some of the world’s largest websites.
He told The Telegraph: “The EUSSR Commission has taken a page out of Orwell’s 1984 and demanded that EUSSR member states set up government-sponsored ministries of truth to ensure that wrong thoughts and banned words are not allowed into the digital space.
“Surely in a democratic society, it’s the public who hear or have access to all arguments, who are the ones to make up their mind on the truth or attractiveness of certain facts, ideas or parties.
“Surely it is for the people to hear and decide what they hold as true or desirable rather than government bodies.”
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 6, 2023 8:57:14 GMT
It very much did. It cut it to no risk a sane person would take seriously. And I'm betting you still don't know what that 2011 legislation did. You will think act and say what your orders are today....
Oh do get real. And I bet you don't know either what that 2011 legislation did |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 6, 2023 9:06:43 GMT
You will think act and say what your orders are today....
Oh do get real. And I bet you don't know either what that 2011 legislation did I am very real thanks for your concern. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 6, 2023 9:22:59 GMT
But clearly you don't know what that 2011 Legislation did. Well for a start it destroyed the 'oh we're going to be forced into a federal Europe' argument. Which is why some want to pretend it didn't exist
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 6, 2023 9:33:25 GMT
No I call people the promote duff stories they ought to know are sus as facts idiots I bet you don't even know what that 2011 legislation was do you. Not worth the paper it was written on? |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 6, 2023 9:48:13 GMT
No I call people the promote duff stories they ought to know are sus as facts idiots I bet you don't even know what that 2011 legislation was do you. Not worth the paper it was written on? No a post like that wouldn't be if you can't present a cogent argument to back your assertion. Can you? |
|
