|
Post by Hutchyns on Aug 22, 2023 18:20:03 GMT
oracle75
Clearly not, but if , as implied, it involves bossing people around as far as their clothing choices are concerned, then secularism isn't endearing itself to me.
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 22, 2023 18:20:30 GMT
Totes. My choice if I wear my dress 👗 to work. Not Rishi Sunak or the Conservative party.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Aug 22, 2023 18:22:14 GMT
Muddying the water as usual, he was trying to make a medical diagnosis not saying she couldn't wear a veil.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Aug 22, 2023 18:36:51 GMT
If someone puts a boot in your door and moves in, 70% of the struggle is over.
It wont be long before you wont feel at home in your own house and wont be able to arrange things in way that's comfortable for you - ie asking people to stop mumbling or speaking through a scarf.
Get the boot in the door first, then get everything laid out to your satisfaction by continual nagging, punishment etc.
The issue here is should he even be allowed to request common sense be used for a medical exam, or do third world rituals and customs take precedence? Perhaps the final struggle before you decide to move into the shed?
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 22, 2023 18:38:55 GMT
Totes. My choice if I wear my dress 👗 to work. Not Rishi Sunak or the Conservative party. Perhaps you and Hutchyns would give us the benefit of your wisdom regards this thread ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/post/135855/threadas opposed to banning a piece of clothing. I'm not holding my breath but surprise me
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 22, 2023 20:16:23 GMT
I don't believe in capital punishment. In fact I am very against it. Even for those who wear stuff I don't like.
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 22, 2023 20:39:50 GMT
I don't believe in capital punishment. In fact I am very against it. Even for those who wear stuff I don't like. Me too,and I don’t believe in capital or any punishment for those who evade a question,but do I need to spell it out for you to garner a full reply?
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Aug 22, 2023 20:50:31 GMT
@ H
The French principle of secularity is the fourth pillar of rhe French Constitution and allows the practice of equality and fraternity.
Simply put, every citizen of the state is equal in public.
That means there is the least possibility of recognising someone else as better or worse, in or out of French social position.
When many other cultures see a woman veiled, they immediately make moral judgements. Pretty soon she is a poor inferior and uneducated female, abused by the male members of her family and probably shackled to a communal bed.
That assumption is not possible when she is dressed like anyone else.
Which allows equality and fraternity. And allows a secular society where indications of religious differences do not occur publically.
If you acknowledge that you understand this, I will explain further why secularity is the best future for the human race.
In thiq case, there is no veil which prohibits a woman from being heard.
The doctor seems to be using the veil as an excuse.
Let's turn this around.If a young Prince were able to enjoy the freedom of expression you approve of, he would not be hauled across every newspaper the day after he wore a nazi uniform to a private party. Or dont your freedoms extend to everyone?
In fact the idea of "a proper way to dress" is quite British and socially conservative. Are you a secret leftie libertarian?
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 22, 2023 21:03:27 GMT
I don't believe in capital punishment. In fact I am very against it. Even for those who wear stuff I don't like. Me too,and I don’t believe in capital or any punishment for those who evade a question,but do I need to spell it out for you to garner a full reply? Apologies, you may need to as being a bit of a thicko I appear to have missed your point along the way.
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 22, 2023 21:35:23 GMT
Me too,and I don’t believe in capital or any punishment for those who evade a question,but do I need to spell it out for you to garner a full reply? Apologies, you may need to as being a bit of a thicko I appear to have missed your point along the way. Well I wouldn’t call you a thick,to the contrary you are anything but. However eliciting a reply is like pulling teeth at times. Do you think he French racist and oppressive by banning the niqab?
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 22, 2023 21:46:49 GMT
Apologies, you may need to as being a bit of a thicko I appear to have missed your point along the way. Well I wouldn’t call you a thick,to the contrary you are anything but. However eliciting a reply is like pulling teeth at times. Do you think he French racist and oppressive by banning the niqab? Racist, not directly. Oppressive, yes. I'm all in favour of tolerance towards others where it's reasonable to do so. I don't believe in capital punishment, so I show no tolerance to that. Much as I hate the niqab, I don't want to see it banned, nor the state to dictate what I wear.
|
|
|
Post by Hutchyns on Aug 22, 2023 21:47:01 GMT
Thanks for your patient explanation Oracle75.
Just a couple of observations.
If she doesn't get shackled to the bed, the French State would arrest her and lock her up for wearing the veil .... she gets treated pretty poorly by both .... the bed might even be more comfortable than the French prison cell. I can't imagine feeling very fraternal in a Country that treated people like that for the crime of wearing the 'wrong' type of clothes.
That's not how the British understand the meaning of 'allows' .... that sounds far more like forcing, insisting and dictating ...... things that wouldn't sit easily with a libertarian ...lefty or otherwise. However, even if I'm not (yet) quite convinced, I'd be genuinely interested in further studies as to why 'secularity is the best future for the human race' ..... so don't hold the rest of the class back just because one pupil has failed Part 1.
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Aug 22, 2023 22:59:11 GMT
Think of it this way. In the UK a line of people was asked to each wear what they wanted. In amongst the nudists, gunslingets, big game hunters and supercops, you form immediate assumptions about them.
But if they were all dressed alike, there are no assumptions. They are all on the same starting block.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Aug 23, 2023 19:24:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Aug 23, 2023 21:48:44 GMT
Well I wouldn’t call you a thick,to the contrary you are anything but. However eliciting a reply is like pulling teeth at times. Do you think he French racist and oppressive by banning the niqab? Racist, not directly. Oppressive, yes. I'm all in favour of tolerance towards others where it's reasonable to do so. I don't believe in capital punishment, so I show no tolerance to that. Much as I hate the niqab, I don't want to see it banned, nor the state to dictate what I wear. Even if it prevents ridicule, taunting, bullying, making assumptions, bigotry and hatred? There woumd have been lives saved in the 30's and 40's if Jews had not worn kippahs. By the way the law applies only to outside the house. There is also, for your delight, a law which prevents uncovered beachwear to be worn off the beach area. ie not in restaurants. Just a warning if you ever find yourself on a French beach. It preserves a certain modesty and standard of decency.
|
|