|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 10, 2023 7:26:49 GMT
Yesterday on this board we had members thinking that people didn't become asylum seekers until they had been granted asylum. T oday we have the myth of being required to seek asylum in first safe country.That's the problem. 100% opinion with 0% understanding. Nothing mythical about it. Aoart from your beloved EUSSR ushering this dross across their member states to be foisted onto the UK by the Frogs. What the fuck have we paid millions to t he Frogs for? Nothing to do with the EU. Like I said, you just made it up. ๐
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Aug 10, 2023 7:33:34 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 10, 2023 7:41:41 GMT
Nothing mythical about it. Aoart from your beloved EUSSR ushering this dross across their member states to be foisted onto the UK by the Frogs. What the fuck have we paid millions to t he Frogs for? Nothing to do with the EU. Like I said, you just made it up. ๐ Well whilst you say itโs nothing to do with the eu it very much is and the attitude you left so **** you,the UN convention on refugees was formulated in a different time and needs updating and if your faith revolves around the eu you may well find attitudes changing there.
|
|
|
Post by om15 on Aug 10, 2023 7:42:28 GMT
I believe that the root cause of the problem is the fact that this Country is now completely dysfunctional, particularly in the public sector, we can no longer do anything properly or in a timely way.
If those new British wading ashore were met by an official who handed them a National Insurance number, a tent and a fifty pound note and transport was available to drive them to potato picking fields, factories and the country side where they could then support themselves doing menial jobs for less than the minimum wage then everyone could be happy, the employers would have a steady supply of non unionised labour, the migrants would have the dignity of labour and the sense of belonging that paying income tax brings and we, the public, would not have to fund barges, hotels, spas or long term idleness. Possibly those intending to start a new life here might think twice if it involved having to fend for themselves on arrival.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Aug 10, 2023 8:14:53 GMT
Nothing mythical about it. Aoart from your beloved EUSSR ushering this dross across their member states to be foisted onto the UK by the Frogs. What the fuck have we paid millions to t he Frogs for? Nothing to do with the EU. Like I said, you just made it up. ๐ So who is then? The EUSSR are the ones foisting this fucking trash upon the UK. I see you chose to ignore the fact that the UK have given millions to the Frogs to stop this EUSSR revenge on the UK.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 8:53:17 GMT
Nothing to do with the EU. Like I said, you just made it up. ๐ So who is then? The EUSSR are the ones foisting this fucking trash upon the UK. I see you chose to ignore the fact that the UK have given millions to the Frogs to stop this EUSSR revenge on the UK. 'Revenge', they are glad to be shut of us.๐ We do give millions to the French to boost their border force at the coast but the French coastline is over 2000 miles long. We would be better building facilities to process claims in France but we will not do that. Almost like we don't want to stop the boats, surely that can't be true, can it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 8:54:14 GMT
Nothing to do with the EU. Like I said, you just made it up. ๐ So who is then? The EUSSR are the ones foisting this fucking trash upon the UK. I see you chose to ignore the fact that the UK have given millions to the Frogs to stop this EUSSR revenge on the UK. Do you have any mirrors?
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 10, 2023 8:55:14 GMT
Nothing to do with the EU. Like I said, you just made it up. ๐ So who is then? The EUSSR are the ones foisting this fucking trash upon the UK. I see you chose to ignore the fact that the UK have given millions to the Frogs to stop this EUSSR revenge on the UK. I haven't "chosen to ignore" anything. I never mentioned it. What I did mention was your erroneous statement that asylum seekers are required to claim asylum in the first safe country. That's not true. So either you made it up or you are lying. I gave you the benefit of the doubt and said you made it up.
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 10, 2023 8:59:12 GMT
So who is then? The EUSSR are the ones foisting this fucking trash upon the UK. I see you chose to ignore the fact that the UK have given millions to the Frogs to stop this EUSSR revenge on the UK. I haven't "chosen to ignore" anything. I never mentioned it. What I did mention was your erroneous statement that asylum seekers are required to claim asylum in the first safe country. That's not true. So either you made it up or you are lying. I gave you the benefit of the doubt and said you made it up. I gave you the benefit of the doubt since you didnโt reply so Iโll ask again do you believe the UN convention on refugees needs an overhaul?
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Aug 10, 2023 9:05:06 GMT
So who is then? The EUSSR are the ones foisting this fucking trash upon the UK. I see you chose to ignore the fact that the UK have given millions to the Frogs to stop this EUSSR revenge on the UK. I haven't "chosen to ignore" anything. I never mentioned it. What I did mention was your erroneous statement that asylum seekers are required to claim asylum in the first safe country. That's not true. So either you made it up or you are lying. I gave you the benefit of the doubt and said you made it up. Nothing erroneous about it as you full well know. Unlike the usuals I have the truth on my side.
|
|
|
Post by dappy on Aug 10, 2023 10:23:40 GMT
I haven't "chosen to ignore" anything. I never mentioned it. What I did mention was your erroneous statement that asylum seekers are required to claim asylum in the first safe country. That's not true. So either you made it up or you are lying. I gave you the benefit of the doubt and said you made it up. I gave you the benefit of the doubt since you didnโt reply so Iโll ask again do you believe the UN convention on refugees needs an overhaul? What would you want any overhaul to say?
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 10, 2023 10:27:42 GMT
I haven't "chosen to ignore" anything. I never mentioned it. What I did mention was your erroneous statement that asylum seekers are required to claim asylum in the first safe country. That's not true. So either you made it up or you are lying. I gave you the benefit of the doubt and said you made it up. Nothing erroneous about it as you full well know. Unlike the usuals I have the truth on my side. you know when you're on the winning side when Dippy, andrew redrum and zany disagree with you.
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 10, 2023 10:30:02 GMT
I haven't "chosen to ignore" anything. I never mentioned it. What I did mention was your erroneous statement that asylum seekers are required to claim asylum in the first safe country. That's not true. So either you made it up or you are lying. I gave you the benefit of the doubt and said you made it up. I gave you the benefit of the doubt since you didnโt reply so Iโll ask again do you believe the UN convention on refugees needs an overhaul? Sorry, I missed your question, although I have answered this to Red Rackham when he asked me. Yes, the convention probably needs revisiting as the world has changed. As to how it needs to be reworked, I don't have enough info to have an opinion.
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 10, 2023 10:31:14 GMT
Nothing erroneous about it as you full well know. Unlike the usuals I have the truth on my side. you know when you're on the winning side when Dippy, andrew redrum and zany disagree with you. A 30 second Google search would tell jonksy whether he is accurate or not. The truth is he can't be bothered.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Aug 10, 2023 10:32:00 GMT
Nothing erroneous about it as you full well know. Unlike the usuals I have the truth on my side. you know when you're on the winning side when Dippy, andrew redrum and zany disagree with you. Don't we just mate...
|
|