|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jun 25, 2023 7:19:26 GMT
If the Asylum Bill does not get through Parliament and the Rwanda scheme fails to get off the ground then the cost of housing asylum seekers projected to reach £11 Billion a year. But that is not the worst of it - as Labour are expected to win next years election and they have already said they will not implement the Rwanda scheme and increase the numbers of Asylum seekers the bill will go even higher...  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2023 7:29:15 GMT
If the Asylum Bill does not get through Parliament and the Rwanda scheme fails to get off the ground then the cost of housing asylum seekers projected to reach £11 Billion a year. But that is not the worst of it - as Labour are expected to win next years election and they have already said they will not implement the Rwanda scheme and increase the numbers of Asylum seekers the bill will go even higher... That is assuming that Labour will deal with asylum seekers as the Tories are. If Labour begin processing the asylum seekers in good order they can look for work and contribute to the economy. Those that fail the process can be sent home, legally. Win win all round. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Jun 25, 2023 8:10:23 GMT
If the Asylum Bill does not get through Parliament and the Rwanda scheme fails to get off the ground then the cost of housing asylum seekers projected to reach £11 Billion a year. But that is not the worst of it - as Labour are expected to win next years election and they have already said they will not implement the Rwanda scheme and increase the numbers of Asylum seekers the bill will go even higher... That is assuming that Labour will deal with asylum seekers as the Tories are. If Labour begin processing the asylum seekers in good order they can look for work and contribute to the economy. Those that fail the process can be sent home, legally. Win win all round. We don't need them! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2023 8:17:07 GMT
That is assuming that Labour will deal with asylum seekers as the Tories are. If Labour begin processing the asylum seekers in good order they can look for work and contribute to the economy. Those that fail the process can be sent home, legally. Win win all round. We don't need them! We, as a country, have always needed migrant workers. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jun 25, 2023 8:23:14 GMT
If the Asylum Bill does not get through Parliament and the Rwanda scheme fails to get off the ground then the cost of housing asylum seekers projected to reach £11 Billion a year. But that is not the worst of it - as Labour are expected to win next years election and they have already said they will not implement the Rwanda scheme and increase the numbers of Asylum seekers the bill will go even higher... That is assuming that Labour will deal with asylum seekers as the Tories are. If Labour begin processing the asylum seekers in good order they can look for work and contribute to the economy. Those that fail the process can be sent home, legally. Win win all round. Which will massively increase the incentives for the flows of irregular people . My prediction is your determination to use these people to perform vindictive, underhand assaults on the community you live in will get noticed by the community you live in |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jun 25, 2023 8:27:50 GMT
We, as a country, have always needed migrant workers. We have migrant workers without unofficially dissolving our borders - your argument is vacuous and clearly opportunist / motivated. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2023 8:42:26 GMT
That is assuming that Labour will deal with asylum seekers as the Tories are. If Labour begin processing the asylum seekers in good order they can look for work and contribute to the economy. Those that fail the process can be sent home, legally. Win win all round. Which will massively increase the incentives for the flows of irregular people . My prediction is your determination to use these people to perform vindictive, underhand assaults on the community you live in will get noticed by the community you live in What are you talking about?? I merely stated the fact that we have always 'needed' migrant workers. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 25, 2023 8:44:45 GMT
Which will massively increase the incentives for the flows of irregular people . My prediction is your determination to use these people to perform vindictive, underhand assaults on the community you live in will get noticed by the community you live in What are you talking about?? I merely stated the fact that we have always 'needed' migrant workers. For what wonky? |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jun 25, 2023 8:48:42 GMT
Which will massively increase the incentives for the flows of irregular people . My prediction is your determination to use these people to perform vindictive, underhand assaults on the community you live in will get noticed by the community you live in What are you talking about?? I merely stated the fact that we have always 'needed' migrant workers. What's that got to do with it - we have migrants now? Certainly there is no precedent in recent history for unofficially dissolving our borders to perform an underhand assult on the residents - which is what you advocate. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2023 8:52:58 GMT
What are you talking about?? I merely stated the fact that we have always 'needed' migrant workers. For what wonky? Fruit picking. Carer staff. Doctors. Nurses. Ancillary staff. Teachers. Railway workers. Bus conductors.🤣 Barristers. Lawyers. Jury duty. Gardeners. Office staff. Electrician. Sailors. Sewage workers. Bar work. Waters. Waitresses. Hair dressers. Pot hole fixers. Builders. Taxi drivers. .................. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2023 8:55:09 GMT
What are you talking about?? I merely stated the fact that we have always 'needed' migrant workers. What's that got to do with it - we have migrants now? Certainly there is no precedent in recent history for unofficially dissolving our borders to perform an underhand assult on the residents - which is what you advocate. I was responding to the thread, you are going into never never land with your 'dissolving' borders and assaults. I have never said migrants should assault residents of this country. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jun 25, 2023 8:56:05 GMT
Fruit picking. Carer staff. Doctors. Nurses. Ancillary staff. Teachers. Railway workers. Bus conductors.🤣 Barristers. Lawyers. Jury duty. Gardeners. Office staff. Electrician. Sailors. Sewage workers. Bar work. Waters. Waitresses. Hair dressers. Pot hole fixers. Builders. Taxi drivers. .................. There are now approaching 80 million people on a small island with most of the packed into one comer. Your claim of it 'needing' yet more people is patent nonsense. You, of course, also know it is nonsense. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2023 9:09:17 GMT
Fruit picking. Carer staff. Doctors. Nurses. Ancillary staff. Teachers. Railway workers. Bus conductors.🤣 Barristers. Lawyers. Jury duty. Gardeners. Office staff. Electrician. Sailors. Sewage workers. Bar work. Waters. Waitresses. Hair dressers. Pot hole fixers. Builders. Taxi drivers. .................. There are now approaching 80 million people on a small island with most of the packed into one comer. Your claim of it 'needing' yet more people is patent nonsense. You, of course, also know it is nonsense. "Up to 1.3 million people born abroad left the UK between the third quarter of 2019 and the same period in 2020, according to a blog published earlier this month by the government-funded Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence. In London alone almost 700,000 residents born overseas have probably moved out. The exodus constitutes the largest drop in population in the UK since the Second World War. Coronavirus is largely to blame. Many migrants work in the hardest-hit sectors, such as travel and hospitality, and have sadly lost their jobs and returned to their home countries and families. It is unknown how many will return. If they do, they find themselves subject to much stricter immigration rules as, from 1 January, free movement of people ended. Many of those formerly in jobs classed as unskilled will no longer qualify for work visas. Indeed, Brexit is also a factor in the migrant exodus. During the whole Brexit period, immigration proved to be the most hotly debated subject and, for many voters, it was the reason they voted to leave. The debate was divisive and often inflammatory. Migrants felt unwelcome. The legacy is a reduction in the UK migrant workforce at a time when the country needs them most". CIPD. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 25, 2023 9:31:30 GMT
Fruit picking. Carer staff. Doctors. Nurses. Ancillary staff. Teachers. Railway workers. Bus conductors.🤣 Barristers. Lawyers. Jury duty. Gardeners. Office staff. Electrician. Sailors. Sewage workers. Bar work. Waters. Waitresses. Hair dressers. Pot hole fixers. Builders. Taxi drivers. .................. you idiot, are you honestly telling us that these 'young Albanian men' have arrived illegally by dinghy, and intend to work ..
hahahahahahah
They have NO intentions of doing a hard days graft, they'll either make their money by crime, or knock-up some daft tart and have a load of kids with her, you really are a utter lefty nitwit.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jun 25, 2023 9:43:54 GMT
If the Asylum Bill does not get through Parliament and the Rwanda scheme fails to get off the ground then the cost of housing asylum seekers projected to reach £11 Billion a year. But that is not the worst of it - as Labour are expected to win next years election and they have already said they will not implement the Rwanda scheme and increase the numbers of Asylum seekers the bill will go even higher... So why don't the government want to get a move on to sort the claims quicker, that seems the obvious way to reduce costs. It's almost as though they are not doing that deliberately as a dead cat to distract from other issues. The replies on this thread indicate the success with a certain demographic. |
|
