|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 25, 2023 18:33:49 GMT
When do any of these virtual signallers ever take any of these unwanted fuckers in? I wonder how many hash.c2, darling, wonky and fiddles have under their roof? Exactly, the virtue signallers, it makes me want to howl with laughter, just look at the areas who are kicking up the most fuss about any plans to house asylum seekers anywhere in their area, Wales who's leader is that dickhead Drakeford, talking shit giving asylum seekers £1,600 a month for doing fuck all.
The usual lefty loony hypocrites.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2023 6:10:12 GMT
The loonyies are on form today.🤣
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jun 26, 2023 6:42:35 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Jun 26, 2023 6:47:27 GMT
Oh no wrong answer sheepy lad, they want them to work so they can say they are useful additions, rather than freeloaders and piss takers, who knew?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jun 26, 2023 6:52:10 GMT
I have no particular objection to them working, but given their skill set I do wonder how many would be able to earn enough to pay their own hotel bills..
I suspect most of them will be on minimum wage.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 26, 2023 6:55:09 GMT
You get suckered everytime don't you hash? |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jun 26, 2023 7:02:10 GMT
And... more name calling without making a serious point.
Thanks for your useful as ever contribution to the debate.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Jun 26, 2023 7:06:34 GMT
I have no particular objection to them working, but given their skill set I do wonder how many would be able to earn enough to pay their own hotel bills.. I suspect most of them will be on minimum wage. I suspect it doesn't in anyway stop the situation but make it worse, while how many jobs can you give mass unskilled immigration, which actually makes the UK less progressive trying to make up for the constant skill shortage as well as creating other crisis like housing shortages and over worked infrastructure etc, which we already suffer the consequences of. Whoever comes up with this shit doesn't have an idea of how the future will play out and is thinking up ways for a sticking plaster. Which will just become somebody else's problem down the line. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 26, 2023 7:11:27 GMT
And... more name calling without making a serious point. Thanks for your useful as ever contribution to the debate. The point is hash the usual lefty virtual signallers like you can then state they are doing something useful to earn their keep. You can bet they would only have a skill-set that at best would bring them in the minimum wage. Is that a serious enough point for you hash? |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Jun 26, 2023 7:12:47 GMT
And... more name calling without making a serious point. Thanks for your useful as ever contribution to the debate. I think Jonksy is trying to say that give them a job and they have a foot in the door that you'll never shift. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jun 26, 2023 7:17:45 GMT
And... more name calling without making a serious point. Thanks for your useful as ever contribution to the debate. A point was made by Sheepy. Of course it is relatively advantageous for some of them to work vs none of them to work , given a fixed quantity. However, the key assumption here is 'a fixed quantity'.
The left have a bit of a blind spot when it comes to incentives, but i didn't think that's what is happening here. Andrew knows perfectly well what the problem is. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Jun 26, 2023 7:23:46 GMT
And... more name calling without making a serious point. Thanks for your useful as ever contribution to the debate. A point was made by Sheepy. Of course it is relatively advantageous for some of them to work vs none of them to work , given a fixed quantity. However, the key assumption here is 'a fixed quantity'.
The left have a bit of a blind spot when it comes to incentives, but i didn't think that's what is happening here. Andrew knows perfectly well what the problem is. In all honesty, they couldn't take the point if you paid them, they have already created the crisis and can only come up with ways to virtue signal without any idea of the problems they are creating further down the line. Complete madness has no cure. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 26, 2023 8:01:52 GMT
A point was made by Sheepy. Of course it is relatively advantageous for some of them to work vs none of them to work , given a fixed quantity. However, the key assumption here is 'a fixed quantity'.
The left have a bit of a blind spot when it comes to incentives, but i didn't think that's what is happening here. Andrew knows perfectly well what the problem is. In all honesty, they couldn't take the point if you paid them, they have already created the crisis and can only come up with ways to virtue signal without any idea of the problems they are creating further down the line. Complete madness has no cure. How anyone can be fooled by an effort that it would add 1.6 billion to gdp would offset the multi billions this farce cost the UK each year I suppose it may cover the cost of the HR parasites and that's if we are lucky. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 26, 2023 8:05:52 GMT
And... more name calling without making a serious point. Thanks for your useful as ever contribution to the debate. The point is hash the usual lefty virtual signallers like you can then state they are doing something useful to earn their keep. You can bet they would only have a skill-set that at best would bring them in the minimum wage. Is that a serious enough point for you hash? The lefties know full well these young illegal Albanian migrants have no intentions whatsoever in find work, that's why they've fled their own country, in Albania if you don't work you don't get any money, you starve and on the streets, no handouts in Albania for the lazy workshy.
They are here for the Free ride, Free houses, Free NHS, Free benefits, why would they want to go back to Albania, the lefties know exactly what they are here for, then come up with stuff like andrew comes out with, you can only conclude they are either gullible as the days long, or just being a typical lefty virtue signaller.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 26, 2023 13:00:20 GMT
I cant help noticing that Prince William has launched a plan to end homelessness within five years. He says "homelessness should not exist in a modern and progressive society". Very laudable I'm sure. As I listened to this virtue signalling nonsense, and that is exactly what it is, I thought to myself how on earth can homelessness be addressed when there are hundreds of thousands of illegals crossing the channel who get priority over housing which ensures our own homeless stay on the streets.
Asylum costs of £11 billion a year are a disgrace, it's a slap in the face to everyone in this country especially the homeless and those who are struggling with the cost of living. If Prince William is serious about ending homelessness he should focus on stopping illegals crossing the channel. This latest royal initiative should be subtitled 'keeping the royals in the public eye', because that's what it's really about.
|
|
