Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 8:32:53 GMT
Imagine, just for a second the furore if "channel migrants" had been replaced by "Jews". The language of pre war Germany is alive and well in England. That's exactly what the muslims rely on to shut down any debate about muslims and Islam. They invoke the comparison with Hitler's treatment of Jews. But it's a completely different thing. The problem with muslims is their culture and the toxic ideas spread by the koran - which has led to the rise of closed communities of muslims who try to enforce their ideas on everybody else. Look what happens to anyone who criticises the religion of Islam or desecrates a copy of the koran. Jew hating is pure "racism". And Muslim hating isn't? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 8:34:33 GMT
By the media, by the Establishment, by politicians and uncle Tom cobbly and all. As a populist I have always believed in your right to opinion and if you cannot answer that right if its bollox with an answer which is common sense then bigger fool you. You have accepted that you need to be controlled. What has that got to do with my point that language used about one set of people is acceptable but if used against another set of people it would be deemed racist? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 8:48:35 GMT
That's exactly what the muslims rely on to shut down any debate about muslims and Islam. They invoke the comparison with Hitler's treatment of Jews. But it's a completely different thing. The problem with muslims is their culture and the toxic ideas spread by the koran - which has led to the rise of closed communities of muslims who try to enforce their ideas on everybody else. Look what happens to anyone who criticises the religion of Islam or desecrates a copy of the koran. Jew hating is pure "racism". And Muslim hating isn't? Correct, but then again, he isn't hating Muslims, merely offering his opinion on how they shut down debate. He could have used the same argument about Christians or Hindus if they were applicable. Your beloved racist Dianne Abbott never addressed Judaism, so your phony religious claim is basically nonsense. She was referring to them as a group - a racial group under US law. It's strange that you object considering Labour pushed so many draconian laws to counter speech, but like I hinted at before the hypocrisy from the left is extreme. They're certainly not the people you want overseeing the channel migrant crisis (the topic).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 8:53:27 GMT
By the media, by the Establishment, by politicians and uncle Tom cobbly and all. As a populist I have always believed in your right to opinion and if you cannot answer that right if its bollox with an answer which is common sense then bigger fool you. You have accepted that you need to be controlled. What has that got to do with my point that language used about one set of people is acceptable but if used against another set of people it would be deemed racist? What set of people and what does this have to do with the topic? It isn't our fault racists in Labour were hoist by their own petard.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 9:16:58 GMT
Correct, but then again, he isn't hating Muslims, merely offering his opinion on how they shut down debate. He could have used the same argument about Christians or Hindus if they were applicable. Your beloved racist Dianne Abbott never addressed Judaism, so your phony religious claim is basically nonsense. She was referring to them as a group - a racial group under US law. It's strange that you object considering Labour pushed so many draconian laws to counter speech, but like I hinted at before the hypocrisy from the left is extreme. They're certainly not the people you want overseeing the channel migrant crisis (the topic).
You cannot see a point when it's poked in your eye.😂 Do you not understand that it makes you look like a racist if you believe abusing one section of people is permittable whilst doing exactly the same thing to another is not. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 9:18:35 GMT
What has that got to do with my point that language used about one set of people is acceptable but if used against another set of people it would be deemed racist? What set of people and what does this have to do with the topic? It isn't our fault racists in Labour were hoist by their own petard.
Jenrick is a Tory. It's simple, if Jenrick had used the same language about jews he would have been outed as an anti-Semite. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Apr 27, 2023 9:19:23 GMT
Correct, but then again, he isn't hating Muslims, merely offering his opinion on how they shut down debate. He could have used the same argument about Christians or Hindus if they were applicable. Your beloved racist Dianne Abbott never addressed Judaism, so your phony religious claim is basically nonsense. She was referring to them as a group - a racial group under US law. It's strange that you object considering Labour pushed so many draconian laws to counter speech, but like I hinted at before the hypocrisy from the left is extreme. They're certainly not the people you want overseeing the channel migrant crisis (the topic).
You cannot see a point when it's poked in your eye.😂 Do you not understand that it makes you look like a racist if you believe abusing one section of people is permittable whilst doing exactly the same thing to another is not. What section of people is being abused? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 9:21:05 GMT
Correct, but then again, he isn't hating Muslims, merely offering his opinion on how they shut down debate. He could have used the same argument about Christians or Hindus if they were applicable. Your beloved racist Dianne Abbott never addressed Judaism, so your phony religious claim is basically nonsense. She was referring to them as a group - a racial group under US law. It's strange that you object considering Labour pushed so many draconian laws to counter speech, but like I hinted at before the hypocrisy from the left is extreme. They're certainly not the people you want overseeing the channel migrant crisis (the topic).
You cannot see a point when it's poked in your eye.😂 Do you not understand that it makes you look like a racist if you believe abusing one section of people is permittable whilst doing exactly the same thing to another is not. In your eyes, but then you're not making any sense, and that's because you're not meant to, considering you're trolling the thread. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 9:26:05 GMT
What set of people and what does this have to do with the topic? It isn't our fault racists in Labour were hoist by their own petard.
Jenrick is a Tory. It's simple, if Jenrick had used the same language about jews he would have been outed as an anti-Semite. As far as I can tell it's the English language directed at nobody in particular. YOu object to the people of this country being heard, because you support no restrictions to the number of people who come here, whilst crying because the public institutions are at breaking point. The fact that you have repetitively derailed this thread over something that happened to Abbott highlights your trolling. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 9:29:08 GMT
You are seriously saying that migrants are not people? The immigration minister told the audience: “Put simply, excessive, uncontrolled migration threatens to cannibalise that compassion that marks out the British people.” Well let us put it this way. "The once fortnightly flood of football supporters into the town brings with it drunkenness and crime and affects the peaceful lives of the residents with people urinating in gardens and crowds walking in the roads disrupting traffic movement" That sentence is not saying the football crowd is not human but the effect of any large crowd on an area has many negative aspects. Recognising that fact is very important and the people of the UK are, strange as it may seem, more important than people entering illegally and if the numbers entering illegally are causing problems for the British people, and there is no doubt they are, then t he British people's wishes and concerns should take centre stage. You would have thought. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 9:52:41 GMT
Racist is a word easily employed by the open borders faction.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 13:01:57 GMT
You cannot see a point when it's poked in your eye.😂 Do you not understand that it makes you look like a racist if you believe abusing one section of people is permittable whilst doing exactly the same thing to another is not. What section of people is being abused? What group of people is the topic discussing? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 13:02:39 GMT
You cannot see a point when it's poked in your eye.😂 Do you not understand that it makes you look like a racist if you believe abusing one section of people is permittable whilst doing exactly the same thing to another is not. In your eyes, but then you're not making any sense, and that's because you're not meant to, considering you're trolling the thread. If I am wrong please explain. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 13:05:52 GMT
Jenrick is a Tory. It's simple, if Jenrick had used the same language about jews he would have been outed as an anti-Semite. As far as I can tell it's the English language directed at nobody in particular. YOu object to the people of this country being heard, because you support no restrictions to the number of people who come here, whilst crying because the public institutions are at breaking point. The fact that you have repetitively derailed this thread over something that happened to Abbott highlights your trolling. But you of course are wrong. I do not support no limits on immigration but rather a fair system that takes in the needs of some of the most vulnerable people in the world. What I can't understand is why you don't. My comment about Abbott is pertinent as to the double standards at play. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2023 13:07:41 GMT
Racist is a word easily employed by the open borders faction. That's because people crossing borders are usually foreign and it's how we treat different groups of people. |
|
