|
Post by buccaneer on Mar 31, 2023 7:12:58 GMT
The world over, the EU is the odd one out focusing on regulatory harmonisation rather than maximising regulatory competition. By all accounts, the UK is leaving behind the EU and moving forward to a liberalising region of trade in the Pacific. Trade expert Shanker Singham (rightly or wrongly) believes this will finish off any hopes of those hellbent on subjugating the UK back under EU control. For that alone, it's tempting. He states: www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/03/29/cptpp-uk-pacific-trade-deal-brexit-victory-analysis/Remainers hate and mock the idea of a global Britain, so it's worth reminding them from none other than David Frost: www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/03/29/cptpp-uk-pacific-trade-deal-brexit-victory-analysis/Watch out for scare stories about accession to the CPTPP in the coming months. Life wouldn't be the same without our remnants and their customary forecasts of doom and gloom. The devil will be in the detail, but national sovereignty and free trade is much preferable than the EU's model. Hopefully, we can wave goodbye to the EU for good.
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Mar 31, 2023 10:22:44 GMT
I for one dont care because it wont make an iota of difference to the UK. I AM surprised that after all the wails of non democratic representation in the EU, the UK is trying to celebrate joining a group of countries which has zero democratic structure and hugely weighted to Pacific Rim interests.
Without a referendum. Or indeed almost no public education or explanation or knowledge about what this is.
Still, memories are short. There is no practical benefit to this group no one can remember the name of, but the political benefits for the Brexit government are touted with no chance of counter argument. How convenient that once again they will be promising wonderful things and Joe Average will have no voice or choice.
Enjoy your palm oil and try not to think of a world without orangutangs. And all that pollution from long range transport. I was under the impression the UK was interested in reducing emissions.
To be honest my ideal would be a world with free trade, just on guard against poor quality, smuggling and phytosanitary controls. I note there is nothing in this CPTTPCTCP thing ( reads like a genetic code) that says anything about those things. Nor do we know what the unelected controlling group will decide.
So we will just have to rely on the Tories knowing what they are doing.
LOLOLOLOL
By the way Bucky, a country can be a member of any number of trade organisations. This is not an either/or issue. So much for knowing what you are talking about.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 31, 2023 10:50:00 GMT
"By the way Bucky, a country can be a member of any number of trade organisations. This is not an either/or issue."
Well you cannot be a member of both the Single Market and the CPTPP - in that case it really is an either/or issue.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2023 10:58:52 GMT
£1.8B extra income once up and running for 10 years would help recuperate the 15-year-£33B Brexit loss! Yay. But it's a start, isn't it? Here's something just as interesting: looks like the deal allows multinational companies to sue the government -- our government -- for introducing policies that threaten their profits. So, we seem to be back to square one, required to play on a level playing field. This time around, though, CEOs of multinationals will tell us how to level the playing field. Yay. Follow the rules or else, we will have to appear in court somewhere in the Pacific? --------------------------------- www.msn.com/en-gb/money/news/uk-joins-asia-pacific-cptpp-trade-bloc-that-includes-japan-and-australia/ar-AA19hU7D?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=e345a727d7e54591a63d4e24b08d453b&ei=12Britain has joined the 11-member strong Asia-Pacific trade bloc that includes Japan and Australia after nearly two years of negotiations. The deal, part of a push to agree worldwide trade deals after Brexit, secures access for British exporters to 500 million people in the 11-member Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
Spanning Canada, Mexico, Japan, Australia, Vietnam and Malaysia, the CPTPP is expected to be ratified by the UK parliament and those of the other 11 member states later this year.
The government said the deal, which will cut tariffs on exports of food, drink and cars, would generate £1.8bn of extra income once it had been up and running for 10 years, which is about 0.08% of the UK’s annual gross national product (GDP).
Unions condemned clauses in the deal that will allow large companies to sue the UK government behind closed doors if they believe their profits have suffered from changes to laws or regulations. The TUC’s general secretary, Paul Nowak, said: “This deal allows multinational corporations to sue the UK government in secret courts for introducing policies which threaten their profits – this could include an increase in the minimum wage or bringing energy companies back into public ownership.”
Nowak said the deal would sanction the exploitation of workers in Vietnam and Brunei “where independent unions are banned, and Malaysia where migrant workers are subject to forced labour”.
China, which applied to become a member in 2021, several months after the UK, is likely to face significant pushback from members, including the UK, that will argue Beijing should be blocked unless it complies with existing international trade rules.
Some trade experts said joining the CPTPP bloc would harm the UK’s ability to rejoin the EU at a later date, arguing that harmonising trade rules with the CPTPP countries would drive a wedge between Brussels and London. Sam Lowe, a trade expert at the advisory firm Flint Global, said: “CPTPP membership does make it more difficult for UK to rejoin EU customs union. But, given the UK will seemingly join without significant changes to EU-inherited regulations, it also demonstrates that EU and CPTPP regulatory approaches are compatible.”
The UK has bilateral deals with many of the countries inside the bloc, including Australia, New Zealand and Japan, minimising the benefit of the overarching agreement. However, ministers expect the deal to become increasingly important as the trade bloc, which will boast a GDP of $11tn, offers access to more nations.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Mar 31, 2023 11:03:16 GMT
The world over, the EU is the odd one out focusing on regulatory harmonisation rather than maximising regulatory competition. By all accounts, the UK is leaving behind the EU and moving forward to a liberalising region of trade in the Pacific. Trade expert Shanker Singham (rightly or wrongly) believes this will finish off any hopes of those hellbent on subjugating the UK back under EU control. For that alone, it's tempting. He states: www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/03/29/cptpp-uk-pacific-trade-deal-brexit-victory-analysis/Remainers hate and mock the idea of a global Britain, so it's worth reminding them from none other than David Frost: www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/03/29/cptpp-uk-pacific-trade-deal-brexit-victory-analysis/Watch out for scare stories about accession to the CPTPP in the coming months. Life wouldn't be the same without our remnants and their customary forecasts of doom and gloom. The devil will be in the detail, but national sovereignty and free trade is much preferable than the EU's model. Hopefully, we can wave goodbye to the EU for good. One of the big problems with the EU was businesses dumping us for cheaper labour and cheaper taxes. In this respect CPTPP could have the same problem. As you say, the devil is in the detail. But definitely worth looking at. If we join CPTPP, it should be by democratic vote.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Mar 31, 2023 11:10:48 GMT
Any member of trade organisations except the EU's outdated, solemn model you mean, Oray.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Mar 31, 2023 11:14:57 GMT
£1.8B extra income once up and running for 10 years would help recuperate the 15-year-£33B Brexit loss! Yay. But it's a start, isn't it? Here's something just as interesting: looks like the deal allows multinational companies to sue the government -- our government -- for introducing policies that threaten their profits. So, we seem to be back to square one, required to play on a level playing field. This time around, though, CEOs of multinationals will tell us how to level the playing field. Yay. Follow the rules or else, we will have to appear in court somewhere in the Pacific? --------------------------------- www.msn.com/en-gb/money/news/uk-joins-asia-pacific-cptpp-trade-bloc-that-includes-japan-and-australia/ar-AA19hU7D?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=e345a727d7e54591a63d4e24b08d453b&ei=12Britain has joined the 11-member strong Asia-Pacific trade bloc that includes Japan and Australia after nearly two years of negotiations. The deal, part of a push to agree worldwide trade deals after Brexit, secures access for British exporters to 500 million people in the 11-member Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
Spanning Canada, Mexico, Japan, Australia, Vietnam and Malaysia, the CPTPP is expected to be ratified by the UK parliament and those of the other 11 member states later this year.
The government said the deal, which will cut tariffs on exports of food, drink and cars, would generate £1.8bn of extra income once it had been up and running for 10 years, which is about 0.08% of the UK’s annual gross national product (GDP).
Unions condemned clauses in the deal that will allow large companies to sue the UK government behind closed doors if they believe their profits have suffered from changes to laws or regulations. The TUC’s general secretary, Paul Nowak, said: “This deal allows multinational corporations to sue the UK government in secret courts for introducing policies which threaten their profits – this could include an increase in the minimum wage or bringing energy companies back into public ownership.”
Nowak said the deal would sanction the exploitation of workers in Vietnam and Brunei “where independent unions are banned, and Malaysia where migrant workers are subject to forced labour”.
China, which applied to become a member in 2021, several months after the UK, is likely to face significant pushback from members, including the UK, that will argue Beijing should be blocked unless it complies with existing international trade rules.
Some trade experts said joining the CPTPP bloc would harm the UK’s ability to rejoin the EU at a later date, arguing that harmonising trade rules with the CPTPP countries would drive a wedge between Brussels and London. Sam Lowe, a trade expert at the advisory firm Flint Global, said: “CPTPP membership does make it more difficult for UK to rejoin EU customs union. But, given the UK will seemingly join without significant changes to EU-inherited regulations, it also demonstrates that EU and CPTPP regulatory approaches are compatible.”
The UK has bilateral deals with many of the countries inside the bloc, including Australia, New Zealand and Japan, minimising the benefit of the overarching agreement. However, ministers expect the deal to become increasingly important as the trade bloc, which will boast a GDP of $11tn, offers access to more nations.
Nuff said.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2023 11:37:22 GMT
£1.8B extra income once up and running for 10 years would help recuperate the 15-year-£33B Brexit loss! Yay. But it's a start, isn't it? Here's something just as interesting: looks like the deal allows multinational companies to sue the government -- our government -- for introducing policies that threaten their profits. So, we seem to be back to square one, required to play on a level playing field. This time around, though, CEOs of multinationals will tell us how to level the playing field. Yay. Follow the rules or else, we will have to appear in court somewhere in the Pacific? --------------------------------- www.msn.com/en-gb/money/news/uk-joins-asia-pacific-cptpp-trade-bloc-that-includes-japan-and-australia/ar-AA19hU7D?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=e345a727d7e54591a63d4e24b08d453b&ei=12Britain has joined the 11-member strong Asia-Pacific trade bloc that includes Japan and Australia after nearly two years of negotiations. The deal, part of a push to agree worldwide trade deals after Brexit, secures access for British exporters to 500 million people in the 11-member Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
Spanning Canada, Mexico, Japan, Australia, Vietnam and Malaysia, the CPTPP is expected to be ratified by the UK parliament and those of the other 11 member states later this year.
The government said the deal, which will cut tariffs on exports of food, drink and cars, would generate £1.8bn of extra income once it had been up and running for 10 years, which is about 0.08% of the UK’s annual gross national product (GDP).
Unions condemned clauses in the deal that will allow large companies to sue the UK government behind closed doors if they believe their profits have suffered from changes to laws or regulations. The TUC’s general secretary, Paul Nowak, said: “This deal allows multinational corporations to sue the UK government in secret courts for introducing policies which threaten their profits – this could include an increase in the minimum wage or bringing energy companies back into public ownership.”
Nowak said the deal would sanction the exploitation of workers in Vietnam and Brunei “where independent unions are banned, and Malaysia where migrant workers are subject to forced labour”.
China, which applied to become a member in 2021, several months after the UK, is likely to face significant pushback from members, including the UK, that will argue Beijing should be blocked unless it complies with existing international trade rules.
Some trade experts said joining the CPTPP bloc would harm the UK’s ability to rejoin the EU at a later date, arguing that harmonising trade rules with the CPTPP countries would drive a wedge between Brussels and London. Sam Lowe, a trade expert at the advisory firm Flint Global, said: “CPTPP membership does make it more difficult for UK to rejoin EU customs union. But, given the UK will seemingly join without significant changes to EU-inherited regulations, it also demonstrates that EU and CPTPP regulatory approaches are compatible.”
The UK has bilateral deals with many of the countries inside the bloc, including Australia, New Zealand and Japan, minimising the benefit of the overarching agreement. However, ministers expect the deal to become increasingly important as the trade bloc, which will boast a GDP of $11tn, offers access to more nations.
Nuff said. Ah, No. Reiterating your non-argument doesn't cut it. "Nuff said" is not enough -- that is, if you want an intelligent discussion about your own post. You have to clarify your position. So. Do you or do you not agree that the CPTPP rules on fair competition (as gleaned from the article, of course) are no different from the EU level-playing-field rules?
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Apr 1, 2023 5:41:30 GMT
Ah, No. Reiterating your non-argument doesn't cut it. "Nuff said" is not enough -- that is, if you want an intelligent discussion about your own post. You have to clarify your position. So. Do you or do you not agree that the CPTPP rules on fair competition (as gleaned from the article, of course) are no different from the EU level-playing-field rules?No. They are different. The EU has limited provisions in its so-called 'level playing field' with Canada and Japan; it singled the UK out for more constraining treatment when it came to a FTA. But at least with the CPTPP (like all other trade deals around the world except the EU of course), allows the UK to focus on free trade while keeping its national sovereignty. Great eh?
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 1, 2023 6:02:51 GMT
Ah, No. Reiterating your non-argument doesn't cut it. "Nuff said" is not enough -- that is, if you want an intelligent discussion about your own post. You have to clarify your position. So. Do you or do you not agree that the CPTPP rules on fair competition (as gleaned from the article, of course) are no different from the EU level-playing-field rules?This trading block doesn't have a court, a parliament, a budget, a civil service or a flag. It doesn't demand enormous annual fees to fund its army of of faceless unacoutable over-paid bureaucrats. It doesn't have a huge sense of self-importance, and it doesn't try to take over sovereignty of its member states. How refreshing.
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Apr 1, 2023 6:14:37 GMT
"By the way Bucky, a country can be a member of any number of trade organisations. This is not an either/or issue."
Well you cannot be a member of both the Single Market and the CPTPP - in that case it really is an either/or issue. You certainly can if the EU votes to join this trade alliance. But there is no point since the EU and the UK already have trade agreements with 9 of the 11 members. Tailored to the advantage of each side.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Apr 1, 2023 6:19:37 GMT
The world over, the EU is the odd one out focusing on regulatory harmonisation rather than maximising regulatory competition. By all accounts, the UK is leaving behind the EU and moving forward to a liberalising region of trade in the Pacific. Trade expert Shanker Singham (rightly or wrongly) believes this will finish off any hopes of those hellbent on subjugating the UK back under EU control. For that alone, it's tempting. He states: www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/03/29/cptpp-uk-pacific-trade-deal-brexit-victory-analysis/Remainers hate and mock the idea of a global Britain, so it's worth reminding them from none other than David Frost: www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/03/29/cptpp-uk-pacific-trade-deal-brexit-victory-analysis/Watch out for scare stories about accession to the CPTPP in the coming months. Life wouldn't be the same without our remnants and their customary forecasts of doom and gloom. The devil will be in the detail, but national sovereignty and free trade is much preferable than the EU's model. Hopefully, we can wave goodbye to the EU for good. One of the big problems with the EU was businesses dumping us for cheaper labour and cheaper taxes. In this respect CPTPP could have the same problem. As you say, the devil is in the detail. But definitely worth looking at. If we join CPTPP, it should be by democratic vote. We don't need a democratic vote to have a free-trade agreement Vinny. We're not joining a quasi-free-trade bloc that demands annual fees, free movement of labour, surrendering fishing rights, surrendering sovereignty to a foreign court and compulsory impositions of tariff barriers against other countries. The UK is joining a more advanced and liberalising trade pact than that of the EU. The CPTPP even requires the UK has control over its own regulatory system, so that future governments will be hard pressed now for 'dynamic alignment' with the EU. It sort of mocks one the other predicated chapters in the story called 'Project Fear' that Britain was going to become a wet, windy, grey rock isolated out in the Atlantic with no friends to trade with. Remember that one? The UK is trailblazing and has moved from an inward looking region to a global free-trading outlook. The British Chambers of Commerce believe 90% of global middle-class growth is predicted to happen in the Indo-Pacific region of the world over the next seven years.
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Apr 1, 2023 6:27:21 GMT
Ah, No. Reiterating your non-argument doesn't cut it. "Nuff said" is not enough -- that is, if you want an intelligent discussion about your own post. You have to clarify your position. So. Do you or do you not agree that the CPTPP rules on fair competition (as gleaned from the article, of course) are no different from the EU level-playing-field rules?This trading block doesn't have a court, a parliament, a budget, a civil service or a flag. It doesn't demand enormous annual fees to fund its army of of faceless unacoutable over-paid bureaucrats. It doesn't have a huge sense of self-importance, and it doesn't try to take over sovereignty of its member states. How refreshing.So it has no democratic voice in the administrative control or what rules will be made and has no complaints procedure in the case of trade disagreements. This group is a mere 6 years old. Who knows what rules will be made by the unelected committee whose interests are not in the West. How thoughtless it is to shout about lack of democracy and voice in the EU and then jump in feet first into something you know almost nothing about. This isnt about trade. It cant be. It is another Tory political card trick to grab headlines you have no voice in. How many times does the British population allow itself to be fooled by an unelected Tory government?
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 1, 2023 6:39:41 GMT
This trading block doesn't have a court, a parliament, a budget, a civil service or a flag. It doesn't demand enormous annual fees to fund its army of of faceless unacoutable over-paid bureaucrats. It doesn't have a huge sense of self-importance, and it doesn't try to take over sovereignty of its member states. How refreshing.So it has no democratic voice in the administrative control or what rules will be made and has no complaints procedure in the case of trade disagreements. This group is a mere 6 years old. Who knows what rules will be made by the unelected committee whose interests are not in the West. How thoughtless it is to shout about lack of democracy and voice in the EU and then jump in feet first into something you know almost nothing about. This isnt about trade. It cant be. It is another Tory political card trick to grab headlines you have no voice in. How many times does the British population allow itself to be fooled by an unelected Tory government? More of your usual pro EUSSR bollox.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Apr 1, 2023 8:07:47 GMT
One of the big problems with the EU was businesses dumping us for cheaper labour and cheaper taxes. In this respect CPTPP could have the same problem. As you say, the devil is in the detail. But definitely worth looking at. If we join CPTPP, it should be by democratic vote. We don't need a democratic vote to have a free-trade agreement Vinny. We're not joining a quasi-free-trade bloc that demands annual fees, free movement of labour, surrendering fishing rights, surrendering sovereignty to a foreign court and compulsory impositions of tariff barriers against other countries. The UK is joining a more advanced and liberalising trade pact than that of the EU. The CPTPP even requires the UK has control over its own regulatory system, so that future governments will be hard pressed now for 'dynamic alignment' with the EU. It sort of mocks one the other predicated chapters in the story called 'Project Fear' that Britain was going to become a wet, windy, grey rock isolated out in the Atlantic with no friends to trade with. Remember that one? The UK is trailblazing and has moved from an inward looking region to a global free-trading outlook. The British Chambers of Commerce believe 90% of global middle-class growth is predicted to happen in the Indo-Pacific region of the world over the next seven years. That may be true, but having been in a bad situation for decades without being allowed to vote out harmed our democracy. We need to make a clean break with the past and show that our politicians listen to us now.
|
|