|
|
Post by sheepy on Mar 23, 2023 21:35:04 GMT
All those turned out to be true Einstein. As though I wouldn't know any. Which incidentally is how I know you have Neo Liberal stamped on your head. I meant ones on here. You see I have never argued against the idea that the CIA might have attempted mind control, indeed I think it very likely they would have, hardly a conspiracy at all. Oh you have moved the goalposts in the name of neo Liberalism and all that is sense is now questioned as being something else. Who would have thunk it. When really you should be outraged at such psychological mind warping. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 23, 2023 21:46:06 GMT
A conspiracy theory would be that the vaccine was given despite that it was known to cause heart failure in a significant number of people. Otherwise all you have is that a very small number of exceptions to the rule that the vaccine saved lives. So can you link me a real conspiracy theory?
Heart inflammation link to Pfizer and Moderna jabs Heart inflammation is a "rare" side-effect of the Covid vaccines made by Pfizer and Moderna, according to regulators in Europe.
The European Medicines Agency said the side-effects were more common in younger men.
The medicines safety body said the benefits of Covid vaccines continue to far outweigh any risks.
But doctors and patients have been advised to be aware of the symptoms of heart inflammation.
|
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Mar 23, 2023 21:48:51 GMT
I meant ones on here. You see I have never argued against the idea that the CIA might have attempted mind control, indeed I think it very likely they would have, hardly a conspiracy at all. Oh you have moved the goalposts in the name of neo Liberalism and all that is sense is now questioned as being something else. Who would have thunk it. When really you should be outraged at such psychological mind warping. I explained my position clearly. You can try and claim that minor errors are proof of conspiracy, but they are not. Conspiracy requires deliberate hiding of facts to mislead the public. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Mar 23, 2023 21:53:23 GMT
Oh you have moved the goalposts in the name of neo Liberalism and all that is sense is now questioned as being something else. Who would have thunk it. When really you should be outraged at such psychological mind warping. I explained my position clearly. You can try and claim that minor errors are proof of conspiracy, but they are not. Conspiracy requires deliberate hiding of facts to mislead the public. LOL which none of those were of course. fucking neo liberals as mad as march hares. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Mar 23, 2023 21:56:14 GMT
I explained my position clearly. You can try and claim that minor errors are proof of conspiracy, but they are not. Conspiracy requires deliberate hiding of facts to mislead the public. LOL which none of those were of course. fucking neo liberals as mad as march hares. Spoken like a true conspiracist. Anything that doesn't go to plan is a deliberate act against the people. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Mar 23, 2023 21:58:01 GMT
LOL which none of those were of course. fucking neo liberals as mad as march hares. Spoken like a true conspiracist. Anything that doesn't go to plan is a deliberate act against the people. LOL madder by the minute, first you say what a conspiracy is, then when they are no longer a conspiracy as they are true, you cannot even face that as a truth. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 23, 2023 22:25:14 GMT
The CPS’s annual report from 2008-9 says that “pension arrangements are currently being established” that would “provide pension benefits broadly in line with the Judicial Pension Scheme”. To be fair to Labour, the deal that Starmer got was the same as every previous DPP - the system was scrapped by the Tories after he stepped down. Well as with many things they inherited from earlier governments, New Labour just left it as it is instead of changing it to something fairer. As a line of attack against Starmer though this is desperately weak, since he has stated that it was not his doing and when he changes the law for others he will change it for himself too.
Surely you can come up with better lines of attack against the guy than this? Well the point is that he has had this tax arrangement now for almost 20 years without saying anything about it - now, less than 48 hours after his hypocrisy made the front pages, he suddenly wants to change the deal. It's not exactly an advert for integrity is it? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 26, 2023 13:32:04 GMT
Well as with many things they inherited from earlier governments, New Labour just left it as it is instead of changing it to something fairer. As a line of attack against Starmer though this is desperately weak, since he has stated that it was not his doing and when he changes the law for others he will change it for himself too.
Surely you can come up with better lines of attack against the guy than this? Well the point is that he has had this tax arrangement now for almost 20 years without saying anything about it - now, less than 48 hours after his hypocrisy made the front pages, he suddenly wants to change the deal. It's not exactly an advert for integrity is it? Who set his pension? Was it a norm for that period of time? When was it decided to change the system? |
|
|
|
Post by vlk on Mar 26, 2023 16:25:38 GMT
Labour will win the next election unless they do something ridiculously stupid. Such as bringing back Corbyn and giving him a leading role in the party.
|
|
