|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 23, 2023 13:34:37 GMT
Indeed, 'Jareem Akram', living the high life on benefits. This is why every illegal in the world is desperate to get to a Kent beach and tell the left wing authorities they are refugees, after throwing their passports in the channel. We must be mad. You grab the story as if you knew everything about the situation, when you don't. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 23, 2023 13:35:23 GMT
I'm sure the Mail often does  |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jan 23, 2023 13:36:02 GMT
Some asylum seekers and refugees are highly qualified people, many have degrees, some are doctors, chemists, engineers, pharmacists and teachers. I accept that there are refugees or asylum seekers who are here under false pretences, but not all of them, some are genuinely escaping war, torture, persecution and / or imprisonment or death because of their faith, their beliefs, their background or their politics or for a host of other reasons. Highly qualified people fleeing France by dinghy It's certainly an interesting theory |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 23, 2023 13:37:02 GMT
Oh dear Red….It looks like you are going to get a lecture by the head lefty remaniacs troll. A fucking dead kipper could do more damage LOL.
|
|
|
|
Post by om15 on Jan 23, 2023 13:38:01 GMT
When working they had to put in 100% effort for 100% income, on furlough they put in 0% effort for 80% income, the latter seems to be a good deal to me.
On furlough they didn't have to fund travel costs (fuel, rail fares, bus fares etc), didn't have to pay for coffee or tea breaks, no lunches costs, no expenses for work clothes and so on.
No wonder the lazy bastards want to stay working at home doing nothing, it is a very attractive deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 23, 2023 13:56:40 GMT
No one appeared to be less well off under the furlough scheme, in fact most were better off Please explain how people were "better off" on 80% of their wages? The employer topped it up with the other 20% to make it 100%. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 23, 2023 13:57:30 GMT
Indeed, 'Jareem Akram', living the high life on benefits. This is why every illegal in the world is desperate to get to a Kent beach and tell the left wing authorities they are refugees, after throwing their passports in the channel. We must be mad. You grab the story as if you knew everything about the situation, when you don't. It was her who wanted all the attention, not me. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 23, 2023 14:07:44 GMT
This is a taste of things to come ... It must end.
'Knife-obsessed' Afghan asylum seeker, 21, who said he was 14 to get into the UK before murdering aspiring Royal Marine is a double killer who gunned down two people in Serbia and was convicted of drug dealing in Italy
Lawangeen Abdulrahimzai, 21, fatally stabbed Thomas Roberts to death
Post conviction truth that he had also killed two other people in Serbia came out
The violence erupted outside Subway in Bournemouth on March 12, 2021
The left wing wankers in the Border Force/Home Office who let these criminals in should be charged with gross incompetence. They're a disgrace. And they keep coming ....
Hundreds of migrants braved freezing temperatures to cross the English Channel in dinghies over the weekend on busiest day of illegal crossings so far this year
Hundreds of illegal migrants reportedly made the crossing to the UK on Sunday
It comes amid fears the number of migrants sailing to the UK could it 80,000
|
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jan 23, 2023 14:14:47 GMT
Some refugees, and some asylum seekers are genuine, but not all. We need to filter out the ones who are not genuine, and going by what I have read, that would include anyone from Albania for example. Asylum seekers and refugees outside of detention camps, live on an allowance of £5 per day, and that fiver has to buy food, clothes, toiletries and cleaning materials. Asylum seekers who are housed, are usually housed in areas and places where most British people dont want to live, in some of the worst areas in Britain, in areas which are almost always deprived and not far from been slums. Many asylum seekers (most) want to be able to go out and work, but the rules bar them from doing so ... and we have a labour shortage in this country. Some asylum seekers and refugees are highly qualified people, many have degrees, some are doctors, chemists, engineers, pharmacists and teachers. I accept that there are refugees or asylum seekers who are here under false pretences, but not all of them, some are genuinely escaping war, torture, persecution and / or imprisonment or death because of their faith, their beliefs, their background or their politics or for a host of other reasons. I absolutely 100% disagree. Regardless of whatever status someone claims to be, if they pay a people smuggler to get them from the 'safe' EU state of France to an English beach, they are criminals and should be treated accordingly. Anyone who does not accept this is not only legitimising people trafficking, but encouraging it. Absolutely Fact is and fuck all to do with the EU and entirely due to an arrangement with Britain, France and others before the EEC gang of six had been invented, we had a deal to sort out accommodating refugees from real war and persecution and that still stands. We have a deal with the UNHCR whereby anyone found to be genuinely an asylum seeker or refugee can get here quite legally by asking. These fucking queue jumpers need to have it explained to them hard that their antics have forever screwed any hope they might have had of standing on British soil legally. It’s the only way. |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jan 23, 2023 14:15:36 GMT
Please explain how people were "better off" on 80% of their wages? The employer topped it up with the other 20% to make it 100%. They fucking did not. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 23, 2023 14:20:42 GMT
The employer topped it up with the other 20% to make it 100%. They fucking did not. Are employers obliged to pay furlough?
For most employees on a salary, or with a guaranteed minimum number of hours the employer remains obliged to pay the employee in full if it is not in a position to offer work. To that extent the furlough scheme subsidises the employer's wage cost but does not replace the obligation to pay wages". |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 23, 2023 14:20:56 GMT
Indeed, 'Jareem Akram', living the high life on benefits. This is why every illegal in the world is desperate to get to a Kent beach and tell the left wing authorities they are refugees, after throwing their passports in the channel. We must be mad. Are you claiming to have full knowledge Jareem Akram? If so why not share it. It is mad to keep beating oneself up over a problem when you don't have an answer to it, and more so to beat others up who like yourself don't have an answer to the problem either. Give yourself break, I'm sure you will feel so much better. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 23, 2023 14:29:48 GMT
Indeed, 'Jareem Akram', living the high life on benefits. This is why every illegal in the world is desperate to get to a Kent beach and tell the left wing authorities they are refugees, after throwing their passports in the channel. We must be mad. Are you claiming to have full knowledge Jareem Akram? If so why not share it. It is mad to keep beating oneself up over a problem when you don't have an answer to it, and more so to beat others up who like yourself don't have an answer to the problem either. Give yourself break, I'm sure you will feel so much better. I know what the mother has told the media, can't you read?
How the fuck do I know if she's lying or not, why don't you contact the mother and ask her yourself?
You ask some daft questions, you make out I invented the story, read it, instead of making a cunt out of yourself.
I have no fuckin idea why the idiot would want go public telling the world she gives her toddler a gold £1K dummy, while claiming benefits FFS.
She's a 24 carat plonker, that much I know.
ASK HER.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jan 23, 2023 14:49:12 GMT
Please explain how people were "better off" on 80% of their wages? The employer topped it up with the other 20% to make it 100%. That wasn't compulsory. Most didn't as they didn't have any income. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jan 23, 2023 14:51:51 GMT
When working they had to put in 100% effort for 100% income, on furlough they put in 0% effort for 80% income, the latter seems to be a good deal to me. On furlough they didn't have to fund travel costs (fuel, rail fares, bus fares etc), didn't have to pay for coffee or tea breaks, no lunches costs, no expenses for work clothes and so on. No wonder the lazy bastards want to stay working at home doing nothing, it is a very attractive deal. You are correct about commuting costs, but that is balanced out by increased gas and electric costs. They absolutely do have to fund their own tea, coffee and lunches though! 😂 |
|
