BBC dramas ‘warping modern Britain.'

Judging by the output, that would not surprise me.

Under represented and over representation only matter if you think that exact replication of numbers matters, hence the only way to achieve that would be quotas.

Not only does it not bother me enough that I count them, but tbf it is not unrepresentative of my world. Out of my team of 8, one is in a mixed race marriage and 2 more are products of mixed race marriages.

You have yet to explain why they are a bad thing and why they should not be portrayed as such?

Won’t individuals select who they want to couple/partner with, irrespective of whether they take note of or ignore family, peer or society preferences.

It’s only recently that UK law has allowed same sex liaisons and partnerships even though some religious organisations and societies still do not approve.

Suspecting political interference in the choice advertisers and programme makers have in casting seems paranoid. Both have to please their audiences and buyers to survive, not antagonise them…

That is a bit naiive. They also have to have a major eye on claims of discrimination and the equality laws. It is those laws or rather the threat of those laws that brings about over representation. If you believe that people are not affected one whit by the output of TV companies then you are living in a different world. It is precisely why the soaps get on their soapboxes and 'highlight' issues in their storylines and challenging stereotypes is taken very seriously by many groups. If what you say is true then these things would have no effect, but they do, so it is presenting the problems of the real world in the make believe world and along with the dramas and the adverts what is seen on the screen is basically nudging. As I said since Covid we know very well the government has used the advice of many Psychologists to nudge the population to behave in a certain way through presentation on screen. One aspect is that the white man, although about 40% of the UK adult population is a rarity in the advertising world. 
 
As regards antagonising them no one seems to care about antagonising the white man, he is relegated to an also ran in the grand scheme and can be branded racist, misogynistic or homophobic etc with ease and ignored if he does wonder what is happening to him in what was some time ago his own country. We can hear the cries of how do you like it whitey, and that is not invented.

I doubt that using YouTube to qualify for your consent is a good thing. Let’s just put it all on Dave eh?
I think you are standing Guy Gibsons dog problem on its head . I suspect it was because of the more left leaning worriers who didn’t want to  hear a white man call his dog what most black comedians call other black men ( on the telly ) .
Nothing to do with white people being reminded about last attitudes.
So you don’t mind a lot less black and  Asian people on telly then? A lot more whites is fine by you?

“ WHITE STOCK that put a quarter of the world’s population under the cosh and often relegated other peoples to second class citizens in their own countries”
That’s some shoulder chip. You need therapy for that one .

It’s a variation on the ‘You were there so now we’re here’ argument frequently put forward by former colonial subjects and their descendants as the rationale for their continuing presence amongst us. It’s often coupled in argumentation with the closely-related ‘You exploited us then so now you owe us big-time’ which often accompanies claims-making for more gibs, better compo or reparamarations.