|
Post by borgr0 on Nov 18, 2024 18:12:39 GMT
How many people in the country from abroad are on benefits vs natives? Are they net contributors or net takers? Proof please to support that? any migrant earning less than £35k is a net drain on the economy. Can you show me how the maths on that work? I haven't looked into that for a while.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Nov 18, 2024 19:11:50 GMT
Steamer had over a £100 k in a few short weeks. Lord alli even dressed up steamers wife. How does that compare to others? Its a fucking record thats how it compares. FFS even his specs were supplied by lord alli...
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 18, 2024 22:18:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 18, 2024 23:57:54 GMT
How are we going to be in a fiscal position with a ever increasing eldly population and a decreased birth rate we need immigrants
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 19, 2024 7:44:43 GMT
How are we going to be in a fiscal position with a ever increasing eldly population and a decreased birth rate we need immigrants We need skilled immigrants.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 19, 2024 8:41:28 GMT
How are we going to be in a fiscal position with a ever increasing eldly population and a decreased birth rate we need immigrants We need skilled immigrants. Even the unskilled migrants need doing and the fiscal situation changed after Brexit when a decrease in our European cousins and immigrants from worldwide brought there dependants with them and are more unhealthy then the European. It's a situation you Brexitiers brought on yourselves suck it up
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 19, 2024 8:48:48 GMT
We need skilled immigrants. Even the unskilled migrants need doing and the fiscal situation changed after Brexit when a decrease in our European cousins and immigrants from worldwide brought there dependants with them and are more unhealthy then the European. It's a situation you Brexitiers brought on yourselves suck it up Why would you import unskilled immigrants to make yourself poorer?
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 19, 2024 9:09:11 GMT
Even the unskilled migrants need doing and the fiscal situation changed after Brexit when a decrease in our European cousins and immigrants from worldwide brought there dependants with them and are more unhealthy then the European. It's a situation you Brexitiers brought on yourselves suck it up Why would you import unskilled immigrants to make yourself poorer? Because them jobs need doing has well simple fact Like i said the immigrant fiscal changed from a good one when we had European cousins coming in .to immigration of worldwide coming in and depressing the fiscal situation That after Brexit suck it up its a situation you Brexitiers made
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 19, 2024 11:59:24 GMT
Why would you import unskilled immigrants to make yourself poorer? Because them jobs need doing has well simple fact Like i said the immigrant fiscal changed from a good one when we had European cousins coming in .to immigration of worldwide coming in and depressing the fiscal situation That after Brexit suck it up its a situation you Brexitiers made If you have a Romanian on minimum wage and a Nigerian on minimum wage the cost is the same - it doesn't change because you don't like black people.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 19, 2024 13:54:49 GMT
Because them jobs need doing has well simple fact Like i said the immigrant fiscal changed from a good one when we had European cousins coming in .to immigration of worldwide coming in and depressing the fiscal situation That after Brexit suck it up its a situation you Brexitiers made If you have a Romanian on minimum wage and a Nigerian on minimum wage the cost is the same - it doesn't change because you don't like black people. Lol I've no problem with black people lets try and spell it out for you mr European is likely to be young and healthy come on there own. Nr worldwide immigrants likely be middle aged have certain health conditions like type 2 Diabetes associated with there ethnicity they bring families and more likeky to stay. Can you see why the Brexit invited immigrants are more costly then our European cousins
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 19, 2024 16:38:13 GMT
If you have a Romanian on minimum wage and a Nigerian on minimum wage the cost is the same - it doesn't change because you don't like black people. Lol I've no problem with black people lets try and spell it out for you mr European is likely to be young and healthy come on there own. Nr worldwide immigrants likely be middle aged have certain health conditions like type 2 Diabetes associated with there ethnicity they bring families and more likeky to stay. Can you see why the Brexit invited immigrants are more costly then our European cousins If the European guy is not going to stay then they are even less use.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 19, 2024 16:43:06 GMT
Lol I've no problem with black people lets try and spell it out for you mr European is likely to be young and healthy come on there own. Nr worldwide immigrants likely be middle aged have certain health conditions like type 2 Diabetes associated with there ethnicity they bring families and more likeky to stay. Can you see why the Brexit invited immigrants are more costly then our European cousins If the European guy is not going to stay then they are even less use. Less burdensome on the Economy if they was one. But im happy to see you want low skilled workers and low paid workers to stay . Well come to the dark side
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Nov 20, 2024 4:19:48 GMT
War heroes to be caught by Reeves’s pensions death tax.... Grieving families of military personnel who die while serving could face an inheritance tax bill on vital payouts under Labour. Death in service payments to members of the Armed Forces who die off-duty will be caught by Rachel Reeves’s inheritance tax raid from 2027, The Telegraph understands...... Campaigners are calling on the Government to make death in service payments exempt from the punitive measure which would cut funds to grieving families by up to 40pc. Death in service payments are usually a lump sum paid to named beneficiaries of a worker who dies while on the company payroll. It is typically the equivalent of four-times the late individual’s salary. For members of the Armed Forces, these are paid whether or not the individual was “on duty” at the time of their death. Those who die “on duty” will continue to benefit from a separate tax-free arrangement on their death in service payments. However, a military worker who dies while technically “off duty” but still serving will be stung by the new inheritance tax rules. The changes will apply to service personnel who are unmarried or not in a civil partnership. For example, the children of a widowed soldier who dies off-duty would be charged up to 40pc on their death in service payouts.....
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 20, 2024 4:34:20 GMT
War heroes to be caught by Reeves’s pensions death tax.... Grieving families of military personnel who die while serving could face an inheritance tax bill on vital payouts under Labour. Death in service payments to members of the Armed Forces who die off-duty will be caught by Rachel Reeves’s inheritance tax raid from 2027, The Telegraph understands...... Campaigners are calling on the Government to make death in service payments exempt from the punitive measure which would cut funds to grieving families by up to 40pc. Death in service payments are usually a lump sum paid to named beneficiaries of a worker who dies while on the company payroll. It is typically the equivalent of four-times the late individual’s salary. For members of the Armed Forces, these are paid whether or not the individual was “on duty” at the time of their death. Those who die “on duty” will continue to benefit from a separate tax-free arrangement on their death in service payments. However, a military worker who dies while technically “off duty” but still serving will be stung by the new inheritance tax rules. The changes will apply to service personnel who are unmarried or not in a civil partnership. For example, the children of a widowed soldier who dies off-duty would be charged up to 40pc on their death in service payouts.....
More bollocks form the Telegraph
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Nov 20, 2024 5:52:09 GMT
War heroes to be caught by Reeves’s pensions death tax.... Grieving families of military personnel who die while serving could face an inheritance tax bill on vital payouts under Labour. Death in service payments to members of the Armed Forces who die off-duty will be caught by Rachel Reeves’s inheritance tax raid from 2027, The Telegraph understands...... Campaigners are calling on the Government to make death in service payments exempt from the punitive measure which would cut funds to grieving families by up to 40pc. Death in service payments are usually a lump sum paid to named beneficiaries of a worker who dies while on the company payroll. It is typically the equivalent of four-times the late individual’s salary. For members of the Armed Forces, these are paid whether or not the individual was “on duty” at the time of their death. Those who die “on duty” will continue to benefit from a separate tax-free arrangement on their death in service payments. However, a military worker who dies while technically “off duty” but still serving will be stung by the new inheritance tax rules. The changes will apply to service personnel who are unmarried or not in a civil partnership. For example, the children of a widowed soldier who dies off-duty would be charged up to 40pc on their death in service payouts.....
More bollocks form the Telegraph
|
|