How bad will the Budget be?

Land owners are influencing all politicians to block construction? - seems a bit of a stretch when you consider there are numerous other groups peddling their influence and they do not always align in their desired outcomes.

Land owners are not the ones who have got the politicians to implement layer upon layer of red tape specifically designed to prevent the building of anything.

2, No, we already need those homes for the people living here. We are about a million short. And its not just about enough homes its about making them affordable like they used to be when we bought our first homes. 
That would be the single biggest thing we could do for our economy, free up all the money that currently goes in mortgages for people to spend on life. 

3, That we get some wealthy but unpleasant people moving here, people who expect something back for their investment. Plus if we are to allow anyone in it should only be ones we need for jobs that can't be filled. 

4, ONE LAST TIME. I am not suggesting we build houses so we can move Africa in. I want them for the millions we have already invited to live here and the children of Brits already living here. 

My opinion is that they are doing just as I suggest, that keeping land prices high is the game. Look at the last governments scheme to help first time buyers. 
Did they relax planning law? Compulsory purchase fields? 
No they just guaranteed ever bigger mortgages. 

2 That's all fine, dandy and laudable, but 'releasing the greenbelt' will not reduce immigration - and so, it seems to me you only have half of a coherent policy on the table.

3 Which is one step up from getting large numbers poor but unpleasant people (as we have currently). Do we not have enough poor people in the country already? - we have added about 10 million (official figures). The monies collected by my scheme (perhaps several billion a year) could be used to provide some the services and infrastructure you feel are needed without damaging the economy with taxes - and yet you are against this. 

4 You aren't explicitly advocating it, but the fact that you are suggesting one half of that coherent policy regardless of the other side being implemented, means you are in fact advocating doing one without the other. 

Well they tried relaxing planning Laws and ran into the same roadblock as every other government that has tried - the people do not want it and vote accordingly.

We cannot build housing, railways, power stations, infrastructure or even a reservoir as subsequent governments over the years have enacted one set of red tape after another which gives numerous opportunities for those opposed to block development. Most of that red tape now being environmental based - we must protect some obscure Moth or Beetle. 

A recent example being the nutrient neutrality rules that were blocking the building of a 100,000 homes. The last Government tried to scrap them but this was thwarted by a campaign in the Lords led by Labour.

We don't have a housing problem, we have an over population problem and we can't build our way out of it.