|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Dec 12, 2022 17:32:18 GMT
No wrongful accusation when someone justifies the action of terrorists. Only that there was no justification for any action, only somebody pointing out possible grievances as to why a coup was on the cards, which anyone can have without resorting to or supporting any action. The indivudual even challenged your wrongful accusation. It wasn't wrongful. I only apologised after he was forced to say he didn't support a violent coup attempt. Previous to that he justified the actions of the plotters because he agreed with the far right group's dislike of Muslim immigrants. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 12, 2022 17:34:36 GMT
No wrongful accusation when someone justifies the action of terrorists. Only that there was no justification for any action, only somebody pointing out possible grievances as to why a coup was on the cards, which anyone can have without resorting to or supporting any action. The indivudual even challenged your wrongful accusation. Has the penny dropped yet, B4? Take a look at Squeaky's big picture of Farage. He posted that immediately after saying he only does it to wind people up. You would be hard put to find a franker and more honest confession of trolling. Don't fall over yourself in your rush to criticise him, now. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2022 17:55:54 GMT
Only that there was no justification for any action, only somebody pointing out possible grievances as to why a coup was on the cards, which anyone can have without resorting to or supporting any action. The indivudual even challenged your wrongful accusation. It wasn't wrongful. I only apologised after he was forced to say he didn't support a violent coup attempt. Previous to that he justified the actions of the plotters because he agreed with the far right group's dislike of Muslim immigrants. He gave no actual indication that he did, and I say it was wrongful with 100% certainty. If you were confused then you could have asked him. Instead you just accused him with ad-hominem attacks, which led to my intervention. I saw somebody posting a little objectivity on a site to encourage discussion, and there is nothing wrong with that outside of this forum.
As for your latest accusation I will leave that to Sandypine to challenge.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Dec 12, 2022 19:01:17 GMT
Indeedy. This did have the makings of an interesting thread until Monte and Whoiney waded in with the ad-homs.
That's Whoiney's MO of course, so nothing new there, I am however a little surprised at Monte letting Whoiney play him like a fiddle.
But hey-ho, at least it gives us humorists the opportunity for some good-natured trollery.
Shame that's all it's good for.
|
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Dec 12, 2022 19:37:49 GMT
Indeedy. This did have the makings of an interesting thread until Monte and Whoiney waded in with the ad-homs. That's Whoiney's MO of course, so nothing new there, I am however a little surprised at Monte letting Whoiney play him like a fiddle. But hey-ho, at least it gives us humorists the opportunity for some good-natured trollery. Shame that's all it's good for. You could always go back to your tacit support of the coup planners. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Dec 12, 2022 19:39:58 GMT
Indeedy. This did have the makings of an interesting thread until Monte and Whoiney waded in with the ad-homs. That's Whoiney's MO of course, so nothing new there, I am however a little surprised at Monte letting Whoiney play him like a fiddle. But hey-ho, at least it gives us humorists the opportunity for some good-natured trollery. Shame that's all it's good for. You could always go back to your tacit support of the coup planners. Like your tacit support of paedos? After all, I haven't heard you condemning them. |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Dec 12, 2022 19:46:05 GMT
You could always go back to your tacit support of the coup planners. Like your tacit support of paedos? After all, I haven't heard you condemning them. You've never heard me suggest they occupied quite reasonable positions or wonder if their aims have more widespread support. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Dec 12, 2022 19:53:30 GMT
Like your tacit support of paedos? After all, I haven't heard you condemning them. You've never heard me suggest they occupied quite reasonable positions or wonder if their aims have more widespread support. So questioning is wrong now is it? LOL! 
Let's be honest, Monte - you've embarassed yourself on this thread and Whoiney's played you like a fiddle.
You know it. We know it. So stop trying to save face because you're just compounding your error.
Hopefully you've learned from this.
I'm done with this thread. If you've any sense, so should you be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 12, 2022 20:51:12 GMT
You've never heard me suggest they occupied quite reasonable positions or wonder if their aims have more widespread support. So questioning is wrong now is it? LOL!
Let's be honest, Monte - you've embarassed yourself on this thread and Whoiney's played you like a fiddle.
You know it. We know it. So stop trying to save face because you're just compounding your error.
Hopefully you've learned from this.
I'm done with this thread. If you've any sense, so should you be.
Poor Squeaky has it bad. Nothing can be done for him now, except to make him comfortable. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Dec 12, 2022 21:52:41 GMT
You've never heard me suggest they occupied quite reasonable positions or wonder if their aims have more widespread support. So questioning is wrong now is it? LOL!
Let's be honest, Monte - you've embarassed yourself on this thread and Whoiney's played you like a fiddle.
You know it. We know it. So stop trying to save face because you're just compounding your error.
Hopefully you've learned from this.
I'm done with this thread. If you've any sense, so should you be.
Everything that needed to be said has. The alleged plotters are now facing trial. We'll see what the court finds. Thread can be closed. |
|
