|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 5, 2024 6:40:25 GMT
That's strange, HappyJack has been using personal attacks as an argument toward the OP for eight pages and accusing other members of being full of shit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 5, 2024 6:59:17 GMT
Alternatively, you could try to expand upon or explain your point and maybe influence opinions. I am sure that I am not the only one who has struggled to follow your sparsely worded contributions. However, what I do know, whether you choose to do so or not, is that anyone whose first thought, when hearing about this poor woman’s terrible ordeal, is to think “ illegal immigrant” is worthy of nothing but our deepest contempt So you think that the mass importation of people who don't share our values, and consider women to be beneath them, has no bearing on crimes of this nature?
So no, your point is null.
According to these people everyone should remain blind to the reality of the situation when it suits them, and should be vigorously told off whilst pretending nothing bad is happening. It was the same arguments used to smear and attack people for challenging the racially motivated grooming gangs, where mentioning it was treated as the worst offence in the world. It's truely sickening how they rely on so much hypocrisy whist insisting that everyone else conform to their sociopathic disorders.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 5, 2024 7:08:55 GMT
According to the Media there is CCTV Footage of the Rape on the Park Bench, the accused told Police she offered him oral sex for £10 and she was alive when he left her, according to the Crown she was totally unconscious through drink and drugs, cause of her death was an Heart Attack caused by his Penis putting pressure on a nerve in her throat. It said in the report that she was 3 times over the legal drink drive limit. He took full advantage of that poor woman and should hang in my opinion... |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 5, 2024 7:09:46 GMT
Then, if you are telling the truth, you have plenty to choose from. Just pick out the worst 10 examples and let’s see if you are full of your usual shit or not. Your posts.........you read them What a surprise! When invited to back up your completely false claim, and true to your usual MO, you run away. I don’t need to read them because I wrote them and I know that there is not a single word in there to support your scurrilous claim that I am responsible for “7 pages of utter contempt from you for the victim whilst supporting the arsehole who raped her. Shame on you. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 5, 2024 7:14:43 GMT
Your posts.........you read them What a surprise! When invited to back up your completely false claim, and true to your usual MO, you run away. I don’t need to read them because I wrote them and I know that there is not a single word in there to support your scurrilous claim that I am responsible for “7 pages of utter contempt from you for the victim whilst supporting the arsehole who raped her. Shame on you. You would know all about provaction. It's the main weapons in the lefts arsenal... |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 5, 2024 7:19:21 GMT
Your posts.........you read them What a surprise! When invited to back up your completely false claim, and true to your usual MO, you run away. I don’t need to read them because I wrote them and I know that there is not a single word in there to support your scurrilous claim that I am responsible for “7 pages of utter contempt from you for the victim whilst supporting the arsehole who raped her. Shame on you. You're the one trying to mask the reality of the situation for political gain. Others are just relying on the information that has been presented.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Oct 5, 2024 7:19:22 GMT
Your posts.........you read them What a surprise! When invited to back up your completely false claim, and true to your usual MO, you run away. I don’t need to read them because I wrote them and I know that there is not a single word in there to support your scurrilous claim that I am responsible for “7 pages of utter contempt from you for the victim whilst supporting the arsehole who raped her. Shame on you. The original story is based on creating a reaction whether that is a righteous one is open to contention. I don't see any moral high ground that has been reached or likely to be. |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 5, 2024 7:23:23 GMT
What a surprise! When invited to back up your completely false claim, and true to your usual MO, you run away. I don’t need to read them because I wrote them and I know that there is not a single word in there to support your scurrilous claim that I am responsible for “7 pages of utter contempt from you for the victim whilst supporting the arsehole who raped her. Shame on you. The original story is based on creating a reaction whether that is a righteous one is open to contention. I don't see any moral high ground that has been reached or likely to be. This sounds like a conspiracy theory and an attempt to advocate media censorship. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 5, 2024 7:25:17 GMT
Note how the usual press sidesteps carefully around the assalients christion name which is "Mohamed" they just refer to him as "Lidow" if he were a white male we would be told how much his house is worth, his shoe size and how many sugars he takes in his morning cuppa....
|
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 5, 2024 7:40:36 GMT
Note how the usual press sidesteps carefully around the assalients christion name which is "Mohamed" they just refer to him as "Lidow" if he were a white male we would be told how much his house is worth, his shoe size and how many sugars he takes in his morning cuppa.... How do you know that he has a Christian name? Are you assuming that he is a Christian? And how do you know that he is not a white male? Are you just assuming that to be the case because we have not been “told how much his house is worth, his shoe size and how many sugars he takes in his morning cuppa....”? |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 5, 2024 7:44:13 GMT
You can spot them by their ignorance. Christian name is commonly known as their first name in this country. It doesn't necessarily have any relevance to Christianity. Old habits...
|
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 5, 2024 7:45:47 GMT
What a surprise! When invited to back up your completely false claim, and true to your usual MO, you run away. I don’t need to read them because I wrote them and I know that there is not a single word in there to support your scurrilous claim that I am responsible for “7 pages of utter contempt from you for the victim whilst supporting the arsehole who raped her. Shame on you. You would know all about provaction. It's the main weapons in the lefts arsenal... I think that counts as a personal attack, one of the many you have launched against me on this thread and on others, and one of the many ignored by like-minded types who disproportionately occupy this forum. |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 5, 2024 7:50:58 GMT
You would know all about provaction. It's the main weapons in the lefts arsenal... I think that counts as a personal attack, one of the many you have launched against me on this thread, and one of the many ignored by like-minded types who disproportionately occupy this forum. You have done nothing but post personal attacks where the first was toward the OP for addressing the name of the scumbag in question and theorising on his status in the UK. You haven't offered anything else to counter it, and rely solely on attempts to manipulate people into conforming with your dogmatic views. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 5, 2024 7:52:21 GMT
You can spot them by their ignorance. Christian name is commonly known as their first name in this country. It doesn't necessarily have any relevance to Christianity. Old habits... Surely the ignorance lies with those who fail to recognise that the majority in this country are not Christians and that the majority therefore do not have Christian names? |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Oct 5, 2024 7:53:00 GMT
The original story is based on creating a reaction whether that is a righteous one is open to contention. I don't see any moral high ground that has been reached or likely to be. This sounds like a conspiracy theory and an attempt to advocate media censorship. You have only been drawn here to repeat your usual nonsense by the headline, it is half a story with enough holes to make you think whatever your mindset allows, so obviously for purely political reaction, which in fairness works every time. |
|
