|
Post by Bentley on Oct 2, 2024 11:50:39 GMT
That’s the problem with interviewers on TV and media now . They don’t want to find the truth , they want to nail the politician in front of them. They want to make a career for themselves and bashing politicians is mightily popular. It is on here just as it is everywhere else. It is virtually impossible to find anyone agreeing with you if you actually support a politician and have something positive to say. They will immediately look up the shitmongers express to find the dirtiest piece of dirt on said person, and even it it is a bold-faced lie, which it nearly always is.
Physicalists call it entrainment. Over time the proles gradually become entrained with the signal broadcast from the BBC and their agents. Hate Weeks are the new craze.
Yes I have noticed some people like to bash the politicians in the West and only post or accept praise for China and Russia
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 2, 2024 11:51:17 GMT
It's strange how GMB aren't making a meal of the cuts to pensioners winter fuel allowance, if this had been a Tory policy Reid/Balls would be ripping them to pieces .... Oh hang about Ed Balls is married to lefty Yvette Cooper Secretary of State for the Home Department, I was wondering how lefty MPs on GMB are getting a easy ride ..... LOL I never watch GMB so cannot comment on it. Kuhnsberg and Bruce are definite Tories though. But every TV person will have an opinion. What matters is whether or not they do their job impartially regardless of their own opinions. Kuhnsberg and Bruce have at times failed dismally in this Because you say so, of course.🤣
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Oct 2, 2024 11:53:11 GMT
Accusing Laura Kunessberg of been "Left biased" or "Right biased", is only conjecture, its a baseless opinion formed only by the bias of those that have accused her of been both Left and Right.
Its got to the point where no BBC presenter, journalist or reporter can open their mouths without it been interpreted by someone to mean they are politically biased.
The point is that virtually everyone as an individual has political opinions, some we know about, and others we know nothing about.
The former BBC presenter and journalist Andrew Neal was known to be "of the Right", and of course he still is, he presented the Politics Show for years, but I never detected any bias in his many interviews or presentations.
I trust the BBC, I trust ITN and SKY News, and yet SKY News is often mocked by people on the Left due to its Murdoch links.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2024 11:57:57 GMT
Kuenssberg like Fiona Bruce can't help themselves, and anyone who says the BBC is not bias needs their heads testing.
Kemi Badenoch in tense clash with BBC's Laura Kuenssberg over Muslim immigration Kemi Badenoch is one of four contenders aiming to replace Rishi Sunak as Tory Party leader in November.
Yet again another BBC enabler can't wait to brand Kemi racist, they just come unstuck when she happens to be Black, she has every right as a Tory leader candidate to speak her mind without being branded a Muslim hater.
As a Labour supporter and voter, I can categorically tell you without hesitation that during the Corbyn years the BBC was much lambasted and criticised by the far Left. But more importantly was the NUMBER 1 target for those of the far Left, the Corbynites, the Momentum types and hard line Socialists, their most hated figure within the BBC was / and still is Laura Kunessberg. Laura Kunessberg has been called a "Tory" and "Right Wing" more than any other BBC journalist, and that is an indisputable fact. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My own view ... I have never, ever seen any evidence that either Laura Kunessberg or our BBC is biased, and whats more, I know that it is actually impossible, because the BBC is NOT operated as one organisation, it is a an assortment of different semi-independent departments headed by different people, and headed by a former member of the Conservative Party who is a personal friend of Boris Johnson. The only openly biased TV news channel in the UK is GB News So part of your argument for bias being impossible at the BBC, is that it is headed by a Conservative appointed by Boris Johnson? lol Sorry but that is a far less than convincing argument for the impossibility of bias, and makes more sense as as circumstantial evidence in support of the notion of a pro-Tory bias. And you are mistaking the moderate left for far left as so many love to do.
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Oct 2, 2024 11:59:09 GMT
Starmer may or may not have done, he is essentially a decent and honourable man,You should be on the stage , this is the funniest post I've read for weeks - Starmer ...essentially a decent and honourable man,
- these are the last words anyone should use to describe Starmer That's a cracker......
The steaming pile Starmer ‘should pay £48,000 tax’ on freebies, accountants claim......
2TK should pay tax on the £107,000 of freebies he received as Labour leader, accountants have said.
The Prime Minister is under fire for accepting more gifts than any other MP since 2019 – including football tickets, clothes and accommodation.
However, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) “appears to exempt” politicians from paying tax on gifts from donors and political allies despite requiring taxpayers in other sectors to do so, according to accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg.
I read yesterday that apparently 'public office holders'' such as MPs and ministers are exempt from paying tax on ''benefits in kind'' Remember Rachel Freeze claimed £4000 in heating bills for her residence Another ''perk'' that should be abolished
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Oct 2, 2024 12:11:10 GMT
They want to make a career for themselves and bashing politicians is mightily popular. It is on here just as it is everywhere else. It is virtually impossible to find anyone agreeing with you if you actually support a politician and have something positive to say. They will immediately look up the shitmongers express to find the dirtiest piece of dirt on said person, and even it it is a bold-faced lie, which it nearly always is.
Physicalists call it entrainment. Over time the proles gradually become entrained with the signal broadcast from the BBC and their agents. Hate Weeks are the new craze.
Yes I have noticed some people like to bash the politicians in the West and only post or accept praise for China and Russia Anyone who is interested in politics is going to have his or her set of political views. Taken as a whole, the world had a huge number of leaders of one sort or another. The law of averages means everyone will find one or two at least who have very similar political views. It is the same for me, but my political views and ideas clash with the mainstream Brits. I had a lot of ideas on what should be done in this country. One that goes right back to the age of ten was my interest in technology and the fact this country was dropping out of the technology race. It was a minor held view and has always been, but it's just one strand of belief that I find maps on well to what is going on in both those countries. I've had minor views re our military as well. They don't map on well to Russia, but they do with China. Anyway, you can go through this process of looking at existing beliefs and how they map to different leaders. I'm simply being honest when I find one who thinks like I do. I would be dishonest with myself if I just joined in with the Hate Weeks just to "fit in". That would be a rather commie stance surely. Commie comes from com which is Latin for together.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 2, 2024 12:21:16 GMT
Almost every UK journalist/interviewer OPENLY slags off Trump, even though Biden didn't know what day it was those same journalists never dare slag off Biden with the same malicious, vindictive, offensive, libellous, hostile, bias way they do Trump, the BBC encourage Trump bashing, yet again they can not remain impartial, and they have to butt their unwanted noses in to US politics.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 2, 2024 14:32:23 GMT
Yes I have noticed some people like to bash the politicians in the West and only post or accept praise for China and Russia Anyone who is interested in politics is going to have his or her set of political views. Taken as a whole, the world had a huge number of leaders of one sort or another. The law of averages means everyone will find one or two at least who have very similar political views. It is the same for me, but my political views and ideas clash with the mainstream Brits. I had a lot of ideas on what should be done in this country. One that goes right back to the age of ten was my interest in technology and the fact this country was dropping out of the technology race. It was a minor held view and has always been, but it's just one strand of belief that I find maps on well to what is going on in both those countries. I've had minor views re our military as well. They don't map on well to Russia, but they do with China. Anyway, you can go through this process of looking at existing beliefs and how they map to different leaders. I'm simply being honest when I find one who thinks like I do. I would be dishonest with myself if I just joined in with the Hate Weeks just to "fit in". That would be a rather commie stance surely. Commie comes from com which is Latin for together. People are simply being honest when they criticise or express suspicion regarding China .
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Oct 2, 2024 22:39:10 GMT
Anyone who is interested in politics is going to have his or her set of political views. Taken as a whole, the world had a huge number of leaders of one sort or another. The law of averages means everyone will find one or two at least who have very similar political views. It is the same for me, but my political views and ideas clash with the mainstream Brits. I had a lot of ideas on what should be done in this country. One that goes right back to the age of ten was my interest in technology and the fact this country was dropping out of the technology race. It was a minor held view and has always been, but it's just one strand of belief that I find maps on well to what is going on in both those countries. I've had minor views re our military as well. They don't map on well to Russia, but they do with China. Anyway, you can go through this process of looking at existing beliefs and how they map to different leaders. I'm simply being honest when I find one who thinks like I do. I would be dishonest with myself if I just joined in with the Hate Weeks just to "fit in". That would be a rather commie stance surely. Commie comes from com which is Latin for together. People are simply being honest when they criticise or express suspicion regarding China . Fair enough, but I get these detailed reports and discussions from their professors who explain their system in detail and I keep coming across examples where I've always thought the UK does things wrongly and it would be much better to do it a different way. The different way is never ever mentioned by anyone, but nevertheless it leaves me wondering the reason why they don't, and then I see China do things the way I would have done it. I admit I'm a bit odd and often think differently from the crowd, but it is rather lonely being the odd one out in these examples. It's quite reassuring when I find out my way is actually practised by 1.4bn people! Until the web came along few in the UK had any idea what was going on in that country. They have so many different ways of doing stuff that you often finds some of their tricks are useful for our own purposes. The way they do business is especially interesting. Anyway, none of it relates to any scary Daily Mail China reports. That does not interest me. My interests are more to do with industry and how they manage to manufacture so cheaply. The Chinese culture is also fun to learn about. I love their proverbs.
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Oct 4, 2024 7:18:16 GMT
The thing that struck me about Keunssberg's interview WITH Badenoch was that she seemed to be uneasy with Badenoch's statement that some cultures are less valid than others. So she immediately wanted to know what the less valid cultures were. And when Badenoch talked about cultures that regarded women as inferior or allowed sex between adults and children Kuenssberg immediately said that Badenoch was talking about muslims - game set and match. Badenoch is too wily to get caught like that, but it's a pity that Badenoch didn't agree because it is a valid point for an argument. The basic point is that islam is an ancient and unreformed culture and is completely incompatible with modern cultures. Let's hear Keunssberg try to argue against that.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Oct 4, 2024 7:32:25 GMT
Some cultures are inferior to others.
Wife beating cultures.
Religious bully cultures.
FGM and arranged marriage cultures.
All inferior to the civilised western way.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 4, 2024 8:34:39 GMT
As a Labour supporter and voter, I can categorically tell you without hesitation that during the Corbyn years the BBC was much lambasted and criticised by the far Left. But more importantly was the NUMBER 1 target for those of the far Left, the Corbynites, the Momentum types and hard line Socialists, their most hated figure within the BBC was / and still is Laura Kunessberg. Laura Kunessberg has been called a "Tory" and "Right Wing" more than any other BBC journalist, and that is an indisputable fact... By far left loons, as you've already stated. My own view ... I have never, ever seen any evidence that either Laura Kunessberg or our BBC is biased, and whats more, I know that it is actually impossible That's because you share its bias and are therefore blind to it.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 4, 2024 10:30:32 GMT
People are simply being honest when they criticise or express suspicion regarding China . Fair enough, but I get these detailed reports and discussions from their professors who explain their system in detail and I keep coming across examples where I've always thought the UK does things wrongly and it would be much better to do it a different way. The different way is never ever mentioned by anyone, but nevertheless it leaves me wondering the reason why they don't, and then I see China do things the way I would have done it. I admit I'm a bit odd and often think differently from the crowd, but it is rather lonely being the odd one out in these examples. It's quite reassuring when I find out my way is actually practised by 1.4bn people! Until the web came along few in the UK had any idea what was going on in that country. They have so many different ways of doing stuff that you often finds some of their tricks are useful for our own purposes. The way they do business is especially interesting. Anyway, none of it relates to any scary Daily Mail China reports. That does not interest me. My interests are more to do with industry and how they manage to manufacture so cheaply. The Chinese culture is also fun to learn about. I love their proverbs. Indeed your love for China is the same as See2s love for Tony Blair . Blinkered and total.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 4, 2024 20:12:02 GMT
Almost every UK journalist/interviewer OPENLY slags off Trump, even though Biden didn't know what day it was those same journalists never dare slag off Biden with the same malicious, vindictive, offensive, libellous, hostile, bias way they do Trump, the BBC encourage Trump bashing, yet again they can not remain impartial, and they have to butt their unwanted noses in to US politics. Trump is an extremist lying egotistical threat to American democracy. Biden isn't.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2024 20:22:08 GMT
The thing that struck me about Keunssberg's interview WITH Badenoch was that she seemed to be uneasy with Badenoch's statement that some cultures are less valid than others. So she immediately wanted to know what the less valid cultures were. And when Badenoch talked about cultures that regarded women as inferior or allowed sex between adults and children Kuenssberg immediately said that Badenoch was talking about muslims - game set and match. Badenoch is too wily to get caught like that, but it's a pity that Badenoch didn't agree because it is a valid point for an argument. The basic point is that islam is an ancient and unreformed culture and is completely incompatible with modern cultures. Let's hear Keunssberg try to argue against that. Christianity used to be much the same, but we have been moving away from that ever since the enlightenment. Some substantial segments of the populations of some Muslim countries still have a medieval mindset when it comes to their attitude to their faith
|
|