|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 30, 2024 17:06:35 GMT
And can you see why Johnson lacked the basic qualities necessary to hold public office, never mind that of Prime Minister? Boris and co was the problem Starmer promised to solve . Hence the excuse that Starmer is no worse than Johnson isn’t going to wash. Neither Starmer, nor any other UK PM in history, has been anywhere close to being as bad as Johnson. Sure, each and every one of them will have had their fallibilities, but Johnson is a disgrace of a human being who was wholly unfit for public office. And Starmer did solve the Johnson problem, or at least proved instrumental in solving it. His clinical questioning and trapping of Johnson in parliament laid Johnson bare, making his suspension from parliament and his dishonourable demise all but certain. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 30, 2024 18:08:23 GMT
Boris and co was the problem Starmer promised to solve . Hence the excuse that Starmer is no worse than Johnson isn’t going to wash. Neither Starmer, nor any other UK PM in history, has been anywhere close to being as bad as Johnson. Sure, each and every one of them will have had their fallibilities, but Johnson is a disgrace of a human being who was wholly unfit for public office. And Starmer did solve the Johnson problem, or at least proved instrumental in solving it. His clinical questioning and trapping of Johnson in parliament laid Johnson bare, making his suspension from parliament and his dishonourable demise all but certain. Starter has made a good start to being as bad as Johnson but Johnson had more time . I’m confident that Starmer is suite capable of achieving it . He didn’t solve the problem, he became another problem . |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Oct 1, 2024 15:56:24 GMT
It won’t, or at least it shouldn’t, because whatever Starmer may or may not have done, he is essentially a decent and honourable man, certainly when juxtaposed alongside Johnson, who lacked the basic qualities to render him fit for any public position, never mind that of Prime Minister, as no PM before or after him has ever done. You should be on the stage , this is the funniest post I've read for weeks 
- Starmer ...essentially a decent and honourable man,
- these are the last words anyone should use to describe Starmer |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Oct 1, 2024 16:16:15 GMT
Neither Starmer, nor any other UK PM in history, has been anywhere close to being as bad as Johnson. Sure, each and every one of them will have had their fallibilities, but Johnson is a disgrace of a human being who was wholly unfit for public office. And Starmer did solve the Johnson problem, or at least proved instrumental in solving it. His clinical questioning and trapping of Johnson in parliament laid Johnson bare, making his suspension from parliament and his dishonourable demise all but certain. Starter has made a good start to being as bad as Johnson but Johnson had more time . I’m confident that Starmer is suite capable of achieving it . He didn’t solve the problem, he became another problem . He's far worse , and enhancing his known reputation as a liar on a daily basis I don't recall BoJo being given £30k of free clothes and £2k worth of free glasses by a generous donor (and free gear for his wife) Carrie used to rent her clothes |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2024 18:42:16 GMT
Kuenssberg like Fiona Bruce can't help themselves, and anyone who says the BBC is not bias needs their heads testing.
Kemi Badenoch in tense clash with BBC's Laura Kuenssberg over Muslim immigration
Kemi Badenoch is one of four contenders aiming to replace Rishi Sunak as Tory Party leader in November.
Yet again another BBC enabler can't wait to brand Kemi racist, they just come unstuck when she happens to be Black, she has every right as a Tory leader candidate to speak her mind without being branded a Muslim hater.
Unless she is a Muslim hater |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2024 18:45:21 GMT
That’s the problem with interviewers on TV and media now . They don’t want to find the truth , they want to nail the politician in front of them. Agree, but the BBC don't want to nail the lefty politicians, they get a easy ride. That's simply not true. in left wing circles she is known as Tory Kuhnsberg |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 1, 2024 18:49:12 GMT
That isn’t the criteria for being a Tory . Lefties think anyone who is right of them are far right .
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 1, 2024 19:02:45 GMT
Agree, but the BBC don't want to nail the lefty politicians, they get a easy ride. That's simply not true. in left wing circles she is known as Tory Kuhnsberg Strangely enough there is a pattern emerging, the likes of Kuhnsberg, Vorderman and many tax paying Celebs are now realising they 'Backed the wrong horse' ... LOL |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 2, 2024 4:40:02 GMT
That's simply not true. in left wing circles she is known as Tory Kuhnsberg Strangely enough there is a pattern emerging, the likes of Kuhnsberg, Vorderman and many tax paying Celebs are now realising they 'Backed the wrong horse' ... LOL Unsurprising considering that they all live in the same echo chamber.
Pretty much like all lefties.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 2, 2024 5:40:23 GMT
It won’t, or at least it shouldn’t, because whatever Starmer may or may not have done, he is essentially a decent and honourable man, certainly when juxtaposed alongside Johnson, who lacked the basic qualities to render him fit for any public position, never mind that of Prime Minister, as no PM before or after him has ever done. You should be on the stage , this is the funniest post I've read for weeks
- Starmer ...essentially a decent and honourable man,
- these are the last words anyone should use to describe Starmer That's a cracker......
The steaming pile Starmer ‘should pay £48,000 tax’ on freebies, accountants claim......
2TK should pay tax on the £107,000 of freebies he received as Labour leader, accountants have said.
The Prime Minister is under fire for accepting more gifts than any other MP since 2019 – including football tickets, clothes and accommodation.
However, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) “appears to exempt” politicians from paying tax on gifts from donors and political allies despite requiring taxpayers in other sectors to do so, according to accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2024 7:28:43 GMT
That's simply not true. in left wing circles she is known as Tory Kuhnsberg Strangely enough there is a pattern emerging, the likes of Kuhnsberg, Vorderman and many tax paying Celebs are now realising they 'Backed the wrong horse' ... LOL Vorderman's sympathies have always been in a mildly leftish direction but Kuhnsberg is definitely a Tory supporter |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 2, 2024 7:33:50 GMT
Vorderman's sympathies have always been in a mildly leftish direction She was using her celebrity status to campaign for Labour and only turned against them after she realised what a spoilt dumb brat she was. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2024 8:03:47 GMT
That's simply not true. in left wing circles she is known as Tory Kuhnsberg Strangely enough there is a pattern emerging, the likes of Kuhnsberg, Vorderman and many tax paying Celebs are now realising they 'Backed the wrong horse' ... LOL Kuhnsberg never backed the Labour horse in the first place. She was notorious for giving Labour guests a much tougher time than Tory ones. Not that I am unduly concerned because I backed neither but I'd prefer it if her likes did their jobs so well that there was no evidence of overt bias. She has often failed to do her job that well. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2024 8:41:56 GMT
What is there in your link that proves she is a Tory? I have seen countless examples from her over the years of obvious Tory and anti-left bias. But I agree that the link supplied offers no examples or evidence of this, just a series of assertions - without examples or evidence - and refutations, none of which proves anything. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Oct 2, 2024 8:48:43 GMT
She's NEUTRAL.
Far lefties don't seem to like neutrality.
Someone who is neutral sticks it to both sides.
Remoaners took a broadside because they were about as democratic as Pol Pot.
And they didn't like the criticism.
|
|
