|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 30, 2024 8:24:57 GMT
Again? Not from me although I have seen others describe you and/or Fairsociety in similar unflattering terms . You should think hard about why reasonable, thoughtful and fairly well-informed contributors arrive at such damning conclusions about you rather than just dismiss their valid and warranted comments in the manner that you do above. While you are at it, you might also want to reflect upon just how hypocritical people who either attribute negative personal traits or characteristics upon persons who hold different opinions from, or have different values to, them (or who indicate approval when others do this) are when they respond in the manner that you do above. Or you could try just not giving a shit.
Works for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 30, 2024 8:25:40 GMT
You mean you think the bbc didn’t apologise? but they did linkAnd from that link Well, there we go, there is proof, thanks. Not my, not your, job to provide proof for Pacifico claims though, is it. All The Best So you were wrong then.
Well done Nulla, it's only taken how many pages for you to admit it?  |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 30, 2024 9:20:28 GMT
I have no idea why you thought that and I suspect that you don’t either. You said yourself you were running away... There you go just making things up again.You just can’t help yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 30, 2024 9:27:29 GMT
You said yourself you were running away... There you go just making things up again.You just can’t help yourself. go troll someone else you are just boring and looking for a scrap.. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Sept 30, 2024 9:32:38 GMT
Well, there we go, there is proof, thanks. Not my, not your, job to provide proof for Pacifico claims though, is it. All The Best So you were wrong then.
Well done Nulla, it's only taken how many pages for you to admit it? Well, I was right insofar as Pacifico could not provide evidence. I have no problem with changing my standpoints when new evidence comes to light. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 30, 2024 9:35:43 GMT
There you go just making things up again.You just can’t help yourself. go troll someone else you are just boring and looking for a scrap.. LOL. For you, of all people, to say that to anyone else on here takes the biscuit. You truly have zero self-awareness. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 30, 2024 9:37:25 GMT
go troll someone else you are just boring and looking for a scrap.. LOL. For you, of all people, to say that to anyone else on here takes the biscuit. You truly have zero self-awareness. Yàaaaawwwwnnnn |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 30, 2024 9:45:11 GMT
go troll someone else you are just boring and looking for a scrap.. LOL. For you, of all people, to say that to anyone else on here takes the biscuit. You truly have zero self-awareness. Well at least we don't hide behind a nom de plume, why don't you use your original forum screen name. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 30, 2024 9:49:27 GMT
I have no problem with changing my standpoints when new evidence comes to light.That’s because you are an adult who behaves like an adult, unlike those on here who refuse to even look at evidence because that might prove them wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 30, 2024 9:54:27 GMT
LOL. For you, of all people, to say that to anyone else on here takes the biscuit. You truly have zero self-awareness. Well at least we don't hide behind a nom de plume, why don't you use your original forum screen name. Said the man or woman hiding behind a nom de plume . . . FFS! |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 30, 2024 9:56:53 GMT
Well at least we don't hide behind a nom de plume, why don't you use your original forum screen name. Said the man or woman hiding behind a nom de plume . . . FFS! can't you read?
a nom de plume meaning your old screen name.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 30, 2024 9:57:26 GMT
LOL. For you, of all people, to say that to anyone else on here takes the biscuit. You truly have zero self-awareness. Well at least we don't hide behind a nom de plume, why don't you use your original forum screen name.Said the man or woman hiding behind a nom de plume . . . FFS! can't you read?
a nom de plume meaning your old screen name.
|
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 30, 2024 10:04:04 GMT
Yes, I can read and I read and understood what you said first time around hence ny response which was, and remains,
“ Said the man or woman hiding behind a nom de plume . . . FFS! “ |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 30, 2024 10:07:44 GMT
Yes, I can read and I read and understood what you said first time around hence ny response which was, and remains,
“ Said the man or woman hiding behind a nom de plume . . . FFS! “Well at least you didn't deny you didn't have a other screen name ..... LOL |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 30, 2024 10:18:08 GMT
Said the man or woman hiding behind a screen name … FFS! 🤣🤣
“ Well at least you didn't deny you didn't have a other [sic] screen name “
You started out by suggesting that I had another nom de plume (or screen name) on the old site but now you are saying that I am not denying not having one. Make your mind up FFS!
|
|
