|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Sept 29, 2024 17:49:00 GMT
So you've admitted they didn't do what you claim they did. Interesting. All The Best They apologised for having a biased audience on QT - which is exactly what I claimed. You need to have a lie down in a dark room. No. You've CLAIMED they apologised for having a biased audience on QT. You've provided no evidence that they actually did so. Even if you do provide such evidence (and I am betting you won't/can't) it does not follow that all QT audiences are biased. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 29, 2024 17:49:58 GMT
So you've admitted they didn't do what you claim they did. Interesting. All The Best They apologised for having a biased audience on QT - which is exactly what I claimed. You need to have a lie down in a dark room. Yes his lid shouldn't open until sunset 18.42, the daylight doesn't agree with him. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Sept 29, 2024 17:54:28 GMT
They apologised for having a biased audience on QT - which is exactly what I claimed. You need to have a lie down in a dark room. No. You've CLAIMED they apologised for having a biased audience on QT. You've provided no evidence that they actually did so. Even if you do provide such evidence (and I am betting you won't/can't) it does not follow that all QT audiences are biased. All The Best Go and have that lie down - you are becoming incoherent. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Sept 29, 2024 18:16:47 GMT
No. You've CLAIMED they apologised for having a biased audience on QT. You've provided no evidence that they actually did so. Even if you do provide such evidence (and I am betting you won't/can't) it does not follow that all QT audiences are biased. All The Best Go and have that lie down - you are becoming incoherent. I am not the one making claims then not backing them up - that is YOU. I have backed up my claim by quoting your posts. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Sept 29, 2024 21:41:06 GMT
Look - I claimed that the BBC QT audience was biased..
...the BBC apologised for the QT audience being biased..
...you then claim there is no evidence of bias..
..as I said - a lie down is advised.
|
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 29, 2024 21:43:44 GMT
Wow! I have no idea what has happened since I was on here earlier today to elicit such an attitudinal development but that is great news. That being the case, I look forward to your imminent post acknowledging that you misrepresented what happened and what was said on QT on Thursday night, that you created a narrative and dialogue at odds with the actuality, and that you stubbornly refused to view what actually occurred on iplayer because you knew that this would show that what you have been claiming and arguing is not credible |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 29, 2024 22:00:22 GMT
Wow! I have no idea what has happened since I was on here earlier today to elicit such an attitudinal development but that is great news. That being the case, I look forward to your imminent post acknowledging that you misrepresented what happened and what was said on QT on Thursday night, that you created a narrative and dialogue at odds with the actuality, and that you stubbornly refused to view what actually occurred on iplayer because you knew that this would show that what you have been claiming and arguing is not credible I thougt you were in hiding for a few days... |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 29, 2024 22:03:11 GMT
I have no idea why you thought that and I suspect that you don’t either.
|
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 29, 2024 22:09:34 GMT
I don’t think that you know much about anything that you post on here tbh but that you lack the self-awareness to realise that. I have had enough of dealing with biased plodders and truth deniers like you and Fairsociety for now so I will leave you both to wallow with one another in your mutual ignorance for the rest of the day. Have fun! Ah bless fuck off and return a few days later thinking all has been forgotten...Toodle pip old bean you go and lick your self inflicted wounds.. I would be surprised if your memory bank could remember anything for a few days given how quickly you forget so many things that are posted on here - and my only self-inflicted wounds are the result of assuming that you and Fairsociety were credible members of this forum with worthwhile contributions to offer up rather than waste of space numbskulls. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 29, 2024 22:14:21 GMT
I have no idea why you thought that and I suspect that you don’t either. You said yourself you were running away... |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 29, 2024 22:15:53 GMT
Ah bless fuck off and return a few days later thinking all has been forgotten...Toodle pip old bean you go and lick your self inflicted wounds.. I would be surprised if your memory bank could remember anything for a few days given how quickly you forget so many things that are posted on here - and my only self-inflicted wounds are the result of assuming that you and Fairsociety were credible members of this forum with worthwhile contributions to offer up rather than waste of space numbskulls. There's the ad homs card yet again.... |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 30, 2024 1:12:43 GMT
Again? Not from me although I have seen others describe you and/or Fairsociety in similar unflattering terms . You should think hard about why reasonable, thoughtful and fairly well-informed contributors arrive at such damning conclusions about you rather than just dismiss their valid and warranted comments in the manner that you do above.
While you are at it, you might also want to reflect upon just how hypocritical people who either attribute negative personal traits or characteristics upon persons who hold different opinions from, or have different values to, them (or who indicate approval when others do this) are when they respond in the manner that you do above.
|
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Sept 30, 2024 3:27:26 GMT
Its easy to substantiate - simply watch the QT program they aired after 9/11. Anyone who thinks that audience was representative of anything except the selection precesses of the BBC is a liar. It was so bad even the BBC apologised... So no proof then, just opinion. So still totally unsubstantiated. Just as I thought (well, knew actually). All The Best You mean you think the bbc didn’t apologise? but they did linkAnd from that link |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 30, 2024 3:46:45 GMT
Again? Not from me although I have seen others describe you and/or Fairsociety in similar unflattering terms . You should think hard about why reasonable, thoughtful and fairly well-informed contributors arrive at such damning conclusions about you rather than just dismiss their valid and warranted comments in the manner that you do above. While you are at it, you might also want to reflect upon just how hypocritical people who either attribute negative personal traits or characteristics upon persons who hold different opinions from, or have different values to, them (or who indicate approval when others do this) are when they respond in the manner that you do above. Yaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnn... |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Sept 30, 2024 7:59:44 GMT
So no proof then, just opinion. So still totally unsubstantiated. Just as I thought (well, knew actually). All The Best You mean you think the bbc didn’t apologise? but they did linkAnd from that link Well, there we go, there is proof, thanks. Not my, not your, job to provide proof for Pacifico claims though, is it. All The Best |
|
