|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 29, 2024 14:39:38 GMT
Take it from me I'm not alone in thinking you're dim-witted, you're just too dim-witted to notice. Oh, well, must be right then eh? After all you are the one that used "you can't tell the difference between X" type arguments that are totally grammatically incorrect and make no sense; that must make you clever, right? Whereas I would use "you can't tell the difference between X and Y". Which is of course the ONLY grammatically correct way to put it; and that means I am dim-witted, right? LOL All The Best I have to be honest, I'm not even going to read that ^^ waffle, I got up to 'Oh, well, must be right then eh' ... and that was it.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Sept 29, 2024 15:03:46 GMT
Oh, well, must be right then eh? After all you are the one that used "you can't tell the difference between X" type arguments that are totally grammatically incorrect and make no sense; that must make you clever, right? Whereas I would use "you can't tell the difference between X and Y". Which is of course the ONLY grammatically correct way to put it; and that means I am dim-witted, right? LOL All The Best I have to be honest, I'm not even going to read that ^^ waffle, I got up to 'Oh, well, must be right then eh' ... and that was it. Probably best, you clearly lack the intellectual capacity to understand even basic English. Nice to see you, tacitly at least, owning your obvious deficiencies. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 29, 2024 15:08:51 GMT
I have to be honest, I'm not even going to read that ^^ waffle, I got up to 'Oh, well, must be right then eh' ... and that was it. Probably best, you clearly lack the intellectual capacity to understand even basic English. Nice to see you, tacitly at least, owning your obvious deficiencies.All The Best That sentence makes no sense, well not to educated people anyway .... is there a code to decipher it?
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Sept 29, 2024 15:12:53 GMT
Probably best, you clearly lack the intellectual capacity to understand even basic English. Nice to see you, tacitly at least, owning your obvious deficiencies.All The Best That sentence makes no sense, well not to educated people anyway .... is there a code to decipher it? Of course it does. That you think it doesn't rather proves my point. Well done, that's one thing you've got right today. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 29, 2024 15:13:27 GMT
Just tired, not even the rosetta stone can make head nor tail of it.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 29, 2024 15:16:13 GMT
That sentence makes no sense, well not to educated people anyway .... is there a code to decipher it? Of course it does. That you think it doesn't rather proves my point. Well done, that's one thing you've got right today. All The Best Think I've found it, you speak with forked tongue ... explains everything.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 29, 2024 15:19:19 GMT
I would have changed ‘ tacitly at least ‘ with ‘ albeit unknowingly’ but I don’t pretend to be clever.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 29, 2024 15:22:05 GMT
I would have changed ‘ tacitly at least ‘ with ‘ albeit unknowingly’ but I don’t pretend to be clever. Well at least he was pleased to see me ... LOL
"nice to see you"
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 29, 2024 15:23:51 GMT
I have to be honest, I'm not even going to read that ^^ waffle, I got up to 'Oh, well, must be right then eh' ... and that was it. Probably best, you clearly lack the intellectual capacity to understand even basic English. Nice to see you, tacitly at least, owning your obvious deficiencies. All The Best I would have changed ‘ tacitly at least ‘ with ‘ albeit unknowingly’ but I don’t pretend to be clever. Well at least he was pleased to see me ... LOL
"nice to see you"
It doesn't require a comma.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 29, 2024 15:29:09 GMT
Probably best, you clearly lack the intellectual capacity to understand even basic English. Nice to see you, tacitly at least, owning your obvious deficiencies. All The Best Well at least he was pleased to see me ... LOL
"nice to see you"
It doesn't require a comma. Nice to see you, to see you …………..nice 👍
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 29, 2024 15:30:46 GMT
It doesn't require a comma. Nice to see you, to see you …………..nice 👍 LOL.....good game good game
oops I mean .. good game, good game!
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Sept 29, 2024 15:55:49 GMT
I would have changed ‘ tacitly at least ‘ with ‘ albeit unknowingly’ but I don’t pretend to be clever. Well, if I have to dumb it down to help him understand that also proves my point. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 29, 2024 15:58:19 GMT
Nice to see you, to see you …………..nice 👍 LOL.....good game good game
oops I mean .. good game, good game!
"Nice to see you",
LOL... did you go to the school of hard knocks?
BTW It's not nice to see you
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 29, 2024 16:00:02 GMT
I would have changed ‘ tacitly at least ‘ with ‘ albeit unknowingly’ but I don’t pretend to be clever. Well, if I have to dumb it down to help him understand that also proves my point. All The Best Nope. You didn’t use the right phrase . Tacit suggests an implied agreement or point made .
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Sept 29, 2024 17:44:10 GMT
Yes - because the BBC are in the habit of apologising for things they didn't do.. So you've admitted they didn't do what you claim they did. Interesting. All The Best They apologised for having a biased audience on QT - which is exactly what I claimed. You need to have a lie down in a dark room.
|
|