|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Aug 22, 2024 15:43:53 GMT
Did he say his family was more important than anyone else's? He doesn't need to say it. He's a muslim, so it's a given. |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 22, 2024 15:45:00 GMT
I don't know how Khan has the gall to make a statement fearing for the safety of 'his family' WTF what about the safety of every man woman and child in London, why is his family any more important than any other family? He turns London lawless, people are afraid to walk the streets during the day never mind the night, then he has the nerve to tell us how frightened he is for the safety of HIS FAMILY FUCK OFF KHAN that's all I can say .... I hope the families living in and around London protest for the safety of their families. Maybe he knows if he cannot deliver the Islamists will replace him? I can't think of what other dangers he could be in. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 22, 2024 15:45:28 GMT
If Khan is now whinging and whining about the safety of 'his family', he should have never put them in harms way by endorsing a racist balloon of the President of the United States ...... what the fuck was numbnuts thinking of?
|
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Aug 22, 2024 15:49:22 GMT
Sometimes your reasoning is incomprehensible The National Air Traffic Service ( NATS ) gave permission for the inflatable, they had no reservations or worries on grounds of safety. OFFENSIVE - As stated previously is not a consideration, and neither should it be There were no Health & Safety concerns There were no grounds for not allowing the inflatable ... why can't you get it ? Don't talk crap, it was health and safety on the ground
1. Distraction for motorists
2. Danger if it exploded and fell to the ground, no guarantee where it would have landed
That's just two reasons for starters.
So lets get this straight - The 3 statuotory bodies or organisations which were required to give authorisation on the inflatable all decided that there were no grounds to not allow it to take to the air, but you know better. ? The National Air Traffic Service gave the green light, as did The Metropolitan Police, these surely must be the two most important agencies in terms of Health & Safety, including public safety, air safety etc. There is actually no evidence that Sadiq Khan was even involved in the decision as its a matter for a committee within the GLA. What about Hot Air Baloons ?, which are often given the green light to fly over London You are obviously annoyed because it poked fun at Donald Trump, one of your right wing populist heroes, a man who is very divisive, a man whom an awfull lot of British people dont like. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 22, 2024 15:54:29 GMT
Don't talk crap, it was health and safety on the ground
1. Distraction for motorists
2. Danger if it exploded and fell to the ground, no guarantee where it would have landed
That's just two reasons for starters.
So lets get this straight - The 3 statuotory bodies or organisations which were required to give authorisation on the inflatable all decided that there were no grounds to not allow it to take to the air, but you know better. ? The National Air Traffic Service gave the green light, as did The Metropolitan Police, these surely must be the two most important agencies in terms of Health & Safety, including public safety, air safety etc. There is actually no evidence that Sadiq Khan was even involved in the decision as its a matter for a committee within the GLA. What about Hot Air Baloons ?, which are often given the green light to fly over London You are obviously annoyed because it poked fun at Donald Trump, one of your right wing populist heroes, a man who is very divisive, a man whom an awfull lot of British people dont like. WTF has Air Traffic got to do with it, everyone would have cheered if a Boeing 747 had of rammed in to it, and if a Boeing 747 was flying that low I would have thought most of London would have been running for cover FFS. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 16:03:10 GMT
Don't talk crap, it was health and safety on the ground
1. Distraction for motorists
2. Danger if it exploded and fell to the ground, no guarantee where it would have landed
That's just two reasons for starters.
So lets get this straight - The 3 statuotory bodies or organisations which were required to give authorisation on the inflatable all decided that there were no grounds to not allow it to take to the air, but you know better. ? The National Air Traffic Service gave the green light, as did The Metropolitan Police, these surely must be the two most important agencies in terms of Health & Safety, including public safety, air safety etc. There is actually no evidence that Sadiq Khan was even involved in the decision as its a matter for a committee within the GLA. What about Hot Air Baloons ?, which are often given the green light to fly over London You are obviously annoyed because it poked fun at Donald Trump, one of your right wing populist heroes, a man who is very divisive, a man whom an awfull lot of British people dont like. You are obviously annoyed that we have pointed out Khan endorsed and was complicit in insulting a visiting POTUS . Whether he triggers lefties or not is irrelevant. Well it should have been . He could have stopped it but didn’t. He clearly approved of insulting the president of one of our closest allies. Compare that with the visit from Xi the previous year . |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 16:13:20 GMT
It's a joke. And you aren't a third party. Don’t try to wriggle out of it . You made a false claim and now you are trying to wriggle out of posting to the standards you require of others . The friends that you fabricated would be the third or fourth party . Depends on how many you made up. A) It was a joke, I freely admit I can't prove the existence of these friends of yours B) I've not demanded irrefutable proof from anyone on this thread C) I said you can demand irrefutable proof I never said I would provide it. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 22, 2024 16:15:29 GMT
Don’t try to wriggle out of it . You made a false claim and now you are trying to wriggle out of posting to the standards you require of others . The friends that you fabricated would be the third or fourth party . Depends on how many you made up. A) It was a joke, I freely admit I can't prove the existence of these friends of yours B) I've not demanded irrefutable proof from anyone on this thread C) I said you can demand irrefutable proof I never said I would provide it. So you openly admit goading another poster, I think there's a thread about this on the
'Forum suggestions and feedback'
|
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 16:16:18 GMT
Did he say his family was more important than anyone else's? He doesn't need to say it. He's a muslim, so it's a given. How so? |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 16:18:29 GMT
A) It was a joke, I freely admit I can't prove the existence of these friends of yours B) I've not demanded irrefutable proof from anyone on this thread C) I said you can demand irrefutable proof I never said I would provide it. So you openly admit goading another poster, I think there's a thread about this on another forum.
'Forum suggestions and feedback'
It's called a joke. Sorry, didn't realise one had to have a sense of humour bypass before posting on these boards. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 22, 2024 16:20:52 GMT
So you openly admit goading another poster, I think there's a thread about this on another forum.
'Forum suggestions and feedback'
It's called a joke. Sorry, didn't realise one had to have a sense of humour bypass before posting on these boards. It's not a joke, you have basically spent at least 10 posts directed at the integrity of another poster, who we now know was correct, and when you are called out for your lies and to discredit this poster you now call it a .... Joke ... don't think so. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 16:23:04 GMT
It's called a joke. Sorry, didn't realise one had to have a sense of humour bypass before posting on these boards. It's not a joke, you have basically spent at least 10 posts directed at the integrity of another poster, who we now know was correct, and when you are called out for your lies and to discredit this poster you now call it a .... Joke ... don't think so. Nope. Bentley said I demanded irrefutable proof, which I didn't. When I asked him to back up his accusation he failed to do so, it was only then that I made a joke at his expense. What lies have I told? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 16:26:20 GMT
Don’t try to wriggle out of it . You made a false claim and now you are trying to wriggle out of posting to the standards you require of others . The friends that you fabricated would be the third or fourth party . Depends on how many you made up. A) It was a joke, I freely admit I can't prove the existence of these friends of yours B) I've not demanded irrefutable proof from anyone on this thread C) I said you can demand irrefutable proof I never said I would provide it. A) They were not friends of mine . You made them up. B) Lies you “ Ok, so does the fact that Khan permitted the Khan balloon constitute irrefutable proof that he endorsed it?“. You demanded irrefutable proof but hid it behind a question mark. C) Yes your hypocrisy is obvious . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 16:28:22 GMT
It's not a joke, you have basically spent at least 10 posts directed at the integrity of another poster, who we now know was correct, and when you are called out for your lies and to discredit this poster you now call it a .... Joke ... don't think so. Nope. Bentley said I demanded irrefutable proof, which I didn't. When I asked him to back up his accusation he failed to do so, it was only then that I made a joke at his expense. What lies have I told? Lie You”Ok, so does the fact that Khan permitted the Khan balloon constitute irrefutable proof that he endorsed it? You demanded irrefutable proof but hid behind a question mark. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 16:28:51 GMT
A) It was a joke, I freely admit I can't prove the existence of these friends of yours B) I've not demanded irrefutable proof from anyone on this thread C) I said you can demand irrefutable proof I never said I would provide it. A) They were not friends of mine . You made them up. B) Lies you “ Ok, so does the fact that Khan permitted the Khan balloon constitute irrefutable proof that he endorsed it?“. You demanded irrefutable proof but hid it behind a question mark. C) Yes your hypocrisy is obvious . A) It's called a joke B) It was a question not a demand C) No hypocrisy as I never demanded anything Anyway, I think I've entertained this ad-hom thread diversion long enough. |
|
