|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 14:43:15 GMT
No, permitting something and endorsing something are two different things. Yes,he endorsed it . Where is the evidence that he endorsed it?
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 14:45:00 GMT
No, permitting something and endorsing something are two different things. What! How is allowing or permitting an act to happen, any different from endorsing or agreeing with it? Permitting someone to do something isn't the same as endorsing it, the mods on this forum permit us to post all sorts of comments it doesn't mean that they endorse every one. Khan permitted anti-ulez protests, does that mean he endorsed them?
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 14:47:29 GMT
No, permitting something and endorsing something are two different things. I seem to remember the BBC got a lot of criticism from the left for allowing Nick Griffin a platform and complained quite bitterly that permitting him to take part was tantamount to endorsing his views. So it seems it is very subjective and the left, as ever, let their hypocrisy shine through By the logic of some posters on this thread, the BBC must endorse the views of every politician and political party they permit to appear on Question Time.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 14:47:32 GMT
Where is the evidence that he endorsed it? I’ve posted it in previous posts .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 14:49:23 GMT
What! How is allowing or permitting an act to happen, any different from endorsing or agreeing with it? Permitting someone to do something isn't the same as endorsing it, the mods on this forum permit us to post all sorts of comments it doesn't mean that they endorse every one. Khan permitted anti-ulez protests, does that mean he endorsed them? This has all been pointed out in previous post . You and the other two stooges simply go back to the original mantra and you demand ‘ irrefutable’ proof .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 14:51:10 GMT
I seem to remember the BBC got a lot of criticism from the left for allowing Nick Griffin a platform and complained quite bitterly that permitting him to take part was tantamount to endorsing his views. So it seems it is very subjective and the left, as ever, let their hypocrisy shine through By the logic of some posters on this thread, the BBC must endorse the views of every politician and political party they permit to appear on Question Time. Where did they say that ?
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 14:52:54 GMT
Where is the evidence that he endorsed it? I’ve posted it in previous posts . Where exactly?
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 14:53:17 GMT
Permitting someone to do something isn't the same as endorsing it, the mods on this forum permit us to post all sorts of comments it doesn't mean that they endorse every one. Khan permitted anti-ulez protests, does that mean he endorsed them? This has all been pointed out in previous post . You and the other two stooges simply go back to the original mantra and you demand ‘ irrefutable’ proof . I've not demanded anything.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 14:54:01 GMT
This has all been pointed out in previous post . You and the other two stooges simply go back to the original mantra and you demand ‘ irrefutable’ proof . I've not demanded anything. Yes you are .
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 14:54:53 GMT
By the logic of some posters on this thread, the BBC must endorse the views of every politician and political party they permit to appear on Question Time. Where did they say that ? I didn't say they said it, I said by the logic of.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 14:54:54 GMT
I’ve posted it in previous posts . Where exactly? In previous posts on this thread .
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 14:55:04 GMT
I've not demanded anything. Yes you are . Where?
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 14:55:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 14:55:49 GMT
In previous posts on this thread . Can you quote it please.
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 14:56:02 GMT
|
|