|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 14:57:07 GMT
Where did they say that ? I didn't say they said it, I said by the logic of. Sandy “I seem to remember the BBC got a lot of criticism from the left for allowing Nick Griffin a platform and complained quite bitterly that permitting him to take part was tantamount to endorsing his views. So it seems it is very subjective and the left, as ever, let their hypocrisy shine through” So how does that post equate to “the BBC must endorse the views of every politician and political party they permit to appear on Question Time.”? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 14:57:49 GMT
In previous posts on this thread . Can you quote it please. No.Im not repeating a series of posts that you have already read . |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 14:58:19 GMT
I didn't say they said it, I said by the logic of. Sandy “I seem to remember the BBC got a lot of criticism from the left for allowing Nick Griffin a platform and complained quite bitterly that permitting him to take part was tantamount to endorsing his views. So it seems it is very subjective and the left, as ever, let their hypocrisy shine through” So how does that post equate to “the BBC must endorse the views of every politician and political party they permit to appear on Question Time.”? I said by the logic of some posters not Sandy's comment. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 14:59:09 GMT
No.Im not repeating a series of posts that you have already read . Yeah sure. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 15:00:39 GMT
Sandy “I seem to remember the BBC got a lot of criticism from the left for allowing Nick Griffin a platform and complained quite bitterly that permitting him to take part was tantamount to endorsing his views. So it seems it is very subjective and the left, as ever, let their hypocrisy shine through” So how does that post equate to “the BBC must endorse the views of every politician and political party they permit to appear on Question Time.”? I said by the logic of some posters not Sandy's comment. You replied to Sandy’s post . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 15:01:43 GMT
No.Im not repeating a series of posts that you have already read . Yeah sure. I’m glad we finally agree that I did . |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 15:08:12 GMT
I said by the logic of some posters not Sandy's comment. You replied to Sandy’s post . In which I said "by the logic of some posters" not Sandy. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 15:09:10 GMT
I’m glad we finally agree that I did . Yes and that you've got lots of cool friends they just go to a different school and you don't have to tell us their names for it to be true. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 15:11:00 GMT
You replied to Sandy’s post . In which I said "by the logic of some posters" not Sandy. You replied to a post that has nothing to do with the reply you posted ? Are you sure ? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 15:11:53 GMT
I’m glad we finally agree that I did . Yes and that you've got lots of cool friends they just go to a different school and you don't have to tell us their names for it to be true. Please provide irrefutable proof of that claim. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Aug 22, 2024 15:15:08 GMT
Permitting someone to do something isn't the same as endorsing it, the mods on this forum permit us to post all sorts of comments it doesn't mean that they endorse every one. Khan permitted anti-ulez protests, does that mean he endorsed them? You are being extremely disingenuous. Khan did not 'permit' the protests. The law of the land permitted them. Khan could not have stopped anti-ulez protests, although I think we all know he would have liked to. Peaceful protest is protected under the law. (At the moment) Quote: "Every individual, regardless of cause, has the right to protest, march or demonstrate in a public space". |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 15:17:26 GMT
Permitting someone to do something isn't the same as endorsing it, the mods on this forum permit us to post all sorts of comments it doesn't mean that they endorse every one. Khan permitted anti-ulez protests, does that mean he endorsed them? You are being extremely disingenuous. Khan did not 'permit' the protests. The law of the land permitted them. Khan could not have stopped anti-ulez protests, although I think we all know he would have liked to. Peaceful protest is protected under the law. (At the moment) Quote: "Every individual, regardless of cause, has the right to protest, march or demonstrate in a public space". Surely the balloon was also peaceful protest? |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 15:18:08 GMT
In which I said "by the logic of some posters" not Sandy. You replied to a post that has nothing to do with the reply you posted ? Are you sure ? It related to the content of Sandy's post. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 15:19:27 GMT
Yes and that you've got lots of cool friends they just go to a different school and you don't have to tell us their names for it to be true. Please provide irrefutable proof of that claim. I would have thought it was fairly obvious it was a joke. Clearly I overestimated you. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 15:20:53 GMT
You replied to a post that has nothing to do with the reply you posted ? Are you sure ? It related to the content of Sandy's post. Do what part of Sandys post suggest by its logic that “the BBC must endorse the views of every politician and political party they permit to appear on Question Time.”? |
|
