|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 15:21:37 GMT
It related to the content of Sandy's post. Do what part of Sandys post suggest by its logic that “the BBC must endorse the views of every politician and political party they permit to appear on Question Time.”? Sandy mentioned QT in his post. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 22, 2024 15:22:31 GMT
You are being extremely disingenuous. Khan did not 'permit' the protests. The law of the land permitted them. Khan could not have stopped anti-ulez protests, although I think we all know he would have liked to. Peaceful protest is protected under the law. (At the moment) Quote: "Every individual, regardless of cause, has the right to protest, march or demonstrate in a public space". Surely the balloon was also peaceful protest? The balloon was offensive, just like anyone holding up banners with racist or terrorist intentions are breaking the law, most decent people of the UK felt embarrassed and ashamed of the Trump balloon, and I just hope he doesn't think we are all low life disrespectful scum like Khan and his cronies. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Aug 22, 2024 15:23:10 GMT
Surely the balloon was also peaceful protest? The balloon protest?.. Ahh the baby Trump blimp. Other than to be childishly disrespectful to the president of the US, what exactly was the message of the protest? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 15:23:51 GMT
Please provide irrefutable proof of that claim. I would have thought it was fairly obvious it was a joke. Clearly I overestimated you. Prove it . You made a statement and cannot support it with irrefutable proof . Now you claiming it was obvious. Im merely using your own standards of debate. Maybe you over estimated yourself . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 15:24:55 GMT
Do what part of Sandys post suggest by its logic that “the BBC must endorse the views of every politician and political party they permit to appear on Question Time.”? Sandy mentioned QT in his post. So Sandy mentioning QT suggest by its own logic that “the BBC must endorse the views of every politician and political party they permit to appear on Question Time.”? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 22, 2024 15:25:00 GMT
You are being extremely disingenuous. Khan did not 'permit' the protests. The law of the land permitted them. Khan could not have stopped anti-ulez protests, although I think we all know he would have liked to. Peaceful protest is protected under the law. (At the moment) Quote: "Every individual, regardless of cause, has the right to protest, march or demonstrate in a public space". Surely the balloon was also peaceful protest? Now we are getting to the bottom of it, so now you admit the balloon was a 'protest', and that's why Khan endorsed it.... got there in the end. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 15:25:03 GMT
Surely the balloon was also peaceful protest? The balloon was offensive, just like anyone holding up banners with racist or terrorist intentions are breaking the law, most decent people of the UK felt embarrassed and ashamed of the Trump balloon, and I just hope he doesn't think we are all low life disrespectful scum like Khan and his cronies. Freedom of speech/expression includes the right to cause offence. If I told you I find your post offensive would you delete it? Were you equally offended by the Khan balloon? |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 15:25:34 GMT
I would have thought it was fairly obvious it was a joke. Clearly I overestimated you. Prove it . You made a statement and cannot support it with irrefutable proof . Now you claiming it was obvious. Im merely using your own standards of debate. Maybe you over estimated yourself . What standards are they? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 15:28:04 GMT
Prove it . You made a statement and cannot support it with irrefutable proof . Now you claiming it was obvious. Im merely using your own standards of debate. Maybe you over estimated yourself . What standards are they? Irrefutable proof if you make a statement about a third party . You” Yes and that you've got lots of cool friends they just go to a different school and you don't have to tell us their names for it to be true. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 15:34:53 GMT
Irrefutable proof if you make a statement about a third party . You” Yes and that you've got lots of cool friends they just go to a different school and you don't have to tell us their names for it to be true. It's a joke. And you aren't a third party. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 22, 2024 15:34:59 GMT
I don't know how Khan has the gall to make a statement fearing for the safety of 'his family'
WTF what about the safety of every man woman and child in London, why is his family any more important than any other family?
He turns London lawless, people are afraid to walk the streets during the day never mind the night, then he has the nerve to tell us how frightened he is for the safety of HIS FAMILY
FUCK OFF KHAN that's all I can say .... I hope the families living in and around London protest for the safety of their families.
|
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 22, 2024 15:38:42 GMT
I don't know how Khan has the gall to make a statement fearing for the safety of 'his family' WTF what about the safety of every man woman and child in London, why is his family any more important than any other family? He turns London lawless, people are afraid to walk the streets during the day never mind the night, then he has the nerve to tell us how frightened he is for the safety of HIS FAMILY FUCK OFF KHAN that's all I can say .... I hope the families living in and around London protest for the safety of their families. Did he say his family was more important than anyone else's? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 15:40:22 GMT
Irrefutable proof if you make a statement about a third party . You” Yes and that you've got lots of cool friends they just go to a different school and you don't have to tell us their names for it to be true. It's a joke. And you aren't a third party. Don’t try to wriggle out of it . You made a false claim and now you are trying to wriggle out of posting to the standards you require of others . The friends that you fabricated would be the third or fourth party . Depends on how many you made up. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 22, 2024 15:41:58 GMT
I don't know how Khan has the gall to make a statement fearing for the safety of 'his family' WTF what about the safety of every man woman and child in London, why is his family any more important than any other family? He turns London lawless, people are afraid to walk the streets during the day never mind the night, then he has the nerve to tell us how frightened he is for the safety of HIS FAMILY FUCK OFF KHAN that's all I can say .... I hope the families living in and around London protest for the safety of their families. Did he say his family was more important than anyone else's? The fact he never mentioned anyone else's family, then yes he's only thinking of the safety of his own family. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 22, 2024 15:43:47 GMT
It's no different than if I went out and started a riot, then stated I was afraid for the safety of my family, most people would rightly say ..... WELL YOU FUCKING STARTED IT NUMBNUTS.
|
|
