Some people are trying to destroy Britain

Well if you're going to get pedantic have the last Commons report on the topic (ie before the Queen died)


commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8885/

' The Crown encompasses both the monarch and the government. It is vested in the Queen, but in general its functions are exercised by Ministers of the Crown accountable to the UK Parliament or the three devolved legislatures.'

So back to the point at hand, the Civil Service has to obey the law and when the government of the day wants to do different to the law it's duty is to say no.  

That is a different point and falls under advice and is incumbent on any employee anywhere that if they are being asked to break the law they can say no. A civil servant can say what he likes but if he refuses a legal instruction from a Minister of the Crown he is at odds with his job description. Breaking the law is not the same as trying to change existing law.

Of all the things that I posted as examples of people trying to destroy our country I would have thought that the least contentious was the Civil Service. The politicisation of the Civil Service has been obvious for years - since Blair in fact. And it was also obvious long before Blair when a lot of episodes of "Yes Minister" revolved around Sir Humphrey's clever manoeuvring to prevent Hacker doing anything.

Yet predictably you pick this to attack. No one's fucking interested. You just derail any thread by posting ill-thought out nonsense.

I have an intolerance to BS especially when it's used to malign people I know to be good

Maybe you could give an example or two please of where you suppose the Civil Service have acted wrongly to oppose government.

The point about unwinding QE (i.e. Quantitative Tightening) is that it doesn't need to be done now - when interest rates are high and we're in a debt spiral. The BoE is normally friendly to the govt - independent, but friendly. The debt costs the BoE nothing. It's an unusual thing to do.

And the latest example of Civil Service intransigence towards govt policy was their refusal to go along with the Rwanda policy. If they want to influence govt policy they should stand for parliament. Until they get elected it's nothing to do with them. And don't say that the Rwanda policy was hobbled by the ECHR - we can ignore them if we want. The point is the politicisation of the CS. 

Rubbish. 

"Home Office staff have threatened to strike and drawn comparisons to working for the Third Reich over Priti Patel’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, it has emerged".

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/apr/20/home-office-staff-threaten-mutiny-over-shameful-rwanda-asylum-deal#:~:text=Home%20Office%20staff%20threaten%20mutiny%20over%20'shameful'%20Rwanda%20asylum%20deal,-On%20an%20intranet&text=Home%20Office%20staff%20have%20threatened,to%20Rwanda%2C%20it%20has%20emerged.

They need to fire most of these loony leftie WFH Civil Servants, they have too much say, they are employed to serve the government and the people, their job description does not include interfering with government policy, the government run the country not a bunch of loony leftie woke snowflake civil servants employed and paid for by the tax payers, they are employed to implement the law not make the laws.